View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
raewon
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:04 pm Post subject: when VS. that (multiple choice question) |
|
|
In the following passage, I'd select (b) for the answer. I think (a) sounds very awkward, but is it safe to rule out as wrong? Is there a grammar rule that could support eliminating choice (a)?
Karen West is a single parent who finds it hard to hold an office job and to put dinner on the table every night for her three kids. Usually she is so beat at the end of the day _____ she brings home chicken for them to eat. She decided that she had to do something.
(a) when
(b) that
(c) for
(d) since
Thanks for your help with this one. [/u] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
richardlang
Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say 'that'.
By the way, I read her name as Kanye West. So much for trying to read speedily....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
raewon
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for your reply. I would also... but how would I attempt to explain that "when" is wrong? I still need to convince myself of this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oskinny1

Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Location: Right behind you!
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is she beat at the time she brings chicken home (when) or she is too beat to cook so gets takeout (that)?
I think you need to ask the author what they meant first. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm guessing on this one but I think the idea here is that they want the students to use the structure
so + adjective + that clause
e.g. she is so tired that she.......
However in normal speech people often use so + adjective without a that clause,
e.g. I was so drunk last night.
If the above sentence is acceptable the second choice of 'when' must also be acceptable as in
'I was so drunk last night when I got home'
Therefore I would venture that whoever set the question thinks 'b' is the correct answer, although I think most native speakers would accept that 'a' is also possible |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:30 pm Post subject: Re: when VS. that (multiple choice question) |
|
|
raewon wrote: |
In the following passage, I'd select (b) for the answer. I think (a) sounds very awkward, but is it safe to rule out as wrong? Is there a grammar rule that could support eliminating choice (a)?
Karen West is a single parent who finds it hard to hold an office job and to put dinner on the table every night for her three kids. Usually she is so beat at the end of the day _____ she brings home chicken for them to eat. She decided that she had to do something.
(a) when
(b) that
(c) for
(d) since
Thanks for your help with this one. [/u] |
...hmm...actually, there are specific grammar rules that support all the options in this example.
Contextually, that (b), would be clearly acceptable as an adverb clause(result clause). As explained above, so + adjective + that.
However, there is no reason to assume that it couldn't also be an adverb time clause..resulting in (a) as a grammatically correct answer.
The same goes for (d) and (c)-though slightly stilted...both provide prescriptively correct adverb reason clauses.
Read - because she has to bring home chicken - she is tired.
This reading slightly changes the contextual semantics of the question, but given that either of these interpretations can be logically inferred...it would be in the best interest of the question maker(s) to revise the alternatives, or be ready to accept all answers as grammatically correct.
This type of question reminds me of similar test questions given on the TEPS exam...while TOEIC is bad...TEPS is notorious for this.
Poorly though out questions...with equally poorly thought out answer options.
If you don't mind Reawon...where are you getting these examples from....they sound eerily like TEPS exam (prep) questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
raewon
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your kind reply Cosmic Hun (and everyone for that matter).
This question came from a friend who is studying for a proficiency exam. Perhaps the questions should be worded as "Choose the best answer~".
Then again, that would just open up a larger can of worms.
These types of questions remind me of the crossword puzzles which you can "solve" and win money. The makers of the puzzles insist that there's only one "acceptable/best" answer for each clue, but ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
raewon wrote: |
Thanks for your kind reply Cosmic Hun (and everyone for that matter).
This question came from a friend who is studying for a proficiency exam. Perhaps the questions should be worded as "Choose the best answer~".
Then again, that would just open up a larger can of worms.
These types of questions remind me of the crossword puzzles which you can "solve" and win money. The makers of the puzzles insist that there's only one "acceptable/best" answer for each clue, but ... |
...ok...thanks for the reply...and as always...best of luck with your grammar adventures.
