| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:33 pm Post subject: Media Bias |
|
|
Here's a short article on perceived bias. The main points:
There were two mechanisms at work here:
1.The truth is black and white: partisans generally thought that the truth about the Arab-Israeli debate was black and white. Any hint of shades of grey in the news reports was interpreted by partisans as bias towards the other side. In other words: any balanced report will seem biased to partisan viewers.
2.The news report was too grey: as well as thinking the Arab-Israeli issue was either black or white, partisans also perceived that the specific news report they watched was too grey.
http://www.spring.org.uk/2010/02/why-the-media-seems-biased-when-you-care-about-the-issue.php
Posters here are always yammering about MSM bias. Does anyone have any other articles about this topic? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Happy Warrior
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is why calling out peoples' bias on the board is fairly unhelpful. Fun, but not necessarily productive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocket_scientist
Joined: 23 Nov 2009 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Yata,
I don't like article much, its a little too simple. I think what they are saying is that anything you don't see as supportive of your viewpoint is biased and that means biased against you. If a newspaper agreed with my view point I would then consider that newspaper neutral and objective.
I feel somewhat over my head - I'm not really certain what journalism is nor can I explain what truth is. Is journalism a public good? A business? What kind of business is it? Gossip business? We really have gossip journalism but how much of real journalism is gossip? Why do newspapers take positions? Is that position something we should know and if so, why? How much profound wisdom can you impart in 400 word column? Spinoza et al had to write for decades to be considered smart.
How much of journalism is trolling? Was Cronkite biased?
Concept of paper of record
[url]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper_of_record
[/url]
Gazettes = public notice
Why do we have journalism? I think largely to sell ad space else we get NPR. Ill disclude NPR for now.
I'll finish this later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocket_scientist
Joined: 23 Nov 2009 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, that article has cultural problems. The survey was culturally significant to
Israelis/Arabs and they have a different was of evaluating situations and a different set of ethics. In my opinion, those people are much more accusatory and less accepting and I think it leaves a more drastic effect and result. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I don't like article much, its a little too simple. |
Yes, it is simple. It's just summarizing some research. That's why I asked if anyone knows links to something more substantial, either supporting or conflicting with the points this article claimed.
It seems to jive with what I observed teaching high school, where people often frothed at the mouth about mediators and tried to draw lines--you're either with me or against me kind of stuff. But it didn't always happen.
You raise an interesting point. Maybe there was something cultural in the study and if the study is to have any validity, it needs to have intercultural applicability. One study does not a fact make. But it does make an interesting idea that should be followed up.
I'd like to read more on the topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|