|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
meangradin

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:51 pm Post subject: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
I don't want to be an alarmist, but I own a hagwon in Ulsan and we were recently summoned to a government run meeting informing us of proposed changes to E-2 regulations. Basically, the rules are the same as before, criminal record checks (inside of Korea and from native countries), original degrees, etc... HOWEVER, these documents are to be handed in every year, and these rules apply to all employees, E-2's and F visa holders alike. Suffice to say, the hagwon owners went ballistic, as it is yet another example of the govt. making out lives more difficult.
I should note that the criminal record check requirement was vague. I asked a govt. officer what he meant by a criminal record check; was it an intra-Korean record check or an actual FBI check? Of course, he did not really know, but thought it meant the FBI as well as the Korean check. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I bet what was meant was an annual local check, in line with the newish public school policy (for all teachers, Korean & foreign) to submit a simple form with ID number & signature to the local police station to run against the national criminal data bank.
Anything more would be stupid. I really dont believe immigration honchos are stupid. One rationale of the ramped up entry requirements was to streamline & simplify immi procedures for law-abiding longtermers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
schwa wrote: |
I bet what was meant was an annual local check, in line with the newish public school policy (for all teachers, Korean & foreign) to submit a simple form with ID number & signature to the local police station to run against the national criminal data bank.
Anything more would be stupid. I really dont believe immigration honchos are stupid. One rationale of the ramped up entry requirements was to streamline & simplify immi procedures for law-abiding longtermers. |
They are probably talking about the new law as it pertains to verification of teachers by the local education offices.
They are the same as E2 requirements but were vague on implementation specifics and were meant to get around the loophole that non-E2s were slipping through.
Not sure how that one is going to work out.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
meangradin wrote: |
... HOWEVER, these documents are to be handed in every year, and these rules apply to all employees, E-2's and F visa holders alike. Suffice to say, the hagwon owners went ballistic, as it is yet another example of the govt. making out lives more difficult.
I should note that the criminal record check requirement was vague. I asked a govt. officer what he meant by a criminal record check; was it an intra-Korean record check or an actual FBI check? Of course, he did not really know, but thought it meant the FBI as well as the Korean check. |
Does anyone remember the huge fight between ATEK and the F-series visa people over exactly this issue? Looks like what I and the F-series people were pointing out is coming to pass.
And handing them in every year, even if you are re-signing?
China is looking better and better, if what you say comes true. I predict a shortage of teachers as the hassle of obtaining a CBC and certified copy of degree is going to get worse for long-term teachers here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:10 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
meangradin wrote: |
... HOWEVER, these documents are to be handed in every year, and these rules apply to all employees, E-2's and F visa holders alike. Suffice to say, the hagwon owners went ballistic, as it is yet another example of the govt. making out lives more difficult.
I should note that the criminal record check requirement was vague. I asked a govt. officer what he meant by a criminal record check; was it an intra-Korean record check or an actual FBI check? Of course, he did not really know, but thought it meant the FBI as well as the Korean check. |
Does anyone remember the huge fight between ATEK and the F-series visa people over exactly this issue? Looks like what I and the F-series people were pointing out is coming to pass.
And handing them in every year, even if you are re-signing?
China is looking better and better, if what you say comes true. I predict a shortage of teachers as the hassle of obtaining a CBC and certified copy of degree is going to get worse for long-term teachers here. |
Yeah and who wants to bet that teachers will find out about it too late to get a CBC done because it takes what, 12 weeks? Then immigration will be scrambling again to rewrite the rules to allow everyone an extra year to get their checks done.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riker

Joined: 28 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
South Korea has become a losing game when you calculate all the time + money just to get over there.
But the lemmings will still line up in droves for a job that doesn't pay health care, pension, and 30+ hours of teaching kids per week.
Unreal... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tideout
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
At
Last edited by tideout on Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
First of all this is not in effect as of yet. Second of all, like many such "new" regulations, it stands a high chance of being relaxed and modified before becoming official.
So, in essence, keep informed but perhaps its a tad early to pass judgement on the "viability of Korea for foreign teachers"
I know that sounds good and makes a loud bang but seriously now....
Still, working abroad has always been and always will be a comparative game. Foreign workers will go where they feel they get the best overal package in line with what they prefer. Korea will be chosen by some, China by others. Another issue is what can be called natural evolution of the asian esl-efl market. As such a market changes things happen. Look at Japan, over 15 years it went as the top ESL destination to a flooded market where requirements for jobs are higher and expenses for teachers are also higher. Korea will be no different and as the market shifts, the types of jobs and people that end up there will shift. Clearly the chinese market is wide open for the mass of entry-level positions with little to no requirements. That is a typical spark to grow an ES market populated with foreign teachers: ease of access and slightly improving pay conditions along with reasonable costs of living. So, what you will likely see is a shift for Mr or Mrs BA holder in anything with no experience from Korea to China.
The Korean market will then either struggle or move into another stage. Jobs for qualified teachers will however remain and the pay for these will remain far above the entry level positions that now flood the market.
Up to each of us to then decide where we feel the best opportunity lies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
earthquakez
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
As someone who used to get more pissed off with Korea than they should have over the past year but decided to stay on, I have to say that while these changes sound like more inconvenience, the more I hear about the insanity of Japan where I used to work, the better I feel about Korea.
The dysfunction and weirdness of Japan has really manifested itself with the 'Let the peasants be radiated for the sake of a farming minority and for preserving face' (deliberately sending radiated vegetables and other food from the danger areas to other parts of Japan for children and others to eat and making children eat them for school lunches over the protests of parents) as well as the sheer 16th century type of official responses to all aspects of the Fukushima and surrounding areas' disasters.
Japan's deeply ingrained autistic elements even after such an immense crisis should scare off anybody normal from working there. I honestly think Koreans would have come out fighting against such abuses of the population in the aftermath of a nuclear tragedy.
As for China - a country that sees nothing wrong by law in forcing women to have abortions, conducts public excecutions to serve as a warning to the masses, has its army running factories that openly manufacture fakes and industries based upon stealing the intellectual property and patents of the world, and harvests organs from prisoners not yet excecuted including those who have spiritual beliefs the regime opposes hardly offers a normal alternative. In China you also have to jump through hoops including medical check ups with a byzantine form and you cannot travel freely throughout the country.
Korea is a bastion of normality compared to these two, is far cleaner and better than other Asian countries, and is not excessive in its demands for documentation though it is a pain in the neck to get the information together. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrwhite82

