View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
in_seoul_2003
Joined: 24 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:02 am Post subject: Are Koreans in the UN qualified? |
|
|
Fantastic! Congratulations to Ms. Lee. So is she actually going to do something with this position or did she get it just because she's Korean and so is Ban?
First step: do something about Korean sailors buying sex in Kiribati:
--2003 - Kiriibati bans Korean ships because they are consistently trying to buy sex, some women as young as 14.
--they go at it again
--2005 Kiribati bans Korean ships because they are consistently trying to buy sex, some women as young as 14.
--they go at it again
--2006 ecpat Korea goes over there and publishes a report. The kids servicing Korean sailors are getting younger. They do a nice photo op (being Korean) with the kids waving the Korean flag - "Thanks Korean Ecpat for saving us"
--2007 the Korean sailors are at it again, and still are.
And this only acounts for Korean bevavior on one little island with a pop. of, what, 90,000. Where's the Koean government in all of this? Where's Korea ecpat? Where's this Lee broad?
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/special/2009/05/139_45657.html
Prof. Lee Re-elected to Head UN Children Rights Committee
Prof. Lee Yang-hee
By Park Si-soo
Staff Reporter
Prof. Lee Yang-hee, 53, of Sungkyunkwan University in Seoul was reelected as chairperson of the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child, her aides said Monday.
Serving as head of the committee since 2007, Lee was reelected during its general meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, they said.
The committee is a body of independent experts that monitor abusive practices against children such as trafficking, prostitution and pornography internationally.
With the election, she is to lead the organization for another two years.
[email protected] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
madoka

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So according to a report on child trafficking in Central and South America, annually there are over 1,000,000 children exposed to commerical sexual exploitation. But since Ms. Lee is Korean, her #1 step should be to do something about Korean sailors exploiting 30-50 underage prostitutes on Kiribati? Those Koreans certainly should be punished harshly, but you sound like just another idiot with an anti-Korean axe to grind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
in_seoul_2003
Joined: 24 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Precisely! An anti-Korean axe grinding away, because we all know that out of all the nations in the world, among all the people representing these nations, this little nation, is qualified to send out one of its members to head a UN body precisely for no other reason that she is qualified. An absolutely anything to the contrary is an axe grinding away. Dipstick... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harlowethrombey

Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope she is qualified and I hope something more is done.
This is an important moral issue for the entire planet.
Although let's be honest, the U.N. hasnt exactly been much of a force for. . . anything in quite a long time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OculisOrbis

Joined: 17 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sounds like its about time that korean sailors submit health/HIV tests, drug tests and criminal record checks before boarding to sail............but that would actually make sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
harlowethrombey wrote: |
Although let's be honest, the U.N. hasnt exactly been much of a force for. . . anything in quite a long time. |
UN is a farce. Its only purpose is for parents to tell little children "Yes, there is Santa Claus and we do have a World Government".
My question for the OP, what exactly is "qualified" mean? What is your benchmark to be considered "qualified"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frankly Mr Shankly
Joined: 13 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
harlowethrombey wrote: |
Although let's be honest, the U.N. hasnt exactly been much of a force for. . . anything in quite a long time. |
UN is a farce. Its only purpose is for parents to tell little children "Yes, there is Santa Claus and we do have a World Government".
My question for the OP, what exactly is "qualified" mean? What is your benchmark to be considered "qualified"? |
That is a bit of a broad statement, and whilst I will concur that certain sections of the organisation do diddly squat, others, such as the organ my partner works for, are fighting the good fight, albeit at times against governments who are doing nothing to help the existing situation (irregular migrants in this case).
As for Koreans in the UN, there was a lot of speculation at the time of Ban's election as SG that it would mean a lot more opportunities for Koreans in the organisation, and there have been questions raised as to the qualifications that some of these people have. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let me clarify, the humanitarian aspects of the UN are great. They do great work in helping people.
The rest of the UN is a joke. UN peacekeepers? UN security council? UN regulating foreign trade? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theotherlebowski
Joined: 12 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am surprised the Mods allowed this post with the huge generalization, and with, as other posters pointed out, an anti-Korea axe to grind.
Maybe I should make a new post with "Are there any Americans qualified to even appear in the UN" and skewer John Bolton. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
madoka

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
in_seoul_2003 wrote: |
Precisely! An anti-Korean axe grinding away, because we all know that out of all the nations in the world, among all the people representing these nations, this little nation, is qualified to send out one of its members to head a UN body precisely for no other reason that she is qualified. |
Thanks for supporting my view that you are an idiot. It means a lot and really I could not have done it without you.
BTW, since you have all the answers, how would you solve the prostitution problem in Kiribati?
Since you are such an international relations expert, how would you deal with the fact that Kiribati has NO LAWS against prostitution? How would you deal with the fact that most of the prostitutes have the support and encouragement of their families? Or that by Kiribati tradition, they do not even view prostitution as a bad thing? According to Greenpeace regarding Kiribati:
"For many Pacific cultures it is not a big deal; sex, custom and fishing are all intertwined, subject to tabus. Many islanders do not view such exchanges as "prostitution". Fishing and sex have long been linked to traditions that were, in itself, not necessarily a bad thing, because everything was shared within communities and remote islands needed "new blood" to prevent inbreeding and keep the tribe strong to defend from raiding enemies. Ritual exchanges of things like fish and women kept the peace among neighbours."
Well Mr. Expert?
Or are you going to give another nonsensical, irrelevant, idiotic response? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vancouver
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
Let me clarify, the humanitarian aspects of the UN are great. They do great work in helping people.
The rest of the UN is a joke. UN peacekeepers? UN security council? UN regulating foreign trade? |
indeed |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Xuanzang

Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Location: Sadang
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
Let me clarify, the humanitarian aspects of the UN are great. They do great work in helping people.
The rest of the UN is a joke. UN peacekeepers? UN security council? UN regulating foreign trade? |
They`re good at issuing non-binding resolutions heavily watered down from their original intention. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|