Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

grammar question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mellow-d



Joined: 07 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:43 pm    Post subject: grammar question Reply with quote

Yep, it's that time of year again.

Are the following sentences correct?

a. For us, the object was too heavy to lift.
b. The object was too heavy to lift for us.
c. The object was too heavy for us to lift.
d. The object, for us, was too heavy to lift.

I know that "c" would be the most natural to say. But, do you think the other answers are also correct?

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edwardcatflap



Joined: 22 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say they were all correct. It depends on what emphasis you want to convey. E.g.

For you the object was light but 'for us, the object was too heavy to lift.

A: Was the object light enoygh to lift?
B: No, the object was too heavy to lift. For us.

A: Was the person light?
B: Yes the person was light enough to lift but the object, for us, was too heavy to lift.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mellow-d



Joined: 07 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think it is absolutely necessary to have the commas for those above sentences? If they were omitted, would the sentences be incorrect?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mellow-d wrote:
Do you think it is absolutely necessary to have the commas for those above sentences? If they were omitted, would the sentences be incorrect?


absolutely necessary? good question.
I hesitate to say absolutely necessary, but certainly prescriptively correct to use them.
in a) not absolutely necessary...but intro tags are often set off with a comma.(highly recommended)
in d) highly recommended...in order to separate the verbal element from the direct object.( the meaning of object - concrete v.s. abstract idea - goal)
i.e. The object for us was to answer the questions correctly. - not necessary in this construction...optional upon stress and context.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International