Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Repubs & Lieberman Oppose Miranda Rights Even for Citize

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2010 4:16 pm    Post subject: Repubs & Lieberman Oppose Miranda Rights Even for Citize Reply with quote

Article here.

Quote:
Nevertheless, Republicans are rushing out their same playbook in the case of Times Square bombing plot suspect Faisal Shahzad:

Quote:
� �I think obviously that [mirandizing Shahzad] would be a serious mistake until we�ve � at least until we find out as much information as we have, and there are ways � legal ways � of delaying that.� � Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)

� �I hope that [Attorney General Eric] Holder did discuss this with the intelligence community. If they believe they got enough from him, how much more should they get? Did they Mirandize him? I know he�s an American citizen but still.� � Rep. Peter King (R-NY)


This morning on Fox News, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) suggested that Congress should perhaps create a process to strip �American citizens who choose to become affiliated with foreign terrorists� of their citizenship and, therefore, their Miranda rights. It�s unclear how this would be accomplished, however, since such a process would also presumably involve some sort of due process:

Joe Liberman wrote:
Some of us have started to talk about it here, which is that there is an existing law � which hasn�t been much used � that says if an American citizen is shown to be fighting in a military force that is an enemy of the United States, then that person loses their citizenship and they no longer have the rights of citizenship. That�s an old law that was adopted during a very different time of conflict.

I think it�s time for us to look at whether we want to amend that law to apply it to American citizens who choose to become affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations, whether they should not also be deprived automatically of their citizenship, and therefore be deprived of rights that come with that citizenship when they are apprehended and charged with a terrorist act.


This is ridiculous. Opposing the reading of Miranda Rights to United States Citizens charged with a crime? Suggesting that citizens who are charged with a particular type of crime should be automatically stripped of their citizenship in order to deny them their rights?

What's wrong with these guys. Even Glenn Beck isn't this crazy:

Quote:
This morning on Fox and Friends, Napolitano said that Shahzad needed to be mirandized, and Beck added, �He�s a citizen of the United States, so I say we uphold the laws and the Constitution on citizens.� When Fox and Friends host Brian Kilmeade interjected, �But he�s a threat to the country. That�s different,� Beck responded, �So are a lot of citizens of the country. � We don�t shred the Constitution when it�s popular.�
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And yet they are blocking a bill that would prevent anyone on the FBI's terrorist watch list from buying firearms or explosives.

Soooo taking away your citizenship w/out due process is ok, but taking away your 2nd amendment rights isn't?? What a bunch of fubars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Joe Lieberman bill would strip suspects' citizenship

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) thinks he�s found a work-around on the whole Miranda rights debate for U.S. citizens accused of terrorism: Strip their citizenship and ship them to Guantanamo.

Lieberman plans to introduce a bill that would amend a decades-old law aimed at yanking citizenship from U.S. citizens who fight for a foreign military.

�I�m now putting together legislation to amend that to [specify that] any individual American citizen who is found to be involved in a foreign terrorist organization, as defined by the Department of State, would be deprived of their citizenship rights,� Lieberman said Tuesday.

Such a law would potentially cover terror suspect Faisal Shahzad, a Pakistani-born American citizen charged in connection with the attempted car bombing in New York City�s Times Square. He was apprehended Monday night at the city�s John F. Kennedy airport after he boarded a flight to Dubai.

�If you have joined an enemy of the United States in attacking the United States and trying to kill Americans, I think you sacrifice your rights of citizenship,� Lieberman said.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36741.html#ixzz0nHdjNEH2

Well hot damn. Is Rham dancing his way to El Al and catching the next flight to Tel Aviv?

Quote:
There is one exception to the existing law: Americans are allowed to serve in the Israel Defense Forces without losing their citizenship.


Not Canada or the UK? Korea? Lots of Korean Americans serve in the ROK. Only Israel? Japan? Why only Israel? Joe? Why?

Ok, anyways. Either you are a citizen or you are not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thecount



Joined: 10 Nov 2009

PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Not Canada or the UK? Korea? Lots of Korean Americans serve in the ROK. Only Israel? Japan? Why only Israel? Joe? Why?


The difference is that, while Americans can and will be deployed to aid Canada or the UK, specifically joining Israel in wartime is something the United States has been (and will continue to be, if Obama's policies are any indiciation) extremely reticent to do. Just look at Israel's short history of armed conflict to see that the US will, in all likelihood, not come rushing to it's aid with reinforcements any time soon.

This is partly because we do not like to enforce the "Great Satan" rhetoric (as if our inaction will somehow mollify those who have expressed the desire to eradicate us), and partly because we have now grown dependent on "international consensus" and "diplomatic relations" and "strong foreign ties" and "unilateral sanctions" - all things that are strong when supplemental, but crippling to our country when they are the mainstays of foreign policy.

It is much more politically and diplomatically sound for Americans to fight / defend Israel as part of the IDF, so the U.S. subtly encourages that option for Israeli supporters.

At least, that's how I see it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mistermasan



Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Location: 10+ yrs on Dave's ESL cafe

PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yet "dual citizens" abound in the halls of US government. first thing, strip any elected official with a split loyalty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mistermasan wrote:
yet "dual citizens" abound in the halls of US government. first thing, strip any elected official with a split loyalty.


Examples?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
mistermasan wrote:
yet "dual citizens" abound in the halls of US government. first thing, strip any elected official with a split loyalty.


Examples?

Watch Missing Links. You have to watch the whole thing. It is two hours. Get some popcorn, and roll up a fatty. At least get the popcorn. You will get more examples than you could imagine. Compelling. A must watch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
And yet they are blocking a bill that would prevent anyone on the FBI's terrorist watch list from buying firearms or explosives.

Soooo taking away your citizenship w/out due process is ok, but taking away your 2nd amendment rights isn't?? What a bunch of fubars.


Also, too.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/05/us-cant-afford-to-care-for-911.html

Quote:
Ailing Sept. 11 responders don�t deserve a permanent, guaranteed program to ensure they get health care, and giving it to them could wreck the country, Republicans in Congress argued today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
�By making this a new mandatory program, you jeopardize the financial health of the United States of America,� said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.).


I just wish Republicans had thought like this when they were going around getting America into long-term wars. Hypocritical peacocks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International