| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
billyg
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:54 pm Post subject: *SOLD* |
 |
|
...
Last edited by billyg on Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:20 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billyg
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pamungkash
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Location: Goyang
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe its too expensive, buddy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SeoulnPepe
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Leica's were never cheap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billyg
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SeoulnPepe wrote: |
| Leica's were never cheap. |
true that... have to say, too... i've had the panasonic lx-3, as well... and despite what people say about that lx-3 being that same camera... from personal experience, i can say this definitely is not true... which brings us back to leicas not being cheap... that said, i think you definitely get what you pay for though...
and as always, the price on anything i sell here, is definitely negotiable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pamungkash
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Location: Goyang
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
just my 2cents. i thought leica d-lux 3 is similar with panasonic lx-2?
agreed that leica is nice one, but some people also said that the difference between leica d-lux 3 and panasonic lx-2 is only on the "red dots".
sorry if i'm wrong.
good luck buddy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
