Korean Job Discussion Forums

[bacasper]

Told ya so!

H1N1 swine flu hoax falls apart at the seams

Wednesday, January 20, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) The great swine flu hoax of 2009 is now falling apart as one country after another unloads hundreds of millions of doses of unused vaccines. No informed person wants the injection anymore, and the entire fear-based campaign to promote the vaccines has now been exposed as outright quackery and propaganda.

Even doctors are now calling the pandemic a complete hoax. As reported on FoxNews, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a leading health authority in Europe, says that drug companies "organized a 'campaign of panic' to put pressure on the WHO to declare a pandemic. He believes it is 'one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century,' and has called for an inquiry." (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933...)

H1N1 swine flu was never dangerous, and it never should have been escalated to a level-six pandemic. It was all a big marketing scam whose purpose was to simply sell vaccines. (CDC and WHO were in on it...)

And it worked! Big Pharma made out with billions of dollars in profits for a useless vaccine that's now being dumped by the truckload. These vaccines were paid for with taxpayer dollars, making the Great Swine Flu Hoax of 2009 nothing more than an elaborate financial scam whose goal was to transfer wealth from the People to the shareholders of Big Pharma.

In just the fourth quarter of 2009, GlaxoSmithKline shipped $1.4 billion worth of vaccines. (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...)

That's $1.4 billion worth of taxpayer dollars, by the way. Dollars that could have been spent on nutrition or real health education. $1.4 billion worth of free vitamin D supplements would have done far more to protect public health than vaccines ever could.
A bailout for Big Pharma
Wall Street hucksters have nothing on Big Pharma, CDC & WHO, all of which conspired to mislead the public and generate irrational fear in order to make money selling people vaccine shots they never needed in the first place.

Drug companies raked in billions while providing a product that offered absolutely no net reduction in mortality. In fact, as long-term side effects of the vaccines remain unknown, it could turn out that the vaccines actually result in increased mortality.

Meanwhile, countless people were harmed by the swine flu vaccine frenzy ("countless" because nobody's counting). In addition to those who were nearly paralyzed after receiving the vaccine shots, grade school students in Massachusetts who lined up to receive swine flu vaccine shots were instead injected with insulin. (Insulin injections can put you into a coma.) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...)

full article at link

[VanIslander]

it was obvious from day 1 to anyone using their ears and eyes, critical faculties and a little caution

[Fox]

[mises]

Who woulda thunk. Ok, me:

http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?p=2201107&highlight=swine#2201107

[bacasper]

[Ya-ta Boy]

Had the Swine Flu gone the other way and govt's not been prepared, dollars to donuts, the same posters would have been here ranting and raving about how useless gov'ts are because they didn't prepare.

It's just a little too convenient.

[visitorq]

[bacasper]

[Ya-ta Boy]

I think you need to re-read.

However, to keep to the theme of this particular thread...yet another conspiracy. Is there any actual evidence that the drug companies conspired with gov'ts on this? There is nothing in the article to support the claim.

What do you do when, to quote BD, 'your gravity fails and negativity don't pull you through". You know, " people talk of situations, repeat quotations, draw conclusions on the wall". Anyone can do that. If you want to make an accusation, it would help if you had something to back it up.

[blackjack]

[Senior]

[bacasper]

[jaykimf]

[bacasper]

[CentralCali]

YTB: You're forgetting that some people just don't understand the difference between a pandemic and an epidemic. The main difference is that one's more geographically spread than the other.