By the way...it's Cosmic Hum...not sure how the Hun thing came about...but I have seen it 2 or 3 times now...lol...maybe just a typo...no worries...back to my humming.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seonsengnimble
Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Location: taking a ride on the magic English bus
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like cosmic Hun said, either that or when work grammatically. I'd still go with that, however. In the sentence "She was so beat that she brought home chicken every night," that implies that she brought home chicken because she was tired. When doesn't really make sense. When can mean either she was tired at the time she brought home chicken or that she was tired because she brought home chicken. I can't think of anything tiring about bringing home chicken, and unless bringing home chicken is really important to her, there would be no need to include that detail in the sentence. Did she do a poor job bringing home the chicken? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
seonsengnimble wrote: |
Like cosmic Hun said, either that or when work grammatically. I'd still go with that, however. In the sentence "She was so beat that she brought home chicken every night," that implies that she brought home chicken because she was tired. When doesn't really make sense. When can mean either she was tired at the time she brought home chicken or that she was tired because she brought home chicken. I can't think of anything tiring about bringing home chicken, and unless bringing home chicken is really important to her, there would be no need to include that detail in the sentence. Did she do a poor job bringing home the chicken? |
...I think this must be a prod...lol
Hum...Hum...Hum...Hum...Hum..Hum...Hum.
As to your comment about 'when'...interesting point...and nice catch...bringing home the chicken...the joys of phraseology.
I could be going out on a limb here, as you make an interesting generalization that others may agree with, but I don't see 'when' as having the flexibility you give it...'when' isn't causal...but rather...in that sentence it might simply imply habit.
It is common enough to use simple present tense to establish habit.
If we look at the adverb time clause on its own...when she brings home the chicken...a dependent clause introduced by the subordinating conjunction (when)...followed by a simple present tense statement...she brings home the chicken.
In this light, one could simply infer that she does this every day.
However, both 'for' and 'since' would be causal, as I mentioned above...but not much is given in the context to infer how 'bringing home the chicken', as you so eloquently put it , in and of itself, would be tiring.
If only the example had been 'cake'...then she could have had her cake and eaten it, too.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I basically agree with Seonsengnimble and The Cosmic Hum. In isolation, no answer is totally grammatically incorrect.
However, this question seems to be concerned solely with context and reading comprehension. A clear understanding of the implications of the first sentence is key. Karen is having difficulty doing two things on the same day. First, working, then putting dinner on the table.
In the question, the first sentence sets up a problem, the second provides an example, the third a type of resolution (she has made a decision even if none of us know what it will entail). There is only one choice we can make for this three sentence unit to make sense: A causes B. Karen is tired at the end of the day (A), causing her to provide an inadequate dinner (B). As an example, this mirrors the order of the first sentence which established the situation.
"When" is time related and purely conjunctive. There is no causal relationship between A and B. This neither follows logically from the preceding sentence, nor explicitly details the need for resolution found in the following sentence.
Both "for" and "since," here, mean that A was caused by B. Not likely, since A occurred before B -assuming "at the end of the day" means "after work."
"That" is the only answer that means A caused B, and is the only one that renders the entire three sentence unit a unified, meaningful thought.
I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seonsengnimble
Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Location: taking a ride on the magic English bus
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
What are you guys talking about? When can be causal.
"I'm happy when I sing."
"I only sleep when I take sedatives."
"When I eat cake, I feel terrible."
Granted, when is not directly causal like since and for, but it has an element of causation. Time is implied, but the stronger sentiment is causation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
seonsengnimble wrote: |
What are you guys talking about? When can be causal.
"I'm happy when I sing."
"I only sleep when I take sedatives."
"When I eat cake, I feel terrible."
Granted, when is not directly causal like since and for, but it has an element of causation. Time is implied, but the stronger sentiment is causation. |
If you reverse that...Causation is implied, but the stronger sentiment is time...then I agree.
To be fair...I understand your explanation...perhaps I am using the term causal rather prescriptively for these examples. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|