View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hindsight
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:40 am Post subject: LOTR, WTF? |
|
|
OK, I watched the first part, Fellowship of the Ring, and it made sense.
I tried watching The Two Towers, but all of the sudden there's this little CGI character bouncing around. OK, that's Gollum, I guess, though I don't remember who exactly Gollum is.
But then all these soldiers in leather show up carrying the two hobbits on their backs. I don't get it. How did that happen?
And then there is a talking tree.
And it all went down hill from there; I couldn't make any sense of the plot.
I confess I didn't read the book, but that should be obvious.
Can anyone explain it to me?
Thanks.
Nice sound effects, though. And New Zealand sure looks great! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NovaKart
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Two Towers starts off immediately where the Fellowship of the Ring left off without any introduction so that makes it a bit confusing. Gollum originally had the ring and at the beginning of Fellowship of the Ring it has a brief summary of that story and how Bilbo got it. Gollum has been trying to get the ring back ever since and now he's finally found out where Frodo is.
At the end of Fellowship of the ring, the fellowship was attacked and split up. Two of the hobbits (Merry and Pippin) were captured by the orcs. Sam and Frodo escaped alone after Boromir tried to take the ring. And Legolas, Gimli and Aragorn went to try to rescue Merry and Pippin. When the orcs were killed by the horsemen of Rohan Merry and Pippin escaped unnoticed (they're small hobbits after all and it was night).
They escaped into the forest which is really ancient and some of the trees are alive, they're really ents which are like tree people that guard the forest. Gimli, Aragorn and Legolas went into the forest looking for them but they found Gandalf who had come back from Moria after fighting the Balrog. He's a wizard so you shouldn't focus too much on how he was able to do this and then meet them in the forest.
There's sort of 3 plots going on at the same time.
I can't really remember all that happens next but there were orcs who attacked the people of Rohan who with the help of the elves were able to beat them. That's when they're holed up in the fortress.
Then the ents (tree people) are convinced by Merry and Pippin to attack Saruman and they finally agree after seeing how he tore up the forest. Saruman is the wizard who went to the evil side and has an army of orcs. They tore up his tower.
At the same time, Sam and Frodo are going to Mordor to destroy the ring and they have to put up with Gollum who shows them a secret way. Boromir's brother tries to stop them but then he eventually lets them go.
Hope that clears some things up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wintermute
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Troll! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For christ sake nova kart. Do a better job of recognizing trolls. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
emetib

Joined: 27 Dec 2009 Location: Somewhere between sanity and insanity.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hindsight
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the precis, NovaKart. I'm impressed!
OK, let's see if I've got this straight.
Gollum - Was a good guy, then got the ring and became a bad guy, then lost the ring and was an even badder guy, then met Frodo and Sam and became their buddy, or at least servant for some reason. Oh, they were going to kill him.
Merry and Pippin are good guys. Orcs are bad guys. They got captured by orcs at the end of the first movie, and so is that why they showed up being lugged around by leathermen without any context in the second movie?
I assume Boromir is a bad guy, since he tried to take the ring. Anyone who tries to take the ring is a bad guy, right?
Legolas, Gimli and Aragorn are good guys, part of the Fellowship of the Ring. The Fellowship of the Ring wants to destroy the ring. The ring is the root of all evil.
The horsemen of Rohan are good guys cause they killed the orcs, right? So that makes them friends with Legolas, Gimli and Aragorn, I guess.
Ents are good guys who look like trees.
Gandalf is a good guy who sort of died and then became a really good guy.
The elves are good guys cause they help the Rohan, who are good guys, defeat the orcs, who are bad guys.
Saruman is the biggest bad guy.
Boromir's brother is maybe a bad guy, maybe a good guy?
And then I see there's the Balrog. They must be bad guys, since Gandalf had to fight them.
Hmmm, it looks like there are more good guys than bad guys.
Good guys:
Fellowship of the Ring
Horsemen of Rohan
Ents
Elves
Trees
Trolls
Hobbits
Bad guys:
Orc
Balrog
Boromir
Saruman
Maybe good, maybe bad:
Boromir's brother
Gollum
It sure would be easier if the good guys wore white hats and the bad guys wore black hats.
Time to make some popcorn and try again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I truly suggest to read the book.
It's about how the ring corrupts (as in power corrupts) even the noblest of people.
And how the most meaningless humanoids are the most resistant to the influence and can do great deeds due to their simple love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Triban

Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Location: Suwon Station
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Juregen wrote: |
I truly suggest to read the book.
It's about how the ring corrupts (as in power corrupts) even the noblest of people.
And how the most meaningless humanoids are the most resistant to the influence and can do great deeds due to their simple love. |
GAY. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
emetib

Joined: 27 Dec 2009 Location: Somewhere between sanity and insanity.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Triban wrote: |
Juregen wrote: |
I truly suggest to read the book.
It's about how the ring corrupts (as in power corrupts) even the noblest of people.
And how the most meaningless humanoids are the most resistant to the influence and can do great deeds due to their simple love. |
GAY. |
To each his/her own. I'm of the opinion that Tolkien is a decent read, not that I am adverse to watching a CGI Gollum crying "my precioussssss" and some nice action sequences every now and then. Granted the films are long and I certainly have to make a night of it, then again I have to be in a particular mood to partake of Tolkien. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
From what I heard from Tolkien fans:
The Two Towers, in its theater release cut, is a cut to hell. I think they cut like an hour off of the movie. Thats why the pacing feels like it jumps all over the place.
To actually see what the entire movie storyline is, you have to watch the Extended movie version. Then it makes more sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NovaKart
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
He's just saying he didn't understand the movie it's not necessarily an trollish post. Even if it is, well trolls are Tolkienish so perhaps we should indulge him.
I admit his second post does sound a bit trollish. But in case it's not, Saruman isn't actually the biggest bad guy, that's Sauron. But Saruman was the main antagonist of the Two Towers I would say.
Boromir isn't exactly a bad guy, just he was tempted by the ring and thought he could use it to save his kingdom. Trolls are not really good guys in LOTR and there's only one of them shown in the movies in the first one.
I wish people wouldn't use the word gay as a synonym for something that's lame. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hindsight
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Juregen
Quote: |
I truly suggest to read the book.
It's about how the ring corrupts (as in power corrupts) even the noblest of people.
And how the most meaningless humanoids are the most resistant to the influence and can do great deeds due to their simple love. |
Actually, that makes the books sound more interesting, relative to the film. It seems the action has gotten more emphasis in the movie than the motivation. Presuming the book has more to say than just "power corrupts."
Actually, I'm watching the director's cut of the second movie.
As to being a "troll," I do look a lot like that fellow in the movie.
And I second NovaKart's last comment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol LOTR has the most obvious 'good' and 'bad' guys in movies ever.
God help you watching a movie with even a small shade of grey.
Oh yes.. and read the book. Read 'The Hobbit' first. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hindsight
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
JMO:
Quote: |
lol LOTR has the most obvious 'good' and 'bad' guys in movies ever. |
I dunno. When you see two people trying their best to kill each other, you can't really tell who the good guy is, can you? Not without a white hat. Or by understanding how they fit in to the larger context of the plot.
I guess I'm a pacifist troll. I liked the first movie, with the nice, peaceful hobbits and the beautiful farmland. The second movie seems to be unending mayhem.
I took a break from it and watched the movie Gandhi. Here it's easy to tell who the good guys are. The good guys are the ones talking about non-violence, and the bad guys are the ones killing and beating them. Gandhi used his influence to get the two sides to stop the violence.
I will give The Two Towers another try. I have the feeling there is something more to LOTR for it to have been so popular this long. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crash bang
Joined: 11 Jul 2007 Location: gwangju
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wish people wouldn't use the word gay as a synonym for something that's lame.
That's GAY . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|