View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PatrickBateman
Joined: 08 Jun 2009 Location: American Gardens Building, West 81st Street
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:27 pm Post subject: Cell phone in 1928? |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF8WF3vGUn8
This guy in the video is absurd, but just something to view if you're bored at work and feel like striking up a debate.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was just her holding her hat or covering her face. The "device" disappears during the fade though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickBateman
Joined: 08 Jun 2009 Location: American Gardens Building, West 81st Street
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not saying it was a cell phone, but it looked like he/she was talking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AsiaESLbound
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Location: Truck Stop Missouri
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Walkie Talkies weren't invented until the 1940's, but were large devices in a backpack the military used. She could had been listening to a radio talk show during her walk, but portable radios wouldn't had been that small back then, because this is well before transistor radios came about in the 1950's. Radios were large boxes full of glass light bulb looking tubes instead of transistors you would only use at home. I dunno what she was talking into in 1928. It's an interesting question if this really was filmed in 1928. There simply wouldn't had been any portable hand held electronic devices in 1928.
Maybe it's a rectangle shaped compact makeup case where she's looking at her face in a small mirror or she is hiding her face by holding something up? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AsiaESLbound wrote: |
Maybe it's a rectangle shaped compact makeup case where she's looking at her face in a small mirror or she is hiding her face by holding something up? |
Yeah. Something like a mirror, make-up case, cigarette case.......it could be a lot of things.....but this guy thinks because she's holding it in this position and talking it must be a mobile phone!!
Lots of old ladies walk around talking to themselves......
This guy's an idiot......I'm embarrassed he's from my hometown.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tanklor1
Joined: 13 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
She was most likely talking to the man in front of her. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
lets entertain the idea that it IS a time traveler. why would she be talking on a mobile phone? and i would imagine, if you're a time traveler in 1928, you wouldn't be openly talking into a communicating device in public like that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
murmanjake

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
machoman wrote: |
lets entertain the idea that it IS a time traveler. why would she be talking on a mobile phone? and i would imagine, if you're a time traveler in 1928, you wouldn't be openly talking into a communicating device in public like that. |
And who exactly would she be talking to?
And why is she so portly? In the future wouldn't time travelers be strictly screened for physical fitness?
And why haven't we been swallowed into a time paradox? Are we in a parallel dimension right now? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe it was a time traveler who was stranded in the early 1900's and after a certain time started to go crazy and just didn't care anymore. then he dressed in drag talking on his cell phone all day long. but the thing is, the cell phone was out of batteries because he couldn't charge it anywhere.
speaking of time traveling, did you know in the 80's, MIT held a conference inviting any time travelers. their hope was that if time traveling did exist, one of them might come forward if there was a conference held for them. no one showed up though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pangaea

Joined: 20 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. It really does look like the person is talking on a cell phone. I would have to see the original footage before I made a decision on it, though. It could be some kind of hoax. Also, if this was shot in 1928, why hasn't anyone else noticed it before? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
it could be that she didn't want to be on film and tried to cover her face, and she was probably talking to her husband in front of her. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pangaea

Joined: 20 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
True. She could be holding a small wallet or compact. Though he did make an interesting point. Quite a large woman. Did you see the size of her feet? Could very well have been a man in drag. All the more interesting since it was 1928. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machinoman
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
the answer is either time travelers, mole people, an old lady who doesn't want to be on video, or aliens. my money is on mole people. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
machinoman wrote: |
the answer is either time travelers, mole people, an old lady who doesn't want to be on video, or aliens. my money is on mole people. |
are you my long lost brother? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it is a time traveller in drag, then it probably isn't a mobile but an electric razor. Most time travellers use blue tooth anyway. Also, to avoid a paradox, if anyone does find themselves travelling back in time to the set of a Charlie Chaplin movie they will have no choice but to dress in drag and pretend to talk on their mobile. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|