Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

grammar question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:23 pm    Post subject: grammar question Reply with quote

Hope everyone had an enjoyable Chinese New Year's. It already seems like it was months ago.


Here's my grammar question:

Here are a few tips to make a long flight more comfortable. Place a thin facecloth over your face, and direct the air vent toward the cloth. I also like to dilute rosemary oil with water and pour it into a tiny spray bottle, then [dampening / dampen] the cloth with that.

I would choose "dampen" as the correct answer, but once again I'm at a loss when I try to explain why "dampening" can't be used. Can I use faulty parallelism as the reason?

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jiberish



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Location: The Carribean Bay Wrestler

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say dampen,

then dampen..
while dampening..

ahh I can't explain it either = /
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Globutron



Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Location: England/Anyang

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

to me, dampening implies a continuation:

'then, dampening the cloth with a sponge, the dog will become damp.'

more of a present tense feel to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
kinerry



Joined: 01 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it's a tense issue

dampen is present, dampening is present continuous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an imperative so the simple form 'dampen' rather than the progressive form 'dampening' is used.

If you want to tell someone what to do, you can use the simple form of the verb - and perhaps add the helping verb 'do' for emphasis, not that we do that much. You would say 'Please sit over there', not 'Please sitting over there', wouldn't you? (Although I've heard Koreans use the progressive as an instruction and it always sounds very odd.)

This is leaving aside the various polite constructions used to soften imperatives into requests (e.g. 'Please could you sit over there'), but the point is the progressive form is never used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crossmr



Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When writing instructions the only time you would use the progressive tense would be if two things were happening at the same time.

While holding the mattress up, tuck the corner underneath
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rusty1983



Joined: 30 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah it's the imperative

Boil the potatoes for twenty minutes

Open the window

Enter your bank details

It's an order, if you like
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edwardcatflap



Joined: 22 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not the imperative and it's not 'the present'

It's the base form of the infinitive. The speaker says earlier "I like to dilute rosmary oil etc..' then he continues to use 'pour' and 'dampen' as part of the same structure, omitting 'to',
short for " I like to pour and I like to dampen'.

'Place' is the imperative but that comes earlier before he uses the verb 'to like' which incidently can take the infinitive or the gerund . However he uses the infinitive forst with dilute so the other verbs must take the same form
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
grant gerstners



Joined: 13 Jan 2010
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:06 pm    Post subject: agreeing with edwardcatflap Reply with quote

Place a thin facecloth over your face, and direct the air vent toward the cloth.

comment: both place and direct are in the imperative.

Original: I also like to dilute rosemary oil with water and pour it into a tiny spray bottle, then [dampening / dampen] the cloth with that.


Modified as follows, to make the multiple infinitives more obvious:

I also like to dilute rosemary oil with water, to pour it into a tiny spray bottle and then to dampen the cloth with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusty1983



Joined: 30 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I was wrong, shouldve read it properly. Should probably do that more when im teaching too!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grant gerstners



Joined: 13 Jan 2010
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:17 pm    Post subject: alternatively Reply with quote

I also like diluting rosemary oil with water, pouring it into a tiny spray bottle, and then dampening the cloth with that.

Or, if you wanted to continue the prior imperative:

You might also like the following: dilute rosemary oil with water, pour it into a tiny spray bottle, and then dampen the cloth with that.

Either all infintives, all gerunds or all imperatives can make for tidier construction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edwardcatflap



Joined: 22 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strictly speaking the gerund doesn't really work in this example from a functional aspect. Like + gerund is normally used to describe something that gives a person pleasure, rather than here where the speaker is descibing an action that is useful or a good idea. For that function the infinitive is normally preferred
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International