View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
austinmc86
Joined: 23 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 3:36 am Post subject: pasteurized makgeolli |
|
|
Is pasteurized makgeolli healthy? I know the regular makgeolli has some health benefits, but what about this type? I ask, because it is cheaper, and I have been drinking 'a lot' lately. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DanseurVertical
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:14 am Post subject: Re: pasteurized makgeolli |
|
|
austinmc86 wrote: |
Is pasteurized makgeolli healthy? I know the regular makgeolli has some health benefits, but what about this type? I ask, because it is cheaper, and I have been drinking 'a lot' lately. |
I seriously doubt that any unpasteurized sort has any meaningful health benefits, assuming your diet is okay to begin with.
But whatever the case, what are you taking about, anyway? If you can't read the bottle to tell us the name, then how do you know it's pasteurized?
To me, I prefer whatever's brewed without artificial chemicals (which by volume excludes about 99% of Korea's "traditional rice wine"). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rutherford
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Usually the unpasteurized stuff is marked 생 and has a much shorter shelf life. Something like 10-12 days vs. months for pateurized Makgeolli.
I think they say it's healthy because it has life yeast and/or bacteria. So it's probiotic. I think if that's what you're looking for your probably better off eating some yogurt.
What bothers me is that they make a big deal about it being alive and good for your health then they add aspartame. Health concerns aside, I'd rather have the natural sour taste than the fake sweet taste.
Anyone know a good local Busan brand that's live with no aspartame? Even the Geumjeong mountain stuff has it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thunderbird
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its all good |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thunderbird
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its all good |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Skipperoo
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was under the impression that unpasteurised milk was much more dangerous to drink than pasteurised? I don't really know anything about it, but doesn't the former potentially contain all sorts of nasties? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rutherford
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The difference, Skiperoo, is that makgeolli is a fermented product like yogurt, wine, and beer. Yeast grow in makgeolli and convert the rice sugars to alcohol. You can be pretty sure it's safe to drink if it ferments correctly. If harmful bacteria contaminate it before it's fermented it will have a different taste or appearance that warns you not to drink it. Once it has been fermented most of the sugar (food for bacteria) is gone and the alcohol and sometimes other chemicals created by the living yeast prevent outside organisms from contaminating it.
This is also why raw milk is considered dangerous (mostly just in the US) while raw milk yogurt and cheese is normal in Europe. If it's fermented correctly it's unlikely any dangerous bacteria are present. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|