Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Another Grammar Question....

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kneezah~



Joined: 08 Jan 2009

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:54 am    Post subject: Another Grammar Question.... Reply with quote

"It is I that is going to meet Jim tomorrow."

My friend asked me if this sentence makes sense... It's a weird sentence. It's definitely not something someone would say, but is it grammatically correct? I typed it into word and I didn't get a grammar error. I guess it's weird to combine "I" and "is" in a sentence, but it seems okay. Any thoughts?^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:44 am    Post subject: Re: Another Grammar Question.... Reply with quote

kneezah~ wrote:
"It is I that is going to meet Jim tomorrow."

My friend asked me if this sentence makes sense... It's a weird sentence. It's definitely not something someone would say, but is it grammatically correct? I typed it into word and I didn't get a grammar error. I guess it's weird to combine "I" and "is" in a sentence, but it seems okay. Any thoughts?^^


hmm...
it comes down to the old...do you accept
It is I. or It is me. (which do you prefer?)
Both are defensible...though It is I...is a true prescriptive grammarians wet dream.

If we rewrite the sentence with a proper noun, the sentence is very easy to accept.
It is Paul that(who) is going to meet Jim tomorrow.
It is Paul - Independent Clause
that is going to meet Jim tomorrow - dependent clause.

As for the OP...there is a lot of debate on this but prescriptively it is defensible.
There are many prescriptive grammarians who still cling to ... It is I.

The rule that governed(note past tense) that construction is often under debate itself.
If it ever was a prescriptive rule...it has long been abandoned...and more to the point...has been actively rejected in modern English usage.

But the 'rule' is out there...
When using linking verbs....the pronoun following the linking verb should be in subjective(nominative) case.
so we get
It is I.

So in short, to answer your question...the sentence is fine...wickedly archaic...but grammatically correct.
Hope this is useful. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FMPJ



Joined: 03 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sentence is grammatically correct (but of course also awful). The convention is that the pronouns on both sides of a linking verb must have the same case. Since "It" is the subject of the verb "is," the first-person pronoun should be in the subject case.

(The above is strictly for "Standard Written English" and is not at all prescriptive.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International