|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bootsanator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:53 pm Post subject: Return Airfare Question |
|
|
Hi ESLCafe users,
I just finished up my first year contract at a hagwon on 10/28. They signed a release letter for me, my next job will be starting in December.
I had considered going home during November, but am 99% sure I will not.
Here is my problem - because I will likely not leave, my hagwon refuses to pay my return airfare. I believe I am owed the airfare, because of the wording of the contract, as follows.
Quote: |
5. AIRFARE TO KOREA:
The employee's one-way economy class or regular class airfare to Korea will be paid by the school. Return airfare to the employee's home country shall be paid by the school upon completion of the 12 month contractual teaching period. Return airfare will not be provided if the employee leaves the school prior to completion of the 12 month teaching period. If the employee terminates the contract for any reason within 6 months, the employee is responsible for reimbursing the school for the cost of the plane ticket to Korea.
|
Important part in Bold. This is the entire "Airfare" section of my contract. The airfare to the country initially was reimbursed a couple of days after my arrival, it's the return ticket part that is the problem.
As you can see, it says simply that upon completing my contract, they will provide me return airfare to my home country after I finish my 12 months. I've finished my 12 months, they owe me airfare to the US. Not to my home town, but the cheapest ticket they can find. Obviously I would prefer to my hometown, but since right now they don't even want to pay me at all, I'll take what I can get.
Their justification, in addition to the fact that I will not be flying home right now, is that they say the airfare is an "expense" and not salary, or some such garbage that makes no difference as far as the wording of the contract goes.
(I do plan on going home at some point, which is another major reason I want what I am owed).
Can someone who knows things about contracts and the laws here give me advice on what to do? Who has precedence here, the school or me? Does it make any difference at all whether I intend to go home or not? That sounds like semantics the school is making up to suit their interests.
This is not a chain school, but a one-building hagwon. If you think more information would help you to know what advice to give, please ask and I will post more.
Thanks for the help,
-Boots |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itistime
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I�m assuming you screwed up by making your intentions known. Did you tell them that you probably won�t go home right now? Never tell Koreans anything�especially co workers/employers. Make some elaborate sh l + up if you have to.
Don�t tell �em what you eat for breakfast, what you did over the weekend, who you�re hanging out with, where you plan on going for vacation, etc. It�s either going to bite you in the ass or give them something to talk about. They�re sometimes curious about the foreigner and often curious on how to use information against you. Sounds like the latter, in this case. I think you�re screwed, but now you know for next time.
You can spend lots of time fighting it...maybe you'll squeeze some dough out of them. Good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
koreatimes
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
They signed a release letter for me, my next job will be starting in December. |
Airfare is for you to come to Korea, and then again back home. If you honestly did that, then you wouldn't get the money. If you went home and the hagwon owner didn't want to pay, then he would be holding back money owed to you. That is the reason for the bold part in the contract you are looking at.
However, if you are staying in the country then it is you that is being greedy by trying to cash in on something which was never intended to reach you unless it was for reimbursement. Since no one should leave the country without this reimbursement, it doesn't need to be reimbursement, and therefore you never need to see this money. The intent is for a flight, not for you. Bus fare is intended for taking a bus. Train fare is intended for taking a train.
In addition to all of this, the hagwon is giving you a release letter. This is a legitimate exchange in my opinion. You save the trouble of having to get new documents and waiting 12 weeks, which would put you into February 2012. The hagwon is saving you time and money with a release letter. You are saving them airfare.
Considering that you don't want to work until December, I find this rather selfish to go beyond all this and expect them to give you airfare you obviously don't need for the purposes of returning home after your 1 year obligations are finished.
The only thing I can think of that would merit more money from the first hagwon is if they had you work an extra month. Make sure they have contributed into pension, paid severance, and given any necessary security deposits back. Then, say, "Thank you" for the release letter and move on. You are rather lucky to have a job to transition to during the coldest part of the year.
Quote: |
The airfare to the country initially was reimbursed a couple of days after my arrival |
A lot of schools wait for the end of the month or say you have to wait till the 10th of the next month (40 days). Looks like you had a good hagwon job. They paid for your airfare 2 days after arrival.
