| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:24 pm Post subject: CNN loses, Fox wins |
|
|
What is the significance of this?
CNN Loses Half Its Viewers In A Year
CNN Fails to Stop Fall in Ratings
By BILL CARTER
Published: March 29, 2010
CNN continued what has become a precipitous decline in ratings for its prime-time programs in the first quarter of 2010, with its main hosts losing almost half their viewers in a year.
The trend in news ratings for the first three months of this year is all up for one network, the Fox News Channel, which enjoyed its best quarter ever in ratings, and down for both MSNBC and CNN.
CNN had a slightly worse quarter in the fourth quarter of 2009, but the last three months have included compelling news events, like the earthquake in Haiti and the battle over health care, and CNN, which emphasizes its hard news coverage, was apparently unable to benefit.
The losses at CNN continued a pattern in place for much of the last year, as the network trailed its competitors in every prime-time hour. (CNN still easily beats MSNBC in the daytime hours, but those are less lucrative in advertising money, and both networks are far behind Fox News at all hours.)
more at link |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no reason to watch CNN. While it is the least biased of the cable news networks, it also just covers the news on a superficial level. When have CNN reporters uncovered anything? Why would anyone feel compelled to get their news from CNN instead of any other news source? Maybe if CNN put more effort and money into investigative reporting or something along those lines, it would have more success.
That being said, I guess the BBC is similar yet I'll take the BBC any day over CNN. I don't know why that is really. The accents perhaps.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dunno. I guess I could spend time listening to Wolf call me a racist for disagreeing with Obama.
CNN is the least partisan. It is typical crap though. MSNBC is for the D and Fox for the R. CNN is without a demographic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| There is no reason to watch CNN. While it is the least biased of the cable news networks, it also just covers the news on a superficial level. |
Exactly so. If a news organization isn't going to be propaganda designed to pander to a particular political base, then they really need quality, in-depth reporting to make up for it.
Personally I like NPR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| There is no reason to watch CNN. While it is the least biased of the cable news networks, it also just covers the news on a superficial level. |
Exactly so. If a news organization isn't going to be propaganda designed to pander to a particular political base, then they really need quality, in-depth reporting to make up for it.
Personally I like NPR. |
Yeah, both CNN and Fox are pretty worthless.
I like WBAI and Democracy Now! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fox wrote: |
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| There is no reason to watch CNN. While it is the least biased of the cable news networks, it also just covers the news on a superficial level. |
Exactly so. If a news organization isn't going to be propaganda designed to pander to a particular political base, then they really need quality, in-depth reporting to make up for it.
Personally I like NPR. |
Yes, NPR is good. And it does lean to the left, but at least it tries to be balanced. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| Fox wrote: |
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| There is no reason to watch CNN. While it is the least biased of the cable news networks, it also just covers the news on a superficial level. |
Exactly so. If a news organization isn't going to be propaganda designed to pander to a particular political base, then they really need quality, in-depth reporting to make up for it.
Personally I like NPR. |
Yes, NPR is good. And it does lean to the left, but at least it tries to be balanced. |
NPR is no better. Their format is different, and so their delivery is different, but they have all of the same left, PC slant as most other networks. It happens, even on Fox. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|