View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:29 pm Post subject: 2012 Election Thread |
|
|
Shouldn't this thread exist?
http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results
Ohio is to watch, correct?
Drudge says:
ROMNEY WINS: AL, GA, IN, KY, MS, OK, SC, TN, WV...
OBAMA WINS: CT, DC, DE, IL, MA, ME, MD, RI, VT... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lucas
Joined: 11 Sep 2012
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can see a line of what looks like several hundred people still waiting to vote in Brickell. How does that work. Polling closed at 7. It's likely that the election will be called for Obama when these people are still waiting to vote. Doesn't seem like a sensible system. Not that the Brickell types will lean Republican. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alan Greyson is back! Looking good! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
Native Americans finally get some representation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Titus wrote: |
Kuros wrote: |
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
Native Americans finally get some representation. |
Something stupid something something. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
Titus wrote: |
Kuros wrote: |
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
Native Americans finally get some representation. |
Something stupid something something. |
Hey now!
I guess if a man can decide he is woman a WASP can decide she's an Amerindian. Mustn't discriminate. We shall overcome.
...
So this is the end of the Republican Party. It will never be able to win POTUS b/c of demographics. The United States just took one large lurch to official one-party status. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fox
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Titus wrote: |
So this is the end of the Republican Party. It will never be able to win POTUS b/c of demographics. The United States just took one large lurch to official one-party status. |
If the media "controls our minds," then how are demographics even relevant? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Back to blood. It is and only ever has been whites who were deracinated through media propaganda. Universalist conservatism and liberalism are entirely white things. Unless the media is going to push black and Hispanic versions of all in the family. Which it won't, because blacks and mestizos do not and will never threaten the reign of usury. Whites are divided and vibrants united. One party state.
Or do you want to argue that advertising doesn't work? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
What's so great about Elizabeth Warren? Her economic theories are an embarrassment, and have been handily debunked. She was busy telling people "you didn't build that" well before Obama made it fashionable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fox
Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Titus wrote: |
Whites are divided and vibrants united. One party state. |
1) If whites weren't politically divided, we really would have a one party state. You're taking a feature of America which has preserved the two-party system and confusingly attributing to it the destruction of the two-party system.
2) A one party state does not see phenomenon like its lower legislative house controlled by one party while its presidency and/or upper house is controlled by another. Are you predicting democrat super-majority wins for the House and Senate on top of the Presidency?
Titus wrote: |
Or do you want to argue that advertising doesn't work? |
I want to argue that it doesn't work the way you think it does. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fosterman
Joined: 16 Nov 2011
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just happy to see that smug smirked face Romney and his wife finally off the TV's! BYE BYE and good riddance! his policies are reckless and dangerous!!
see ya !!! Loser! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leon
Joined: 31 May 2010
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visitorq wrote: |
Kuros wrote: |
Elizabeth Warren prevails over the bankster's golden boy in Massachusetts. This is good. |
What's so great about Elizabeth Warren? Her economic theories are an embarrassment, and have been handily debunked. She was busy telling people "you didn't build that" well before Obama made it fashionable. |
Being debunked on the Mises site just means something doesn't follow their economic view points, not that it is actually wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Titus wrote: |
So this is the end of the Republican Party. It will never be able to win POTUS b/c of demographics. The United States just took one large lurch to official one-party status. |
Not if the GOP distances itself from the wack jobs like the Dems did after the '84 and '88 debacles.
Seriously, if the party stops sounding so anti-immigrant and spouting "voodo science" like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock did, it might do better. I wouldn't hold my breath on those changes anytime soon though.
Nice to see Nate Silver was pretty accurate in his forecast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|