View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lorenchristopher

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: Dear Korea Times, Seriously?! |
|
|
Kim Jong-un named Sexiest Man Alive for 2012
The Onion has announce that North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-un, 29, has officially been named the newspaper�s Sexiest Man Alive for the year 2012.
�With his devastatingly handsome, round face, his boyish charm, and his strong, sturdy frame, this Pyongyang-bred heartthrob is every woman�s dream come true,� the paper reported.
�Blessed with an air of power that masks an unmistakable cute, cuddly side,� Kim made the newspaper�s editorial board swoon with �his impeccable fashion sense, chic short hairstyle, and, of course, that famous smile,� according to the paper.
�He has that rare ability to somehow be completely adorable and completely macho at the same time,� Onion Style and Entertainment editor Marissa Blake-Zweibel said.
�And that�s the quality that makes him the sort of man women want, and men want to be. He�s a real hunk with real intensity who also knows how to cut loose and let his hair down.�
Added Blake-Zweibel, �Ri Sol-ju is one lucky lady, that�s for sure!� (The onion)
With today�s announcement, Kim joins the ranks of The Onion�s prior �Sexiest Man Alive� winners, including:
� 2011: Bashar al-Assad
� 2010: Bernie Madoff
� 2009: Charles and David Koch (co-winners)
� 2008: Ted Kaczynski
� 2007: T. Herman Zweibel
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2012/11/511_125019.html
*facepalm* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hogwonguy1979

Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: the racoon den
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the Korean translation mentions The Onion is a satire site so nothing new here |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aq8knyus
Joined: 28 Jul 2010 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
18일(현지시간) CNN방송 등 현지 언론에 따르면 신랄한 풍자물로 유명한 인터넷매체 `디 어니언(The Onion)'은 김정은을 `2012년 살아있는 최고의 섹시 남성(Sexist Man Alive for the year 2012)'으로 뽑았다. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
highstreet
Joined: 13 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thread delete in progress |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lorenchristopher

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They couldn't have put "the satirical news source the Onion...." in any of those sentences in the English article? Why is it in the Korean version but not the English? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hogwonguy1979

Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: the racoon den
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Stamos jr.
Joined: 07 Oct 2012 Location: Namsan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slow Newsday story. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dairyairy
Joined: 17 May 2012 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't the Korea Times also run one of the Weekly World News stories about the Loch Ness Monster winning the lottery as a serious story? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dairyairy
Joined: 17 May 2012 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Korea Times removed the article? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the print edition yesterday they ran the story quite prominently under the headline "China's party paper falls for Onion joke about Kim Jong-un." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Loren the paper was MAKING fun of the Chinese news agency that quoted the Onion without knowing it was a satire...
Read up before you set yourself on fire in outrage Loren (that was a joke too ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fezmond
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
dairyairy wrote: |
Didn't the Korea Times also run one of the Weekly World News stories about the Loch Ness Monster winning the lottery as a serious story? |
They ran a story about alien graveyards in Rwanda. Not sure about Nessie. The worst part about the whole thing was not that they didn't do any fact checking but that it was simply stolen from WWN. Unless of course the same person wrote both articles.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|