View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kepler
Joined: 24 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 8:06 pm Post subject: Why Language Classes Don't Work According to Timothy Ferriss |
|
|
Timothy Ferriss, a former curriculum designer at Berlitz International who has achieved fluency in six foreign languages himself, explains why most languages classes don't work:
"1. Teachers are viewed as saviors when materials are actually the determining factor. Teachers are merely conduits for the material. By analogy, it is better to have a decent cook with excellent easy-to-follow recipe than a great cook with terrible recipe. It is the material that will restrict or elevate the teacher, and a good teacher forced to follow bad material will hinder, not hasten, learning progress...."
This is a very valid point that many schools fail to understand. A lot of schools seem much more concerned about the teachers they hire than the quality of their language learning materials. It's not going to make a big difference if McDonald's hires an experienced chef to flip burgers.
"2. Classes move as slowly as the slowest student...."
Obviously true...
"3. Conversation can be learned but not taught.... Grammar can be learned with writing exercises in a class of 20, whereas 'conversation' cannot be learned in anything but a realistic one-on-one environment where your brain is forced to adapt to normal speed and adopt coping mechanisms such as delaying tactics ('in other words,' 'let me think for a second,' etc.). Separate grammar from conversation practice...."
A person can spend years studying a foreign language in a classroom but then experience great difficulty in having a five minute conversation with a native speaker in a real life situation.
"4. Teachers are often prescriptive instead of descriptive...."
Sometimes the language in foreign language study books is much more formal and polite than the language used by native speakers in most situations.
http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/bonus/pdf/why-classes-dont-work.pdf |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Triban

Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Location: Suwon Station
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
5. Students don't study outside of class. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Slowmotion
Joined: 15 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well one thing that doesn't work is when the Korean teachers pronounce the words like it is spelled in Korean rather than English. Then when students hear the real pronunciation, they have no idea what word it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ESL Milk "Everyday
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He makes a lot of good points... and I think a lot of the teachers here should be taking this to heart-- if only more of us cared about what we were doing.
I'm not so sure about the one-on-one thing, however... I often try to talk to my students as a whole class... admittedly, I'm not always reaching everyone, but I do see lights in some of their eyes from time to time. Obviously one-on-one is more intensive, but I'm not completely willing to rule out group discussion 100%... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sigmundsmith
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 11:50 pm Post subject: Re: Why Language Classes Don't Work According to Timothy Fer |
|
|
Kepler wrote: |
"1. ...
A lot of schools seem much more concerned about the teachers they hire than the quality of their language learning materials. It's not going to make a big difference if McDonald's hires an experienced chef to flip burgers.
|
In some ways what is said is true but in others (especially about Korea and this statement) can be said to be further from the truth.
Koreans don't know what a good language teacher is (blonde hair and blue eyed, and young is what they think).
Yes, material is important and what is chosen to be used is. Most language classes use generic material that students don't relate to. However, a good language teacher may use the concept of a lesson from the curriculum and manipulate it enough to make it more worthwhile.
There are so many factors why someone is successful at developing EFL skills and some aren't. The analogy of food is a good one though. If two people walk into McDonalds and order a burger and both burgers are below par in quality, one will dismiss the burger and not eat it while the other is so hungry that they will eat it anyway. So, it doesn't really give a clear and definitive answer as to what will constitute success for an EFL learner.
Like I said, he has good points and other points that can be question. Also, the chap is Curriculum Developer so he has a vested interest in the position of quality curriculum. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TECO