If you re-sign, then they sometimes pay you for a trip home and back. You aren't re-signing.
Last edited by koreatimes on Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OP - Unfortunately, your contract does not have a clause that states they will give you a cash equivalent for a ticket.
So do you want them to buy you a ticket that you don't plan on using? What is the point of that?
Most tickets are non-refundable, so you couldn't cash in on it. Even if it is a refundable ticket, you'll need to buy it first and have them reimburse you, then cancel it. Because the airline will only reimburse the purchaser not the person named on the ticket. And the refundable tickets usually cost an outrageous price compared to the non-refundable from your typical travel website. So good luck getting them to foot the bill for a ticket that costs twice as much than the usual fare.
Your contract clearly states that they should provide you with a return ticket, not cash in lieu of.
So technically, they should buy you a ticket regardless if you fly or not. But since it is clear you aren't getting the cash for the ticket and aren't flying home, why have them buy the ticket?
Honestly, your school sounds like it's on the up and up. They gave you a letter of release and possibly a recommendation letter. (Unless they didn't pay your insurance, pension, etc...)
I'd just walk away, take your final pay and severance and a good recommendation letter. Many recruiters and schools are calling old schools for references now. I'd say almost all of them. A good reference might be worth more than the plane ticket in the future if you plan to stick it out here for a while. And who knows, maybe your new job doesn't work out and you might need that reference sooner than you anticipate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bootsanator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had considered going home for a a couple of weeks in November, but with them flat out denying me the plane ticket due to the release letter, that became impossible.
The way vacations line up for my next job, if I wasn't able to go home in November I was hoping to use the money to go home for a couple of weeks during the next vacation time, but now I might have to put off a home trip for quite a while.
As for the release letter, the only cost there was a couple minutes of someone's time and an ink stamp, not exactly a trade for a plane ticket that I was expecting. I realize that I'm lucky to have such a smooth transition at this time of year (as long as the visa business goes through this week). I don't see it as a "fair exchange" though.
If I truly thought I was just being a greedy jerk, I wouldn't have made this post, as then I would be called a greedy jerk and ignored. I don't think I'm being a horrible person asking for this, I think it's a legitimate claim, but I have no experience with what hagwons typically do, or Korean law in this situation, hence my question. I was trying to go by the letter of the contract.
Although, the contract also said I was supposed to get Air Conditioning in my apartment, but I sweltered all summer instead. I saved them an aircon unit, how about I get comped for that I suppose that's a joke, but only half a joke, it was hot, humid, and not fun.
Hmm, to get into specifics, a round trip ticket to my hometown would cost about $1300 if I bought it soon, $1000 if I bought it way in advance. What I would hope the school would pay me if I'm not certain of my return flight would be the minimum possible amount, aka: "return airfare to the employee's home country" which would be, what, $700 to SFO? Maybe even $650 or lower if a person searched far enough into the future on the right dates.
All of these amounts were found through searching kayak.com for a few minutes, not the most thorough of searches.
Anyway, more opinions/ideas? Thanks, ESL people  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, you didn't make it clear that they were providing either a release letter or the airfare.
To me, those are two different things, exclusive of one another. So you shouldn't get one or the other.
Employers are not required to give you a LOR. They can if they want. Your school wanted to, but it should not then mean you don't get airfare too.
If you want to fly home, you should get the airfare. (Especially because of the month time between contracts)
If you aren't flying home, you shouldn't.
End of story.
Is the new school giving you incoming airfare or cash equivalent? What is the new school's rule on return airfare too? You might want to get that sorted out before you complete your second contract. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
koreatimes
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
not exactly a trade for a plane ticket that I was expecting |
Why does it matter to you? You aren't the airline industry. They are the ones losing out on money for you to go back home and money your second school would pay to fly you back.
You still seem to think this ink on paper is worth less than what you are owed. YOU ARE OWED LESS THAN WHAT THE INK ON PAPER COSTS.
