| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Floating World
Joined: 01 Oct 2011
Location: Here
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:40 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: |
�The skeptics raised valid points and everybody should have been a skeptic two years ago,� Muller said in a telephone interview. �And now we have confidence that the temperature rise that had previously been reported had been done without bias.�
Muller said that he came into the study �with a proper skepticism,� something scientists �should always have. I was somewhat bothered by the fact that there was not enough skepticism� before. |
The overall gist of the article seems to be that you should have been a skeptic prior to the release of his research, but now that he has spoken your skepticism can cease. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Now we still have to figure out if the heating of the world is also not partially due to normal fluctuations as witnessed in billions of years of history in the soil of our planet ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Floating World
Joined: 01 Oct 2011
Location: Here
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Juregen wrote: |
| Now we still have to figure out if the heating of the world is also not partially due to normal fluctuations as witnessed in billions of years of history in the soil of our planet ... |
Or if it's that AND mankind is speeding up the process. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ineverlie&I'malwaysri
Joined: 09 Aug 2011
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Those fluctuations throughout billions of years took place over a lot longer period than the last few decades we have seen recently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