Joined: 20 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
He's put some thought into those comments. They're important to consider for EFL instructors. It's easy to get tied to the materials and let the text control the direction of the lesson; when in fact, the instructor needs to be in control of the lesson. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DIsbell
Joined: 15 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tim Ferris, in my opinion, has to be taken with a grain of salt. I really like a lot of his blog articles and ideas about language learning, but mainly for their usefulness in pursuing self study (and I like his travel stuff). However he tends to make a lot of generalizations about mainstream/formal language learning (which have some basis in reality for sure) that don't actually contrast with what are actually prevalent ideas in the fields of TESL and SLA. Anyone who has taken any sort of TESL course, for example, would know that language classes aren't supposed to be nothing but teachers talking and students passively listening, but that's what Ferriss tends to characterize classroom language learning as.
The reason you need to take him with a grain of salt is that he's first and foremost an entrepreneur whose main racket at the moment is selling self-help books. So of course his wunderkind stories about learning 6 languages "easily" and achieving fluency in a short time sound appealing- if it didn't sound appealing, he wouldn't sell books.
Last edited by DIsbell on Mon May 02, 2011 3:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldtrafford
Joined: 12 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't agree more!!
The reason you need to take him with a grain of salt is that he's first and foremost an entrepreneur whose main racket at the moment is selling self-help books. So of course his wunderkind stories about learning 6 languages "easily" and achieving fluency in a short time sound appealing- if it didn't sound appealing, he wouldn't sell books. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Surprise, surprise. Human nature wants results without effort.
In other news, the sky is blue and I'm better looking than Triban. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
As someone else pointed out, he's a curriculum designer so of course he thinks that's the most important thing. Also from what I've heard Berlitz is the kind of place that forces teachers to stick rigidly to their methodology and book so that's another reason. In a school where teachers are made to stick to some script at every point then of course the quality of the teacher will be less important. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TECO

Joined: 20 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
DIsbell wrote: |
Tim Ferris, in my opinion, has to be taken with a grain of salt. I really like a lot of his blog articles and ideas about language learning, but mainly for their usefulness in pursuing self study (and I like his travel stuff). However he tends to make a lot of generalizations about mainstream/formal language learning (which have some basis in reality for sure) that don't actually contrast with what are actually prevalent ideas in the fields of TESL and SLA. Anyone who has taken any sort of TESL course, for example, would know that language classes aren't supposed to be nothing but teachers talking and students passively listening, but that's what Ferriss tends to characterize classroom language learning as.
The reason you need to take him with a grain of salt is that he's first and foremost an entrepreneur whose main racket at the moment is selling self-help books. So of course his wunderkind stories about learning 6 languages "easily" and achieving fluency in a short time sound appealing- if it didn't sound appealing, he wouldn't sell books. |
All good points to remember. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
DIsbell wrote:
Tim Ferris, in my opinion, has to be taken with a grain of salt. I really like a lot of his blog articles and ideas about language learning, but mainly for their usefulness in pursuing self study (and I like his travel stuff). However he tends to make a lot of generalizations about mainstream/formal language learning (which have some basis in reality for sure) that don't actually contrast with what are actually prevalent ideas in the fields of TESL and SLA. Anyone who has taken any sort of TESL course, for example, would know that language classes aren't supposed to be nothing but teachers talking and students passively listening, but that's what Ferriss tends to characterize classroom language learning as.
The reason you need to take him with a grain of salt is that he's first and foremost an entrepreneur whose main racket at the moment is selling self-help books. So of course his wunderkind stories about learning 6 languages "easily" and achieving fluency in a short time sound appealing- if it didn't sound appealing, he wouldn't sell books.
All good points to remember. |
Good comments.
I read the article and can only say that I agree with many of the comments "in a very general vein". Teaching does make a difference but teachers now that students do have access to quality content and even native speaker input (through video/skype/ websites like what I'm working on - EnglishCentral), teachers have to take on a new role.
I just put up a video on EFL 2.0. Find it on youtube. Not specifically about ELT but really shows clearly the new direction of what a teacher should be. (at the end).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwM4ieFOotA
DD
http://eflclassroom.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
walter235
Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Location: korea
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember reading sometime back a teacher posted an article from the mid-1960's about teaching in Korea. The complaints and observations were just like the ones teachers make about teaching English here today. Do you expect much to change in an old, hidebound, mediocre country like Korea? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chet Wautlands

Joined: 11 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter235 wrote: |
I remember reading sometime back a teacher posted an article from the mid-1960's about teaching in Korea. The complaints and observations were just like the ones teachers make about teaching English here today. Do you expect much to change in an old, hidebound, mediocre country like Korea? |
I get the impression that you love Korea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
walter235
Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Location: korea
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chet Wautlands wrote: |
walter235 wrote: |
I remember reading sometime back a teacher posted an article from the mid-1960's about teaching in Korea. The complaints and observations were just like the ones teachers make about teaching English here today. Do you expect much to change in an old, hidebound, mediocre country like Korea? |
I get the impression that you love Korea. |
Let's just say I'm looking forward to the end of my contract............. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|