Joined: 22 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I knew you'd come around earthquakez  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hagwonnewbie

Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Location: Asia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never submitted a national cbc and I'm still teaching on my e-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riker

Joined: 28 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've had many friends move from Japan to Korea and vice-verse and the opinion is always the same.
Japan, even in its depressed state is WAY better than Korea, just for the simple fact that you can openly do Privates and nobody cares. Also not being a visa slave to your work does wonders for the stress level.
The fact that you can't do privates without fear of deportation makes South Korea an annoying undertaking for sure.
I know guys in Saudi Arabia who do [Mod Edit] privates and nobody cares. The School even lets him use his office. SAUDI ARABIA !!!
Privates and Visa security are the holy grail of ESL teaching, and South Korea has neither. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
big_fella1
Joined: 08 Dec 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:20 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
meangradin wrote: |
I don't want to be an alarmist, but I own a hagwon in Ulsan and we were recently summoned to a government run meeting informing us of proposed changes to E-2 regulations. Basically, the rules are the same as before, criminal record checks (inside of Korea and from native countries), original degrees, etc... HOWEVER, these documents are to be handed in every year, and these rules apply to all employees, E-2's and F visa holders alike. Suffice to say, the hagwon owners went ballistic, as it is yet another example of the govt. making out lives more difficult.
I should note that the criminal record check requirement was vague. I asked a govt. officer what he meant by a criminal record check; was it an intra-Korean record check or an actual FBI check? Of course, he did not really know, but thought it meant the FBI as well as the Korean check. |
This sounds like the education office rather than immigration or a change to E2's. If they required home criminal checks every year even if we hadn't left Korea that would be pretty stupid and a huge disincentive to teaching here and I speak as an F visa holder.
Please not another ill conceived knee jerk reaction to a problem that doesn't exist. We cannot commit a crime in our home country if we are here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:57 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
big_fella1 wrote: |
meangradin wrote: |
I don't want to be an alarmist, but I own a hagwon in Ulsan and we were recently summoned to a government run meeting informing us of proposed changes to E-2 regulations. Basically, the rules are the same as before, criminal record checks (inside of Korea and from native countries), original degrees, etc... HOWEVER, these documents are to be handed in every year, and these rules apply to all employees, E-2's and F visa holders alike. Suffice to say, the hagwon owners went ballistic, as it is yet another example of the govt. making out lives more difficult.
I should note that the criminal record check requirement was vague. I asked a govt. officer what he meant by a criminal record check; was it an intra-Korean record check or an actual FBI check? Of course, he did not really know, but thought it meant the FBI as well as the Korean check. |
This sounds like the education office rather than immigration or a change to E2's. If they required home criminal checks every year even if we hadn't left Korea that would be pretty stupid and a huge disincentive to teaching here and I speak as an F visa holder.
Please not another ill conceived knee jerk reaction to a problem that doesn't exist. We cannot commit a crime in our home country if we are here. |
Well see that's the thing. Neither Immigration or our schools want to do the work to find out if we left (for vacation back to our country.) There are thousands of E-2 visa holders and add in the F-holders...too much work for Immigration to check up on all of them. Much simpler to request CBC's every year.
Yeah it doesn't make much sense, but what other options do they have? They can't possibly check everyone every year unless they have several officers committed to that alone full-time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:21 pm Post subject: Re: Rumblings of new government regulations |
|
|
Worrisome stuff if it goes through.
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
China is looking better and better, if what you say comes true. I predict a shortage of teachers as the hassle of obtaining a CBC and certified copy of degree is going to get worse for long-term teachers here. |
The problem is that not every F visa can just up and transplant. It might get a lot of long termers with F visas to go ahead and apply for citizenship since dual citizenship is allowed here now, but otherwise, they have the potential to kick out people who have made families here if they don't submit yearly CBCs from back home.
I'm fine with CBCs but F visas should only require a local check, and perhaps a check from home country once.
Two steps forward, one step back... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|