Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:18 am    Post subject: Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty Reply with quote

Land Mine Treaty Won't Be Signed By Obama Administration

DESMOND BUTLER | 11/24/09 10:03 PM | AP

WASHINGTON � The Obama administration has decided not to sign an international convention banning land mines.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said Tuesday that the administration recently completed a review and decided not to change the Bush-era policy.

"We decided that our land mine policy remains in effect," he said.

More than 150 countries have agreed to the Mine Ban Treaty's provisions to end the production, use, stockpiling and trade in mines. Besides the United States, holdouts include: China, India, Pakistan, Myanmar and Russia.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., criticized the State Department's review of the land mine policy as "cursory and halfhearted."

The senator described the decision to stand fast on the current policy as "a lost opportunity .... The United States took some of the earliest and most effective steps to restrict the use of land mines. We should be leading this effort, not sitting on the sidelines."

Human rights groups had expressed hopes that the Obama administration would sign the treaty.

Stephen Goose, the director of Human Rights Watch's arms division, said he was surprised by the announcement and called it disappointing. He said that his group had been pushing the administration to conduct a review of its policy but that the administration had given no indication that one was under way.

"If one was already completed, it was not very extensive," he said.

Kelly said that the United States would send an observer group of mine experts to a review conference on the treaty in Cartegena, Colombia, next week.

A report this month by the International Campaign to Ban Landmines found that mines remain planted in the earth in more than 70 countries and killed at least 1,266 people and wounded 3,891 last year. More than 2.2 million anti-personnel mines, 250,000 anti-vehicle mines and 17 million other explosives left over from wars have been removed since 1999, the report said.
**********************************************
State Department spokesman Ian Kelly reportedly said.
Quote:
We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention.

In a bizarre irony, a reason given for not signing the treaty is "commitment to our allies," yet Iraq and Afghanistan (plus just about every other country on the planet) have both signed on to the treaty!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
[/]State Department spokesman Ian Kelly reportedly said.[/url]
Quote:
We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention.

In a bizarre irony, a reason given for not signing the treaty is "commitment to our allies," yet Iraq and Afghanistan (plus just about every other country on the planet) have both signed on to the treaty!



There's these two countries...North and South Korea. Maybe you've heard of them? South Korea is an ally of the U.S. But maybe you've heard about that too? Good good.

Now...for bonus points...what's buried in the land separating North and South Korea?


And anyway the U.S has not produced these anti-personnel landmines since 1997.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty Reply with quote

TheUrbanMyth wrote:
bacasper wrote:
[/]State Department spokesman Ian Kelly reportedly said.[/url]
Quote:
We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention.

In a bizarre irony, a reason given for not signing the treaty is "commitment to our allies," yet Iraq and Afghanistan (plus just about every other country on the planet) have both signed on to the treaty!



There's these two countries...North and South Korea. Maybe you've heard of them? South Korea is an ally of the U.S. But maybe you've heard about that too? Good good.

Now...for bonus points...what's buried in the land separating North and South Korea?

Maybe you heard...BOTH North and South Korea have signed the treaty!


Quote:
And anyway the U.S has not produced these anti-personnel landmines since 1997.

Then it is all the more bizarre that they won't sign now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
catman



Joined: 18 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama has also extended the Patriot Act.

See Neo-cons, he ain't that bad! Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
young_clinton



Joined: 09 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mines that the USA use today shut down automatically after a time period. Even Howard Stern shock jock was saying the mines the USA uses today saves military lives
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

catman wrote:
Obama has also extended the Patriot Act.

See Neo-cons, he ain't that bad! Cool


By this logic, ditto for W. Bush, liberals... Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RufusW



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
BOTH North and South Korea have signed the treaty!

Really? Source?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama, like Bush, refuses to sign Landmine Treaty Reply with quote

bacasper wrote:
TheUrbanMyth wrote:
bacasper wrote:
[/]State Department spokesman Ian Kelly reportedly said.[/url]
Quote:
We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention.

In a bizarre irony, a reason given for not signing the treaty is "commitment to our allies," yet Iraq and Afghanistan (plus just about every other country on the planet) have both signed on to the treaty!



There's these two countries...North and South Korea. Maybe you've heard of them? South Korea is an ally of the U.S. But maybe you've heard about that too? Good good.

Now...for bonus points...what's buried in the land separating North and South Korea?

Maybe you heard...BOTH North and South Korea have signed the treaty!





Actually no I haven't. And according to the sources I Googled, neither have done any such thing.

But if you have more up-to-date sources, why not post them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to wikipedia, North and South Korea have not signed the treaty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
According to wikipedia, North and South Korea have not signed the treaty.

Oops! Embarassed Never mind.

OK, N&S Korea haven't signed, but Iraq and Afghanistan have. My bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Land mines are a scourge on humanity and there is no good reason for them to be used at all. The US, Russia and others won't even sign the convention against cluster munitions (which are completely barbaric to use). I've traveled to Laos often, and there are places you can't go due to cluster bombs (dropped in the tens of millions during the Vietnam war), which continue to blow the limbs off children to this day.

Anyway, Obama has turned the Nobel peace prize he accepted into a sick joke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
Land mines are a scourge on humanity and there is no good reason for them to be used at all. The US, Russia and others won't even sign the convention against cluster munitions (which are completely barbaric to use). I've traveled to Laos often, and there are places you can't go due to cluster bombs (dropped in the tens of millions during the Vietnam war), which continue to blow the limbs off children to this day.

Anyway, Obama has turned the Nobel peace prize he accepted into a sick joke.


Obama is a sick joke.


Had you ever the benefit of the extra minute or two of prep time before action gained by hearing one of the toe poppers you laid out the night before detonated by a member of a probing party, you might appreciate the feeling of security allowed by a mined perimeter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm guessing that some of the bases in and around Iraq & Afghanistan PROBABLY have landmines around them...?? I wonder.

Anyways...what are the repursions for breaking a treaty anyways? Most of these things are purely symbolic.

When it comes to actual war...then who knows who will do what.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
I'm guessing that some of the bases in and around Iraq & Afghanistan PROBABLY have landmines around them...?? I wonder.


Guarandamntee you that's the case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International