Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Smack Down! Rachel vs Glenn: Back off!
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:15 am    Post subject: Smack Down! Rachel vs Glenn: Back off! Reply with quote

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#35431886

Someday we'll get Katy Couric smacking down Brian Williams. We can only hope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This passes for news/current affairs?

What a disgrace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, but a review of a book that isn't a review about a book you haven't read is?

"This is a review of Thomas Sowell's new book. The reviewer doesn't actually review the book... Having not read the book myself..."

I do note one bit of consistency: The clip I linked to is 8 minutes and 55 seconds long. You posted 4 minutes after I did. Unless you live in hyperspace, you didn't even watch the clip. Didn't read the book, didn't watch the clip. Yes, consistency. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I watched the first 4 minutes. That was more than enough. I wasn't referring to you posting the item as news. You have the right to post anything you please. It was not a slight towards you in any way. I was referring to the behavior of the folk in the clip.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's wrong with the behavior of the folk in the clip? It's waaaay past time that someone took on Beck.

Maddow has been on a roll lately. Last week she made a splash by showing a list of the GOP hypocrits who bashed the stimulus then went to their district and touted how many jobs it would create, then she embarrassed that dude from Illinois on Face the Nation for doing it, now she's challenged Beck. These are things the MSM should have been doing all last year.

In an ideal world you would have educated, mature and civil political leaders. We don't live in an ideal world, and never have. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison are in the running for most vicious campaigners in the history of the republic. For better or worse, we have a two party system. The Dems need to get a LOT more aggressive in how they present their message and in taking down the opposition when it acts irresponsibly. It is primarily the administration's job, but it is good that Maddow and Stewart/Colbert lend a hand. The NYT has finally started to show some gumption with their 'Rebellion on the Right' article. They and the rest of the 'responsible' media need to be more active.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mindless crap, not even worth the time it took to open up the link.

Glenn Beck and Rachel Maddow are nothing but disgustingly overpaid talking heads trying desperately to keep themselves relevant by framing every issue as left vs. right (when it isn't), and then "attacking" each other so their brainwashed audiences will pick sides. In fact these two corporate shills need each other, otherwise they'd both be out a job.

Not only is it not entertaining to watch (unless Glenn Beck acting like a clown, and Rachel Maddow chuckling at her own lame-ass jokes is your kind of thing), it's a just a big distraction. Only someone like ya-ta would take this kind of crap seriously.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
What's wrong with the behavior of the folk in the clip? It's waaaay past time that someone took on Beck.



This is entertainment in the style of WWF. The news and the people who cover it are basically a circus. It's purely for fun and entertainment. But life isn't a circus, it's fairly serious stuff a lot of the time. Yet this is the place where 99% of people get 99% of their info about what is happening in the world. This isn't news it's a disgrace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm...at first I thought I should comment on the problem you must have watching Stewart/Colbert, then I realized that is not the real issue. The real issue is that you know Maddow caught Beck out and you don't want to admit it, so you try to change the topic to entertainment vs news.

Carry on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Hmmm...at first I thought I should comment on the problem you must have watching Stewart/Colbert, then I realized that is not the real issue. The real issue is that you know Maddow caught Beck out and you don't want to admit it, so you try to change the topic to entertainment vs news.

Carry on.


Yup. That must be it. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senior wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Hmmm...at first I thought I should comment on the problem you must have watching Stewart/Colbert, then I realized that is not the real issue. The real issue is that you know Maddow caught Beck out and you don't want to admit it, so you try to change the topic to entertainment vs news.

Carry on.


Yup. That must be it. Rolling Eyes

Don't worry, Ya-ta just likes to come on here and post his inane point of view a few times per day and pretend he's preaching to the choir. But most people know his credibility is nil on most issues. He gets flat-out refuted all the time by many posters, but he doesn't actually read their replies (instead he just posts more of the same crap).

No big deal. Trying to get through to someone that brainwashed is like peeing in wind. You can't teach an old dog new tricks (others lurking this forum agree with you though).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
Senior wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Hmmm...at first I thought I should comment on the problem you must have watching Stewart/Colbert, then I realized that is not the real issue. The real issue is that you know Maddow caught Beck out and you don't want to admit it, so you try to change the topic to entertainment vs news.

Carry on.


Yup. That must be it. Rolling Eyes

Don't worry, Ya-ta just likes to come on here and post his inane point of view a few times per day and pretend he's preaching to the choir. But most people know his credibility is nil on most issues. He gets flat-out refuted all the time by many posters, but he doesn't actually read their replies (instead he just posts more of the same crap).

No big deal. Trying to get through to someone that brainwashed is like peeing in wind. You can't teach an old dog new tricks (others lurking this forum agree with you though).


Ha, I know all too well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kabrams



Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Location: your Dad's house

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Hmmm...at first I thought I should comment on the problem you must have watching Stewart/Colbert, then I realized that is not the real issue. The real issue is that you know Maddow caught Beck out and you don't want to admit it, so you try to change the topic to entertainment vs news.

Carry on.


Haters gonna hate, Ya-ta.

It's called The Rachel Maddow Show not Fox News.




OHSHI-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not going to watch it.

RM is an establishment progressive. She's fairly good about the banks etc but she is completely unable to understand that there is no money for "social programs". Like it or not, social security/medistuff will not be paid. Full stop. Final answer.

GB is an anti-establishment (though useful for the Republicans) firestarter. He's good on the banks, inflation and the rest. But he has too much fear in him. It makes him seem unhinged. I agree with him that the family is the basis of civilization (not the state). I agree about global warming. I agree with him about inflation, the fed, civil liberties.

Both are useless for any meaningful discussion about the impending funding crisis. RM will not understand that top and bottom vs the middle is killing the country. GB frets about the New World Order and similar.

It is like Hulk Hogan vs Andre the Giant. Kinda interesting but ultimately pointless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, having watched the entire clip made by Rachel Maddow, and not being a fan of Beck, it was amazing to find that the clip made by Maddow actually supports Beck's claim that Maddow is a liar.

The quotes from Beck that Maddow showed do not show Beck claiming that there is no global warming and do not show Beck claiming that the snow proves there is no global warming. He does use this winter's record cold and snow to make ironic jokes and to imply that there may be no global warming but he also asserts that one storm proves nothing. She played these clips but apparently she lacks the logical reasoning capacity to understand the totality of the message.

It's true of course that Beck was implying that record cold and snowfall casts doubt on global warming - and it does - but he acknowledges that one storm proves nothing. He knows, of course, that for some less educated and lower IQ members of his audience such an implication will convince them that global warming does NOT exist, but that itsn't what he said.

There is a final irony to this story.

The final irony is that not only do many of Glen Beck's fans lack the reasoning capacity to discern the actual meaning of the commments being made by Beck, it turns out that many of Maddow's viewers also lack the wit to discern the actual meaning, including Maddow herself.


I take it back. Maddow didn't lie - her IQ is so low that intellectual discourse coupled with ironic humor is beyond her ken. She's too stupid to understand the meaning of the words that were spoken.


"My momma says that life is like a box of chocolates."

Gee, yer smart. You shud hav a show on da teevee or da raadio.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Old Gil



Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Location: Got out! olleh!

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How does one winter's worth of cold and snow--that happened to fall in heavily populated and media saturated regions of the world--cast doubt on global warming? If you look at the data it's still ridiculously hot in the lesser populated areas of the world, the only thing is that there's no one living there to entice ad dollars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International