Quote: |
I was trying to go by the letter of the contract. |
So have them pay for a flight and don't go on it. Waste the hagwon's money. That is what happens when we do things by the letter of the contract, eye for an eye, pound of flesh. I for one am not Shylock.
The savings means YOU don't have to pay for 3 months in your home country while you get your documents lined up for a new school. Right now it's a WIN WIN WIN situation.
Quote: |
If you want to fly home, you should get the airfare. |
This is more practical in terms of re-signing, not when you go to another school.
Quote: |
Is the new school giving you incoming airfare or cash equivalent? |
Same thing with leaving. Both schools are saving money from the airline industry as mentioned earlier, they are not robbing the teacher (the teacher would never see that money). If anyone should complain, it's the airline industry not the teachers.
If there is a 1 month gap between contract periods, either the first hagwon is not reporting them to immigration or the second hagwon isn't making them work. Either case, the teacher is getting a good deal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem with plane tickets, as I understand it, is that it's not a labor department issue. As such, in order to get whatever your'e owed (and in this case it sounds like they definitely should be giving you a return ticket, as you completed a year), you'll have to sue them. This is what the labor department told my friend when he had a similar concern, anyway. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this point. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanrutledge
Joined: 01 May 2008 Location: Marakesh
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see a trade there at all. If you finished the contract, a letter of release is not needed. You simply start the new job and report the change to immigration with your new employers papers.
OP, you need to see what the KOREAN version of the contract says. IF it says that you get a TICKET home, then yeah, you're out of luck. But if it says you get the money for a ticket, then you get the money for the ticket. WHEN you actually buy it is irrelevant. Personally, I had a job where I got return airfare and I moved to a job without return airfare. I took the return airfare money and put it in a CD so I would have the money when I needed it.
So, yeah, from what is written, I think you are owed the money. Standard GEPIK contracts these days state that you only get the money IF you are leaving within ten days of finishing the contract. This contract has no clause other than the standard "if you quit" clause, so why should the OP be denied that flight money? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanrutledge
Joined: 01 May 2008 Location: Marakesh
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koreatimes wrote: |
Quote: |
I was trying to go by the letter of the contract. |
So have them pay for a flight and don't go on it. Waste the hagwon's money. That is what happens when we do things by the letter of the contract, eye for an eye, pound of flesh. I for one am not Shylock.
The savings means YOU don't have to pay for 3 months in your home country while you get your documents lined up for a new school. Right now it's a WIN WIN WIN situation.
Quote: |
If you want to fly home, you should get the airfare. |
This is more practical in terms of re-signing, not when you go to another school.
Quote: |
Is the new school giving you incoming airfare or cash equivalent? |
Same thing with leaving. Both schools are saving money from the airline industry as mentioned earlier, they are not robbing the teacher (the teacher would never see that money). If anyone should complain, it's the airline industry not the teachers.
If there is a 1 month gap between contract periods, either the first hagwon is not reporting them to immigration or the second hagwon isn't making them work. Either case, the teacher is getting a good deal. |
You're way off base here.
E-2 visas are good for 13 months now, and the time on the visa isn't even what matters - the time on the ARC card is. Personally, my last ARC was good for 13.5 months because of the holidays and processing delays. So someone can sit around for up to 6 weeks between jobs and still be legal.
Second, why would anyone need to waste three months getting new documents? Anyone who has been in Korea lately knows that an FBI check is required and would have gotten it done already. Plus, once all the paperwork is in the system, as long as a person doesn't leave Korea for more than 3 months, new docs aren't required.
Finally, a job guarantees to pay a return flight. A person takes that job with that stipulation in mind. Then they renege. As I said, I took my flight money and put it into a CD to save for when I DO go home, as my new job doesn't offer flight money. So, why should the OP cede what the employer contractually agreed to? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Koreatimes- He completed his contract and wants to go home. The school is required to pay for his ticket home regardless of his intention to return to Korea or not. Unless he doesn't want to go home. Than no ticket no cash.
