Korean Job Discussion Forums

[bacasper]

Can I be the one to choose which populations to reduce?

Analysis posted Mar 06 2010, 9:04 PM

Bill Gates talks about 'vaccines to reduce population'

by F. William Engdahl, Author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order

Microsoft founder and one of the world�s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy�population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.

Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, �Innovating to Zero!.� Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, "First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth. When Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he speaks with authority. In January 2010 at the elite Davos World Economic Forum, Gates announced his foundation would give $10 billion (circa �7.5 billion) over the next decade to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world. 2

The primary focus of his multi-billion dollar Gates Foundation is vaccinations, especially in Africa and other underdeveloped countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a founding member of the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization) in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and the vaccine industry. The goal of GAVI is to vaccinate every newborn child in the developing world.

Now that sounds like noble philanthropic work. The problem is that the vaccine industry has been repeatedly caught dumping dangerous�meaning unsafe because untested or proven harmful�vaccines onto unwitting Third World populations when they cannot get rid of the vaccines in the West. Some organizations have suggested that the true aim of the vaccinations is to make people sicker and even more susceptible to disease and premature death.

Dumping toxins on the Third World

In the aftermath of the most recent unnecessary Pandemic declaration of a global H1N1 swine flu emergency, industrial countries were left sitting on hundreds of millions of doses of untested vaccines. They decided to get rid of the embarrassing leftover drugs by handing them over to the WHO which in turn plans to dump them for free on select poor countries. France has given 91 million of the 94 million doses the Sarkozy government bought from the pharma giants; Britain gave 55 million of its 60 million doses. The story for Germany and Norway is similar.5

As Dr. Thomas Jefferson, an epidemiologist with the Cochrane Research Center in Rome noted, �Why do they give the vaccines to the developing countries at all? The pandemic has been called off in most parts of the world. The greatest threat in poor countries right now is heart and circulatory diseases while the virus figures at the bottom of the list. What is the medical reason for donating 180 million doses?� 6 As well, flu is a minor problem in countries with abundant sunshine, and it turned out that the feared H1N1 Pandemic �new great plague� was the mildest flu on record.

more at link

[Fox]

When I read the Bill Gates quote the article writes out, my first thought is that he intends the reproductive services (i.e. birth control and education regarding its use) to be what reduces the rate of population increase (not reduce the population itself, mind you, simply the rate at which it's expanding in that area), while he intends the health services and vaccines to reduce the mortality rate of those who are actually born and help ensure they live better lives.

Let's get real. If incredibly wealthy men like Bill Gates wanted to simply kill people in the third world, he could do far better than slightly reducing the rate of population increase via tainted vaccines. He has the resources to do some serious damage, and the resources to cover up his complicity in that damage as well. But he doesn't, because he's not some sociopathic murderer, but rather simply a wealthy man trying to help as best he can.

As far as "Why donate the left-over vaccine to the third world?" goes, why not donate it? Swine flu might not be the horrific epidemic people were scared into thinking it was, but it's still by no means a pleasant experience, and just like the normal flu, it still does have the potential to kill elderly or young people who don't have access to proper medical care. Why not donate left-over vaccine to the third world? If they don't want it, they don't have to use it. It's not like we're going to fly around shooting them with vaccine darts out of air guns.

[Street Magic]

[nautilus]

Obviously the global population needs to be reduced.

If nobody will do it voluntarily or implement a program, then it will be forced to happen via large-scale wars over dwindling resources.

More people=more human suffering.

[Fox]

[nautilus]

[Street Magic]

[kabrams]

[Fox]

[nautilus]

[djsmnc]

[Goon-Yang]

Humans are too stupid, lazy and greedy to care about the environment. Who cares right? It's not our problem. Let our grandkids deal with it, if the world is around that long;)

[jvalmer]

[Beeyee]

[nautilus]