|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
catman

Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:47 pm Post subject: Carter held 'confrontational' talks in N. Korea |
|
|
| Quote: |
Former US President Jimmy Carter has described his meeting last week with a top North Korean official as "negative and confrontational" and marked by condemnation of past US policy.
Carter, who visited the communist state with three other ex-leaders, also criticised the North's military-first priorities in a report on the visit.
The ex-leaders, from a group called The Elders, intended to ease heightened tensions between the two Koreas, assess food shortages and encourage nuclear disarmament.
Carter, in a report posted on the Carter Center website, said they also hoped to persuade the North to work with the United Nations on human rights and to free an American detained since last November.
The North says it will charge Eddie Jun Yong-Su with unspecified crimes against the nation. Carter confirmed earlier reports that Jun, a tractor salesman, also acts as a missionary.
Carter said a meeting with nominal head of state Kim Yong-Nam was "surprisingly negative and confrontational, filled with his condemnation of historical US policy toward North Korea".
The ex-president said he finally interrupted to point out that Kim "was concentrating exclusively on a negative and distorted picture of the past while we had come to look to the future with hopes of reconciling differences".
But the meeting ended with no easing of tensions and Kim said Jun would not be released.
The group failed to meet leader Kim Jong-Il. But they said they received a personal message from him that offered unconditional talks with the United States and South Korea including a summit with Seoul's leader.
Foreign Minister Pak Ui-Chun described the North's "great need" for food aid and peace and stressed commitment to past denuclearisation accords, Carter wrote.
"He made it plain, however, that NK would have to retain nuclear weapons as long as they are threatened by an antagonistic US with nuclear weapons."
Carter was criticised by South Korean media for his perceived pro-Pyongyang bias. But in his report he questioned the North's priorities after visiting a large hospital with no running water except in the operating room area.
"We saw no reason why a government that can develop advanced weapons cannot provide water for their hospitals," he wrote.
The Elders after their trip described the North's food shortages as a crisis. Carter accused the US and South Korea of a "human rights violation" for, in his view, withholding food aid from the North for political reasons.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
comm
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's nice to see that Carter's group is only 95% in the Norks' camp. It's obviously pretty ironic that it's a "human rights violation" to force North Korea to be self-sufficient, but apparently not a "human rights violation" to pursue massive military and weapons programs instead of sustaining your country's own population.
I think a lot of this insanity comes from a massive sense of cultural superiority, masked by heartfelt desire to improve people's lives. If a Western nation took steps toward being like North Korea, it would obviously entail horrific human rights violations and Carter wouldn't stand for it. It's clear that people like Carter think that North Korea's leadership doesn't know better. They think that some day they will realize that the West's way is the way that civilized people behave and we'll just have to set a good example until they realize it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|