View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Olivencia
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:44 pm Post subject: Why doesn't Korea advertise Cheju better?? |
|
|
in the sense of a tourist destination? When I was there it was nice so I'm guessing it couldn't have changed (for the worse) that much. Why not do a better job advertising it?
And if it isn't that great then clean it up and make it better! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
because Jeju has nothing going for it except that it's convenient for Koreans.
It has the the beaches, but no significant draws for international tourists. It doesn't even have any good shopping.
For this reason, it can't compete for international tourists with Thailand or even the Philippines. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good question and good answer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
.......... though it seems like I heard 2 years ago they were designating it a special zone where they would have casinos-they wanted to tout it as a cross between Hawaii and Las Vegas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't love it, but I liked Jeju-do. It's pretty and the climate isn't Bali but it gives an extra stretch of nice weather in the spring and fall.
For me, what Jeju needs to make it international tourist friendly is food. A third of the reason I go on southeast Asian holidays is to have something -- anything -- beside Korean food 24/7. Walk down a street in Bali and there will be restaurants serving every type of cuisine from Mexican to Turkish. Walk down a street in Jeju and there will be ten restaurants all serving fish.
Combine this with casinos, as tacky as they are, with a golf course or two, add in some shopping malls and some fun street markets, and it will be a decent holiday destination. Maybe in our childrens' time it will happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The powers to be have been trying to promote Jeju for YEARS! And then some. They come up with some promotion year after year and nothing works....for that matter...the whole of korea. Sure many tourists' visit korea...but very very few come back for a second visit. Tourism numbers are inflated in my opinion...they count the returning "visa run" teachers to run up the numbers to look good as well! The majority of tourist are male and after visiting korea...they return again and again to the P.I or Thailand...not back korea as much.
I don't know why korea can't attract the numbers like France, England, Australia and on and on...
China had 22 million in 2006! Korea...6 million for 2008.
Must be a reason...anyone know?
Jeju gets around 500~600 thousand a year....and how many millions in SK?!?
Not many visiting it seems.
Last edited by hellofaniceguy on Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyplace that you tout as being "The ///// of (someplace)" such as "The Hawaii of Korea" is never going to attract people like the ///// place is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djsmnc wrote: |
Anyplace that you tout as being "The ///// of (someplace)" such as "The Hawaii of Korea" is never going to attract people like the ///// place is. |
No, but it depends on who you market it to. For the traveler on a budget and who lives in this region it nay be attractive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
curiousaboutkorea

Joined: 21 Jan 2009
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
djsmnc wrote: |
Anyplace that you tout as being "The ///// of (someplace)" such as "The Hawaii of Korea" is never going to attract people like the ///// place is. |
haha great point!
I think it's so funny when I hear these comparisons. I remember being at a guesthouse in Gyeongju and a Korean woman was speaking to some other English teachers traveling around Korea on summer break. The teachers mentioned they were going to some random coastal city. The Korean woman said, "Oh! They call that the 'Florence of Korea!'"
I also remember reading this. "Paju is the Boston of Korea."
http://en.paju.go.kr/en/en_government/en_vision/en_vision_goal/en_vision_goal.cms second paragraph from the bottom.
And don't forget Ulsan, 'the Detroit of Korea.' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
[edit]
Last edited by Moldy Rutabaga on Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cerberus
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
it's a hopeless and useless task.
the main reason, even more so than food, much more so than food
is - geography.
if they want to market it as a tourist destination, it can't compete in terms of weather, beauty and amenities with its competitors in SE Asia -
e.g. Phillippines, Thailand. I'd even prefer to go the Chinese southern island .. Hainan?
what Western tourist, if they're already flying 12 plus hours to get here will take Jeju over those destinations???
and what local tourist will go there?
the only possibility I could think of would be Japanese tourists.. and the won would have to weaken a bit more vs the yen (it's already dirt cheap) to really draw some numbers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. It hasn't been spelled "Cheju" since the new romanization over 7 years ago.
2. Over 8 million people visited Jeju in 2008. Tourism is alive and well.
3. The province of Jeju is now totally self governing and is using the streamlined paperwork (of not having to get approvals and processes through Seoul ) to speed up and simplify foreign investment procedures.
4. The residents are split on the idea of casinos for Koreans, nearly half thinking it a bad idea and a third thinking it a good idea, according to a survey conducted last year. This year the decision will be made whether to allow Koreans inside the presently-foreigners' only casinos. The horsetrack is packed on a winter Saturday, not with tourists but with locals, and gambling is a source of much social tension, the locals realizing that the horsetrack which was meant to draw tourists is actually siphoning family income from the island residents. The fear is that a Koreans-allowed casino would do likewise.
5. I was at the home opener of the Jeju United K-league soccer team today and despite 3000 won tickets the World Cup stadium was only 10% full. The island has plenty of unused capacity. I have only lived here two months but if the plethora of hotels and museums and restaurants are to make any money it must be during the more touristy months of the year.
6. Jeju as a tourist destination is for the Chinese (Beijing and Shanghai) and the Japanese (Tokyo) in addition to the Koreans, and it is to East Asians that the future of Jeju tourism lies, and as such, bodes well enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Happy Warrior
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dev wrote: |
because Jeju has nothing going for it except that it's convenient for Koreans.
It has the the beaches, but no significant draws for international tourists. It doesn't even have any good shopping.
For this reason, it can't compete for international tourists with Thailand or even the Philippines. |
Like Van Islander said, Jeju is very popular among the Chinese. That should really be enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
The island is also primed to become an international convention centre. It has the basic infrastructure: airport, roads, hotels, local labour, even a few convention halls with more to be built. Some international sporting events are already held there (eg., Asia's only triathlon world championship circuit qualifying race). With the wind and beaches the growing popularity of kiteboarding could mean such a competition could be hosted, but this idea unlike the others is just mine, haven't heard anything about that.
And a major hi-tech research company bought up a few acres on the lower north face of Halla overlooking Jeju-si. The island has four universities and plans to increase its intellectual capital.
There really is a bright future for the island.
(BTW, the residents are fuming at the unilateral Seoul decision to put a naval base on Jeju, which does not help the other uses of the island being developed and sought after.)
If you want an island in Korea with gigantic development projects for tourism and industry look at Korea's second largest island: Geoje! The 50+ km bridge from Busan will be completed soon and there are a few four star hotels popping up on the island, beaches being renovated amazingly with first class tourist facilities, major road projects and a thriving billion dollar shipbuilding industry (Daewoo and Samsung shipyards). Geoje will soon be the new Jeju. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
My 2 cents, but if I were the Korean gov., I wouldn't develop it to be an international destination anyway because
1) For the obvious reason of not spoiling its serenity for both the current tourist traffic and the residents of the island.
2) It would be a terrible waste to build an infrastucture (like more big hotels and attractions for foreign tourists) and have it go to waste 30 or 50 years from now when the international oil supply gets low or runs out and plane tickets become affordable only to the elite.
Jeju will be able to carry on as a still affordable destination for Koreans simply because it's so close. Rich Koreans may be able to fly. Others will be able to take a ferry.
As for the realier comment by VanIslander
"BTW, the residents are fuming at the unilateral Seoul decision to put a naval base on Jeju, which does not help the other uses of the island being developed and sought after."
The residents, worried about the effects of a military base on their livlihood, have to understand that the gov. is likely on their side because, they collect taxes from Jeju's tourist industry and also want Koreans to spend their money in Korea. I doubt Seoul would risk harming Jeju's tourist industry just so its soldiers can have a beach to relax on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|