View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which do you use to pluralize "octopus"? |
-i |
|
70% |
[ 17 ] |
-es |
|
20% |
[ 5 ] |
-odes |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 24 |
|
Author |
Message |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: The etymology of "Octopus" and its plurals |
|
|
Man, have I read more than I wanted to read about whether or not Octopus should be -i or -es. Wow. So, which do you prefer? For the sake of my students, I am going with -es, even though I tend to use -i a lot more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crossmr

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The plural octopi is hypercorrect, and comes from the mistaken notion that the -us in octopus is a Latin second declension ending. The word is actually treated as a third declension noun in Latin. The plural octopodes follows the Ancient Greek plural, ὀκτώποδες (oktōpodes).
Sources differ on which plurals are acceptable: Fowler�s Modern English Usage asserts that "the only acceptable plural in English is octopuses", while Merriam-Webster and other dictionaries accept octopi as a plural form. The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi, and octopodes (the order reflecting decreasing frequency of use), stating that the last form is rare.
The term octopod (either plural octopods and octopodes can be found) is taken from the taxonomic order Octopoda but has no classical equivalent, and is not necessarily synonymous (it can encompass any member of that order). The collective form octopus is usually reserved for animals consumed for food. |
Octopi is clearly wrong, but becoming "right". Much like I imagine "can't have" will be one day...
otherwise just flip a coin, roll a dice.. if the experts can't decide there is no point in forcing anyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I want to say octovagina but that's probably not it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Octopuses is correct, though it sounds silly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Arthur Dent

Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Location: Kochu whirld
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopi
I use octopi. 'es' is more fun though.
Amazing creatures. I used to dive for them. Had to stop, just too amazing an animal to fish. Beautiful to see though. Biggest I ever caught was about 20 + kilos. I saw a bigger one at about 30 metres. Wasn't going to mess with it. The beak is as hard as a birds beak. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
andrewchon

Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was octopussy... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ReeseDog

Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Location: Classified
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The word being of Greek rather than Latin origin, either octopus or octopuses is a correct plural. As has been pointed out upthread, though, through ignorance and popular use octopi is becoming acceptable as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toadhjo
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
crossmr wrote: |
Much like I imagine "can't have" will be one day... |
Could you give me an example of this? Do you have "can't have" in place of "couldn't have"?
Because saying something "I can't have this madness going on my message boards!" seems grammatically correct to be, at least in an informal context (though I'm not a grammar master by any means). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I want to be under the sea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Straphanger
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Location: Chilgok, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
ReeseDog wrote: |
The word being of Greek rather than Latin origin, either octopus or octopuses is a correct plural. As has been pointed out upthread, though, through ignorance and popular use octopi is becoming acceptable as well. |
All of you need to consult a dictionary.
m-w.com wrote: |
Main Entry:
oc�to�pus Listen to the pronunciation of octopus
Pronunciation:
\ˈ�k-tə-pəs, -ˌpu̇s\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural oc�to�pus�es or oc�to�pi Listen to the pronunciation of octopi \-ˌpī\
Etymology:
New Latin Octopod-, Octopus, from Greek oktōpous
Date:
1758
1: any of a genus (Octopus) of cephalopod mollusks that have eight muscular arms equipped with two rows of suckers ; broadly : any octopod excepting the paper nautilus2: something that resembles an octopus especially in having many centrally directed branches |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:24 am Post subject: Plurals |
|
|
What about platypus?
'Platypi' sounds better than platypuses!
From Wiki:
Quote: |
There is no universally agreed upon plural of "platypus" in the English language. Scientists generally use "platypuses" or simply "platypus". Colloquially, "platypi" is also used for the plural, although this is pseudo-Latin;[3] the Greek plural would be "platypodes". |
And how about locus, radius? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Straphanger
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Location: Chilgok, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:37 am Post subject: Re: Plurals |
|
|
chris_J2 wrote: |
And how about locus, radius? |
I don't trust any word that ends in two Is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iammac2002
Joined: 12 Jun 2009 Location: 'n Beter plek.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
I want to be under the sea. |
I have 8 pussies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Thiuda

Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"One hippopotami / Cannot get on a bus. Because one hippopotami / Is two hippopotamus." - Alan Sherman
Personally, when it comes to questions of usage, I usually go with the flow, i.e. consult a corpus. A quick check on Google lists approx. 544.000 results for Octopi, 366.000 for Octopuses, but only 21.500 for Octopodes. So, while Octopi may not be strictly speaking correct, it seems to be the most popular form.
There is a very good passage in Steven Pinker's Words and Rules which deals with Latin and Greek derived plurals. He states, "These nouns come from science and academia, and the plurals were borrowed directly from Latin or Greek together with the singulars. They must be irregular forms that are memorized as a list, not the products of a rule attaching -i or -ae, because most nouns shun these plurals except in the speech of people with an attitude.
Latin- and Greek-inspired plurals in a sense are still not part of the English language. They are not acquired as part of the mother tongue in childhood, and are uncommon in everyday speech with nonacademic adults. Instead they are learned in school together with the Pythagorean theorem and the dates of the Peloponnesian War. Since they follow no living rule, and people couldn't have memorized them unless they went to the right schools and read the right books, they are shibboleths of membership in the educated elite and gotcha! material for pedants and know-it-alls" (Pinker, 1999: pp. 54-55).
He goes on and says, "In any case, whenever pedants correct, ordinary speakers hypercorrect, so the attempt to foist "proper" Greek and Latin plurals has bred pseudo-erudite horrors such as axia (more than one axiom), peni, rhinoceri, and [octopi]. It should be "[] octopuses." The -us in Octopus is not the Latin noun ending that switches to -i in the plural, but the Greek pous (foot). The etymologically defensible octopodes is not an improvement" (ibid.).
The book also discusses irregular verbs and the rules that govern their creation and usage. I recommend it for a great read.
Pinker, S. 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Perennial, HarperCollins, NY. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|