View previous topic :: View next topic |
48�2(9+3)=? |
2 |
|
57% |
[ 16 ] |
288 |
|
42% |
[ 12 ] |
|
Total Votes : 28 |
|
Author |
Message |
ForceOne

Joined: 25 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:02 pm Post subject: What does... |
|
|
48�2(9+3)=???
2 or 288?
Discuss |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itistime
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2, silly.
Why is 6 afraid of 7?
Because 7 - 8 - 9.
Now go outside and get some sun
on that pasty body of yours. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
288
My proof? I passed grade 9 math. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Draz

Joined: 27 Jun 2007 Location: Land of Morning Clam
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2
Because if you write it like a normal equation that is the answer.
48
2(9+3)
Saving this for posterity:
RMNC wrote: |
288
My proof? I passed grade 9 math. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fadedgirl
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the order of operations was PEMDAS,
parentheses
exponents
multiplication
division
addition and finally
subtraction |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Peabody
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 Location: here
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Draz wrote: |
2
Because if you write it like a normal equation that is the answer.
48
2(9+3)
Saving this for posterity:
RMNC wrote: |
288
My proof? I passed grade 9 math. |
|
Answer
48
__ * (9+3) = 288
2
It's not 48/(2(9+3)) = 2
You are adding brackets that don't exist.
Either way, the equation is poorly written. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Google knows all
http://tinyurl.com/MATH-HOMIE
Y'all just got mathowned
Saving this for posterity posterity
Draz wrote: |
2
Because if you write it like a normal equation that is the answer.
48
2(9+3)
Saving this for posterity:
RMNC wrote: |
288
My proof? I passed grade 9 math. |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Peabody
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 Location: here
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
RMNC wrote: |
Google knows all
http://tinyurl.com/MATH-HOMIE
Y'all just got mathowned
Saving this for posterity posterity
Draz wrote: |
2
Because if you write it like a normal equation that is the answer.
48
2(9+3)
Saving this for posterity:
RMNC wrote: |
288
My proof? I passed grade 9 math. |
|
|
y'all? mathowned?
better brush up on your linking skills... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MyNameIsNobody
Joined: 12 Jan 2011 Location: Here
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:05 am Post subject: What does... |
|
|
48�2(9+3)=288
...because:
48 � 2 (9 + 3) = 48 � 2 x (9+3) = 48 � 2 x (12) = 24 x (12) = 288
I could have dropped the parentheses once I added 9 and 3, because with the multiplication symbol, they are redundant. In order for 2 to be the solution, the formula would have to be written with additional parentheses:
48 � (2 (9 + 3)) = 48 � (2 x (9 + 3)) = 48 � (2 x (12)) = 48 � (24) = 2
So, RMNC and Google are right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Peabody wrote: |
y'all? mathowned?
better brush up on your linking skills... |
Did you even click the link? You are aware that tinyurl makes long URLs smaller, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Peabody
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 Location: here
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
RMNC wrote: |
Mr. Peabody wrote: |
y'all? mathowned?
better brush up on your linking skills... |
Did you even click the link? You are aware that tinyurl makes long URLs smaller, right? |
http://tinyurl.com/MATH-HOMIE
Yes, I clicked on the link. Google Korea. So what? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cyui
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this an indifferental equation? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Peabody
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 Location: here
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Peabody wrote: |
Answer
48
__ * (9+3) = 288
2
It's not 48/(2(9+3)) = 2
You are adding brackets that don't exist.Either way, the equation is poorly written. |
MyNamwIsNobody wrote: |
In order for 2 to be the solution, the formula would have to be written with additional parentheses: |
duh...that's what I said...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
silkhighway
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not to get too serious in this thread, but I read a math blog that was comparing elementary math textbooks today from ones in the early 21st century. At the time, kids spent a ton of energy solving variations of this math "problem" , which was a complete waste of time. If you really want computer-grade accuracy, then use Polish Notation, otherwise context is important.
So my vote? Both. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Peabody wrote: |
RMNC wrote: |
Mr. Peabody wrote: |
y'all? mathowned?
better brush up on your linking skills... |
Did you even click the link? You are aware that tinyurl makes long URLs smaller, right? |
http://tinyurl.com/MATH-HOMIE
Yes, I clicked on the link. Google Korea. So what? |
Something must be wrong on your end. That link for me goes to google.com's calculator, with the equation and answer as 288. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|