Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

a multiple choice Grammar Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:36 pm    Post subject: a multiple choice Grammar Question Reply with quote

I've got a multiple choice question that I need some help with because I'm not confident on the answer - or why.

Choose the sentence that has the same meaning as
"Cathy seems to have been hurt."

(1) It seemed that Cathy had been hurt.
(2) It seemed that Cathy was hurt.
(3) It seems that Cathy was hurt.
(4) It seemed that Cathy is hurt.
(5) It seems that Cathy is hurt.

Am I the only one confused by all of that?

Thanks for any input.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lifeinkorea



Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Location: somewhere in China

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Have been", present perfect, is used for describing things that recently happened. I have typed this sentence. Now I am typing this sentence. I typed the first sentence earlier.

So, which answer shows something that finished recently?

1) past, no
2) past, no
3) present observation about a past event, could mean she is not hurt now (50% correct), so no
4) past with present, no (grammar conflict, worst answer available)
5) present observation about something that happened recently, BINGO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
thegadfly



Joined: 01 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1 to lifeinkorea...though I am curious what test that question comes from....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jizza



Joined: 24 Aug 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think both 3 and 5 are acceptable. The rule isn't totally strict in that it means one or the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
machoman



Joined: 11 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jizza wrote:
I think both 3 and 5 are acceptable. The rule isn't totally strict in that it means one or the other.


agreed. instinctively, i chose 3 first, but lifeinkorea's breakdown of it makes sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Riker



Joined: 28 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I need to work on my grammar. They all seemed correct to me. I have a grammar book that I will start working on tonight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reise-ohne-Ende



Joined: 07 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think they're all correct grammatically, but I agree with lifeinkorea's explanation even though my initial feeling was #3. It's rare that someone changes my mind on a language/grammar issue...so...kudos! Very Happy

PS - these tests are ridiculous. I have no doubt that their are Koreans who would get the right answer on this question and be able to explain exactly why...using Korean...but who could not have a comfortable and mostly error-free everyday conversation. -_-;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
different



Joined: 22 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Out of context, I guess 5 is the best answer, but it's really tricky because in 5 "hurt" is an adjective, not a verb. If pressed for time, I would've chosen 3. In some contexts 3 would be correct and 5 would be wrong.

Example: "My neighbor's cat, Cathy, likes to fight. For the past couple of years she has been missing a chunk of her ear. Cathy seems to have been hurt. Maybe that big cat up the street bit a piece of her ear off."

In this example, choice 3 is better: It seems that Cathy was hurt.
5 doesn't work, since the injury has surely healed by now: It seems that Cathy is hurt.

Out of context, I guess 5 is the closest answer, but it's debatable, and therefore this question is not a good test question. It's hard to make a perfect test, because there are often different ways to interpret test questions.

Riker wrote:
Wow, I need to work on my grammar. They all seemed correct to me. I have a grammar book that I will start working on tonight.

If you're a new teacher, it would be better to spend time reading a book like "How Languages Are Learned", by Nina Spada. Don't aspire to teach students to answer grammar IQ questions. It will not help them be able to use English. The writer of this test question may well be a Korean public school teacher who can't hold a basic conversation in English.


Last edited by different on Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:52 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoholDiver



Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think 3 and 5 are both acceptable. Hurt can mean injured as the occurance at the time, and also a continued state of being hurt. The original sentence does not give us enough information to make that judgment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edwardcatflap



Joined: 22 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

quote]I think they're all correct grammatically[/quote]

How can 4 possibly be correct? On first impressions LifeinKorea�s explanatiuon seems to be the closest though there are still a few issues. I would question his reasoning on the present perfect. The present perfect aspect can show something that has happened recently when used with adverbs such as 'just' and 'recently' but simple past can also be used to describe something that happened recently - e.g. 'I saw him five seconds ago'. The use of present perfect without an adverb e.g. 'I have hurt myself' suggests not necessarily something that happened recently but something that has its result in the present. ie 'I am still hurt now'. Usually something with a present result was completed recently but not always. Look at this example. I've been decorating my house for the last five years. I've painted the dining room and living room but haven't done the kitchen yet.
I agree with Different about possible different meanings of hurt, however I�m not sure I buy the cat example. If a cat had been missing a piece of its ear for two years you would not use the present perfect to talk about it unless you were noticing it for the first time. You would probably say this

"My neighbor's cat, Cathy, likes to fight. For the past couple of years she has been missing a chunk of her ear. She was/got hurt. Maybe that big cat up the street bit a piece of her ear off."

There are, however, other possible meanings of hurt. In the context of emotionally scarred for example, �"Cathy seems to have been hurt." would be a comment on an action that could have happened years ago. Ie �Cathy seems to have been hurt, she takes a long time to trust men completely. In that case number three would be closer to the meaning. So I suppose I agree with Different that�s it�s a poor question, with Boholdiver that 3 and 5 are both possible and with Lifeinkorea that the intended correct answer was probably 5.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bobbybigfoot



Joined: 05 May 2007
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The answer is 5.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
different



Joined: 22 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I looked at it again. It's 3 or 5. They're both fine and overlap in meaning with the original sentence. Without thinking about it like a math problem, 3 feels more similar and fits better intuitively, to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International