View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cerberus
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just proof that consumers have a notoriously poor ability to actually estimate the financial value of a product, especially when paying for it with a loan. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pink

Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tuition for my first year at university in Canada was $2500 back in 1992. I went back to university over 10 years later. In 2006, tuition for a full year was around $5500.
Same education. Same stuff being taught.
The salary of the staff did not double. The income of new graduates did not double.
WTF - how could the price of tuition more than double?
It is a bad investment these days. I really wish I had just done all the studying I ever wanted to do back in the days when it was CHEAP. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Street Magic
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Pink wrote: |
WTF - how could the price of tuition more than double? |
Because like the case with the increasing taxes imposed over the years on cigarettes not affecting sales much (if at all), it's been found that there's an inelastic demand for tuition too. If the same number of consumers are apparently willing to pay more money for the same product, it's not too surprising that the pushers are going to take advantage of that. The whole loans issue probably plays a huge role too in that so many students are already so far in debt that the accumulation of further debt doesn't really mean anything anymore. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hear me out as my position is somewhat of a shade of grey.
On one side, whether I'm seen as elitist or not, it's a tech magazine and I don't have confidence that they know beans about what they're talking about. There are certainly trades such as business and possibly IT where a self-starter can get ahead with ambition and work. You do not become a nurse, botany professor, or mechanical engineer by being a self-starter. There is a whole complex of careers which involve years of disciplined study and which can't be compensated for by pluck alone. I want the person operating on my heart to have passed his or her exams, not to be some Sarah Palin - Bill Gates hybrid there because of his can-do spirit.
Second, it's somewhat true that north American universities have been too eager to raise tuition rather than operate efficiently, but by and large tuitions have rocketed not out of administrative greed but because transfer payments to universities have continually shrunk. As governments give less and less to universities, the only way to stay in operation is to look for other sources of revenue, or shut down (and some have shut down). We blame universities where we ought to blame governments for not supporting higher education. If we think that governments shouldn't support higher ed that's fine, but we should be clear on that position.
On the other hand, I do think that universities have done a fairly poor job at transitioning to a post-industrial, knowledge-based economy, and are still using a university system that's part medieval and part 19th-century Harvard. You pull in youngsters (like me) by telling them that society will respect and value their degrees in Victorian literature when they're too young to understand the fiscal realities of what they're borrowing for it. In the next decade or two we're likely going to see a sort of realignment where more people wise up and refuse to pay these sorts of tuitions, going instead to community colleges or tech & trade schools. We've recently seen proof that these statistics traditionally trotted out that graduates make more over a lifetime aren't true. I've spent two decades in and out of university half-starved, all so I can teach in Korea because there's no jobs back home. My friend who became an airplane mechanic is raking it in.
This is just my half-arsed idea, but one idea I've thought about for years is that high school should go to grade 14 or 15. This would prepare students better and would allow them to go to a wider variety of post-secondary places, or none at all. Sometimes I have to admit that maybe just too many people are going to college. Definitely too many people are going to grad school. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CapnSamwise
Joined: 11 Jan 2010
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
sounds like a bunch of east coast ivory tower intellectuals whining that Real Americans won't pay for their fancy-schmancy degrees in "gay stuff" and "engineering" or whatever.
psh like that'll get you a job in the factory. next your gonna tell me that an educated populace is better able to self-govern and make good decisions voting. all the learning you nerds ever need is in the Fox News! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
sounds like a bunch of east coast ivory tower intellectuals whining that Real Americans won't pay for their fancy-schmancy degrees in "gay stuff" |
We prefer to call it "Fabulous Studies," thank you.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|