View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:26 am Post subject: How does one explain (grammar) |
|
|
the reason for the difference between positive and negative... whatever it's called:
'this is the MOST expensive' and 'this is the cheapEST'
A kid asked why it isn't 'the expensivest' and I was just like '...because be quiet' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
air76
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
In general adjectives that are 3 syllables or more use "more" or "most".....2 syllable adjectives (generally ending in -y) can use either/or, and one syllable adjectives always use "er" or "est".....that is a very basic explanation....but considering that you called comparatives and superlatives "positive and negative" maybe simpler is better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TDC troll
Joined: 03 Feb 2009 Location: TDC
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
OMG
I always thought that Brits had better grammar than us Yanks.
That's what I get for thinking ,huh. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Old fat expat

Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Location: a caravan of dust, making for a windy prairie
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
if true  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
TDC troll wrote: |
OMG
I always thought that Brits had better grammar than us Yanks.
That's what I get for thinking ,huh. |
Don't be as stupid as me. half of England is pretty much illiterate.
Thanks for the patronising responses guys, anyway. it must feel good to know more than someone else.
Last edited by Globutron on Thu May 06, 2010 6:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
air76
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
TDC troll wrote: |
OMG
I always thought that Brits had better grammar than us Yanks.
That's what I get for thinking ,huh. |
Why would you assume that British people have better grammar than Americans? I am not being a dick, just wondering what your logic is behind this statement. Although that being said I have found the Australian grasp of grammar at times to be lacking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TDC troll
Joined: 03 Feb 2009 Location: TDC
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not to be patronising, really.
Just kind of thought that, if you're teaching English (I assume)
than you should probably know some basic grammar.
No disrespect , my Mom's side of the family is from Scotland.
One of my Aunts was always ragging that the British had better
use of grammar than the people in the states. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ruthdes

Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
air76 wrote: |
TDC troll wrote: |
OMG
I always thought that Brits had better grammar than us Yanks.
That's what I get for thinking ,huh. |
Why would you assume that British people have better grammar than Americans? I am not being a dick, just wondering what your logic is behind this statement. Although that being said I have found the Australian grasp of grammar at times to be lacking. |
That's b/c they don't teach us (Aussies) grammar in school. I knew SFA about grammar before I came to teach here. I could explain a noun, adjective and verb, and maybe an adverb if you were lucky. I had no idea about progressive and perfect tenses. Superlatives...what were they!? Conditionals? Imperatives? Passive voice? Really, my technical knowledge of the mechanics of language was almost non-existent. This was probably reinforced by the fact that I really had no opportunity to learn a foreign language at school, so I missed that grammar education too.
In my first 6 months in Korea, I probably increased my knowledge by a factor of 10, if not more. Now, having said that, not knowing the rules didn't stop me from being able to write pretty damn well. I got straight A pluses in year 12 English. But just because you don't know what a superlative is, or how to explain the rules, doesn't mean that you have bad grammar, you're illiterate, or you can't write. It just makes it hard to teach those students who MUST have a rule for everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ruth, that's pretty much exactly what I was going to say.
I don't know a particularly vast amount of the terminology, because in England, these things aren't (or weren't in my upbringing) taught very thoroughly. However, being a native speaker, one will know how things work - simply because.
I actually have a better grasp of grammar than the two English master degree friends of mine who often send me their work to check through, simply because I have more of a feeling for how things should read, without actually knowing *why*.
I'm aware that forums are a breeding ground for those with a superiority requisite, but come into my lessons for a while and note my abilities compared to the abilities necessary to teach English before thinking up the line 'I sure hope you're not an English teacher lolz'. I'm getting paid for having a degree in anything, being blonde and slim. Being good at English is a bonus.
(This is generally a lecture towards the majority on here that are like this, rather than the guys up there.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
beeedeeewong
Joined: 26 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol because of OP's response - "Because... just be quiet." A great tactic I frequently use myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|