But if he made his arrangement to fly after completing the contract I'd say too late. Which might be the case here with the OP, except the OP said that he got either a LOR or a ticket. Which isn't fair.
And as for the new school, if his new school agreed to give him cash as a "re-settlement bonus" than he should be entitled to it. If his new school agreed to give him a plane ticket to come to Korea, he should only get it if he is not in Korea. However, if at the time he signed his new contract he was in Korea and the school was not aware of him flying home between contracts, then went home and wants the ticket after the fact, I'd say he is not entitled to it.
Nathan- All the contract promises is a ticket. No cash. He doesn't fly he doesn't get a ticket or cash.
Last edited by jrwhite82 on Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:36 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
northway wrote: |
The problem with plane tickets, as I understand it, is that it's not a labor department issue. As such, in order to get whatever your'e owed (and in this case it sounds like they definitely should be giving you a return ticket, as you completed a year), you'll have to sue them. This is what the labor department told my friend when he had a similar concern, anyway. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this point. |
I've heard the same thing. After all the frustration and lawyer it isn't worth it IMO. Especially if you aren't even intending to fly home. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
koreatimes
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I don't see a trade there at all. If you finished the contract, a letter of release is not needed. You simply start the new job and report the change to immigration with your new employers papers. |
How about the month he isn't working? Immigration office will ok this?
Quote: |
E-2 visas are good for 13 months now |
I did forget that, but it doesn't matter. Is the 13th month to allow the teacher to find another school and not work? I thought in the 13th month they would have to still work. If they got their severance it's a moot point.
Quote: |
Anyone who has been in Korea lately knows that an FBI check is required and would have gotten it done already. |
Yes, that is what I would have done if I were leaving before the 12th or as you pointed out 13th month mark. They didn't. They planned it differently. So, there you have one case of someone doing the unthinkable. I hope they got their severance and pension contributions.
Quote: |
So, why should the OP cede what the employer contractually agreed to? |
If the courts want to back that notion, then I am not against it. However, I am just saying how I do business. If you give me 20 bucks for something that only costs 15, I'll give you 5 back. I won't pocket it. It's just the way I am.
If I don't leave a country, or I leave the country on my own volition, then I don't expect the school to pay period (regardless what a contract says). However, last year, I was in China and my school wanted me to change my visa to a working visa. In that case, they had to pay transportation. I refused to get reimbursed. They paid for 2 flights, hotel expenses, and even had someone in Korea to do my visa run for me while I waited. That's how I roll.
Quote: |
Koreatimes- He completed his contract and wants to go home. |
That's fine. He can get that legally I suppose. The 1 year contract is not a crystal ball. It doesn't know if the employee will stay in the country or if the employee will leave before the year is up. After he goes home, then what? Then the second school has to pay for him to return? Did he ever state the second school would be willing to do this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanrutledge
Joined: 01 May 2008 Location: Marakesh
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can stay in the country as long as you have a valid visa. The new 13 month E2 is designed so you dont have to deal with extensions to leave the country AND to facilitate an easier transition between jobs. So, as long as the visa is good, you can end a job, sit around for some time, then start the new one - AS LONG AS YOUR NEW JOB IS WITHIN THAT VISA TIME FRAME. As the OP said he finished on the 28th and is startin in December, he might be okay. I don't know the specifics of his visa time though.
The 13th month can be used for anything - finding a new job, sitting around, packing up to leave.
As far as the FBI thing, the OP said nothing about needing a new check, so its a moot point.
I agree that you shuoldn't pocket change, but that's not the issue here either. He is contractually obligated to get return airfare. Not a ticket, but FARE - the money to buy the ticket. Since he's not buying a ticket, the employer should find the cheapest ticket available and pay that money. If the economy improves or worsens between now and when he actually uses the money to fly, that is the teachers fortune, not the schools.
It's simple for me - if they had included a clause that said you MUST leave, or you MUST take the ticket we give you, or some other section like that, they'd be right. But what they said is that he gets the airfare if he completes the job. He completed the job. Period. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
,,,,
Last edited by jrwhite82 on Mon Oct 31, 2011 1:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|