View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Drew345

Joined: 24 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:22 am Post subject: Korean Army Exemption for "son of a son"? |
|
|
A Korean friend told me that his son is exempt from Korean Army duty because he is a "son of a son". I thought about it a second and realized that every man is a son of a son. I mean, we all have a father who has a father. So I thought maybe he meant oldest son of oldest son, or only son of only son. But my friend has two older brothers, so both of those are out. This is bugging me a bit, anyone know about the Korean Army exemption for "son of a son"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pink Freud
Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure it's only son of an only son or something like that.
Preserving the family lineage. They do civil duty instead, I believe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So this means Jesus would have to serve, but not his his son if he had one? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zappadelta

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's like the Fortunate Son thing. Those who are really rich don't have to serve in the army, they get some other duty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^...yes...I've heard the translation is more like...a son of god.
Money and power protecting the son from serving. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard it goes 2 or 3 (not sure which) generations of only having one son. So if you're the only son of a line of one son families, you still have to serve, but you get a very easy assignment, like pushing papers at the local administration office.
As for the rich, it depends. If you're a rich Korean who has any political aspirations you'd better make sure your sons serves. A former presidential candidate had 3 sons that were all exempt from service for pretty dubious reasons. One of the contributing factors for him losing the election. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
It could be that your friend was trying to use the expression 'a general's son' which refers to rich kids/sons of gov't officials who have a knack for finding ways around their military obligation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drew345

Joined: 24 May 2005
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, thanks for the information. I'll have to ask my friend about it again. He and his son sure aren't rich; teaching music to grade school kids. I tried explaining that every man is a "son of a son" but I couldn't make that point (without pen and paper anyway). Not important, just something to talk about. Maybe I'll try discussing it in Korean for even more fun! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Koreans are only having 1 or 2 kids these days. There must be loads of males who are the "only son". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
Koreans are only having 1 or 2 kids these days. There must be loads of males who are the "only son". |
Yes, I also believe the rule is no longer applied anymore, but was in the 80's. But then again, this generation, and the previous, is probably the first few generations with significant numbers of only sons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
greasypeanut
Joined: 28 Apr 2009 Location: songtan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
^...yes...I've heard the translation is more like...a son of god.
Money and power protecting the son from serving. |
ive heard it this way also "son of god"
and my "son of god" friend is like that because he has something wrong with his ankle, something hes had since birth. but its funny cuz hes still able to skateboard daily on full size halfpipes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
^...yes...I've heard the translation is more like...a son of god.
Money and power protecting the son from serving. |
Why is it then that Prince Harry and William had to serve in Afghanistan?
I guess because in the west those in positions of privelege and power are expected to act as an example to others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mariner
Joined: 24 Apr 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
The Cosmic Hum wrote: |
^...yes...I've heard the translation is more like...a son of god.
Money and power protecting the son from serving. |
Why is it then that Prince Harry and William had to serve in Afghanistan?
I guess because in the west those in positions of privelege and power are expected to act as an example to others. |
Is that why George W. Bush served in Texas and didnt get shipped to 'Nam? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bloopity Bloop

Joined: 26 Apr 2009 Location: Seoul yo
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why do celebs serve if money gets you off the hook? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CapnSamwise
Joined: 11 Jan 2010
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it only works if you're the son of a son, son of a son, son of a son of a sailor
djsmnc wrote: |
So this means Jesus would have to serve, but not his his son if he had one? |
pfft everyone knows jesus had like thirty daughters. how else do you explain the french kings?
(note to the retarded: this is a joke on the idea of the Merovingian dynasty, which you are probably familiar with through the Matrix. HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|