Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Cell phone in 1928?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PatrickBateman



Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Location: American Gardens Building, West 81st Street

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:27 pm    Post subject: Cell phone in 1928? Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF8WF3vGUn8


This guy in the video is absurd, but just something to view if you're bored at work and feel like striking up a debate. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RMNC



Joined: 21 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought it was just her holding her hat or covering her face. The "device" disappears during the fade though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PatrickBateman



Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Location: American Gardens Building, West 81st Street

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not saying it was a cell phone, but it looked like he/she was talking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AsiaESLbound



Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Location: Truck Stop Missouri

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Walkie Talkies weren't invented until the 1940's, but were large devices in a backpack the military used. She could had been listening to a radio talk show during her walk, but portable radios wouldn't had been that small back then, because this is well before transistor radios came about in the 1950's. Radios were large boxes full of glass light bulb looking tubes instead of transistors you would only use at home. I dunno what she was talking into in 1928. It's an interesting question if this really was filmed in 1928. There simply wouldn't had been any portable hand held electronic devices in 1928.

Maybe it's a rectangle shaped compact makeup case where she's looking at her face in a small mirror or she is hiding her face by holding something up?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eamo



Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AsiaESLbound wrote:


Maybe it's a rectangle shaped compact makeup case where she's looking at her face in a small mirror or she is hiding her face by holding something up?


Yeah. Something like a mirror, make-up case, cigarette case.......it could be a lot of things.....but this guy thinks because she's holding it in this position and talking it must be a mobile phone!!

Lots of old ladies walk around talking to themselves......


This guy's an idiot......I'm embarrassed he's from my hometown..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tanklor1



Joined: 13 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

She was most likely talking to the man in front of her.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
machoman



Joined: 11 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lets entertain the idea that it IS a time traveler. why would she be talking on a mobile phone? and i would imagine, if you're a time traveler in 1928, you wouldn't be openly talking into a communicating device in public like that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
murmanjake



Joined: 21 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

machoman wrote:
lets entertain the idea that it IS a time traveler. why would she be talking on a mobile phone? and i would imagine, if you're a time traveler in 1928, you wouldn't be openly talking into a communicating device in public like that.


And who exactly would she be talking to?

And why is she so portly? In the future wouldn't time travelers be strictly screened for physical fitness?

And why haven't we been swallowed into a time paradox? Are we in a parallel dimension right now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
machoman



Joined: 11 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe it was a time traveler who was stranded in the early 1900's and after a certain time started to go crazy and just didn't care anymore. then he dressed in drag talking on his cell phone all day long. but the thing is, the cell phone was out of batteries because he couldn't charge it anywhere.

speaking of time traveling, did you know in the 80's, MIT held a conference inviting any time travelers. their hope was that if time traveling did exist, one of them might come forward if there was a conference held for them. no one showed up though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pangaea



Joined: 20 Dec 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. It really does look like the person is talking on a cell phone. I would have to see the original footage before I made a decision on it, though. It could be some kind of hoax. Also, if this was shot in 1928, why hasn't anyone else noticed it before?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
machoman



Joined: 11 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it could be that she didn't want to be on film and tried to cover her face, and she was probably talking to her husband in front of her.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pangaea



Joined: 20 Dec 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

True. She could be holding a small wallet or compact. Though he did make an interesting point. Quite a large woman. Did you see the size of her feet? Could very well have been a man in drag. All the more interesting since it was 1928.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
machinoman



Joined: 12 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the answer is either time travelers, mole people, an old lady who doesn't want to be on video, or aliens. my money is on mole people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
machoman



Joined: 11 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

machinoman wrote:
the answer is either time travelers, mole people, an old lady who doesn't want to be on video, or aliens. my money is on mole people.


are you my long lost brother?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ED209



Joined: 17 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it is a time traveller in drag, then it probably isn't a mobile but an electric razor. Most time travellers use blue tooth anyway. Also, to avoid a paradox, if anyone does find themselves travelling back in time to the set of a Charlie Chaplin movie they will have no choice but to dress in drag and pretend to talk on their mobile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International