Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

[grammar ?] won first prize VS. won the first prize

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:54 pm    Post subject: [grammar ?] won first prize VS. won the first prize Reply with quote

A student asked which sentence is correct:

He is the boy who won first prize in the contest.
He is the boy who won the first prize in the contest.

Personally, I prefer the first - but aren't they both "correct"? Can anyone
confirm this?

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Gipkik



Joined: 30 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Play around with it. He got the last piece of cake. He got the first piece of cake. She bought the first dress. She bought the last dress. She won the first prize in the contest. She won first prize.

They are both correct. She won first prize has taken on an idiomatic meaning from common usage. The former is correct as a grammatical statement, but the latter has superseded grammatical correctness and functions as a short cut/short form method of ranking. He won first prize, second prize, third prize are all acceptable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ThingsComeAround



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The article 'the' isn't necessary here.

Both are fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lifeinkorea



Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Location: somewhere in China

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it has to do with order of things or absence of. In baseball, you can steal second base, but I wouldn't say "the second base". There is only one base being stolen.

For awards and trophies, people can come in first, second, and third place. So we have 3 possible prizes and there is hierarchy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
BreakfastInBed



Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Location: Gyeonggi do

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neither is incorrect, however, they mean different things. I think of it as hierarchical versus linear order. "First prize" is the name of the top prize given in a hierarchy of prizes, whereas "the first prize" merely means the first one of however many prizes in a sequence handed out. Although you might win first prize in a competition, the first prize awarded could be third prize.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Triban



Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Location: Suwon Station

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He won first prize.

There probably isn't a rule for it, but listen to actual people actually speak English. No literate person would say He won the first prize, unless there were multiple prizes being given away and He won the first (of many) prizes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say "won first prize" to mean "came in first."

I might use "won the first prize" if I wanted to emphasize the actual prize itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiberious aka Sparkles



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Technically, it could be considered a proper noun and capitalized as "First Prize."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
spyro25



Joined: 23 Nov 2004

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is a case of phrasality of compounds - it appears that 'first prize' is now a compound noun with a single lexical meaning - this would be a relatively recent construction and i can see where the confusion from your student might come from. There has been nominalization of the typical adjective 'first'. word classes do this all the time.

'The first prize' however does not seem to be classified as such and is two composed of the adjective 'first' and the noun 'prize' in our mental lexicon that have been combined into a longer noun phrase with the determiner 'the' and the adjective modifier 'first'. This is grammatically correct of course, and is open to different modifiers such as 'the last prize' 'the booby prize' etc. You can't do that with the first sentence as 'first prize' is a single lexical item with fixed meaning.

With that in mind, native speakers almost always choose the most economical method for classificiation, so I would suggest using the first example as the better example of meaning. If you wanted to make a grammar lesson out of it, you might want to keep the second sentence in mind as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pink Freud



Joined: 27 Jan 2003
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

spyro25 wrote:
It is a case of phrasality of compounds - it appears that 'first prize' is now a compound noun with a single lexical meaning - this would be a relatively recent construction and i can see where the confusion from your student might come from. There has been nominalization of the typical adjective 'first'. word classes do this all the time.

'The first prize' however does not seem to be classified as such and is two composed of the adjective 'first' and the noun 'prize' in our mental lexicon that have been combined into a longer noun phrase with the determiner 'the' and the adjective modifier 'first'. This is grammatically correct of course, and is open to different modifiers such as 'the last prize' 'the booby prize' etc. You can't do that with the first sentence as 'first prize' is a single lexical item with fixed meaning.

With that in mind, native speakers almost always choose the most economical method for classificiation, so I would suggest using the first example as the better example of meaning. If you wanted to make a grammar lesson out of it, you might want to keep the second sentence in mind as well.


That was enlightening. Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International