View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gladiator
Joined: 23 May 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 10:49 pm Post subject: Korea's problem with individualism. |
|
|
Thought this well-written article hit the nail quite squarely on the head.
Enjoy.
http://www.stanford.edu/~donhkim/es3.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Barking Mad Lord Snapcase
Joined: 04 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
The author makes many good points. However, I wonder how a culture with so much emphasis on hierarchy and seniority would value the concept of equality. There may be a conditional equality, perhaps (based on age or nationality), but even here the rules of seniority come into play (ie. you are "superior" if you are one year older).
I suspect that Korean conformity is defined not so much by equality (which is quantitative) but by "sameness" (which is qualitative). While the Western ideal is to be "equal but different", the Korean ideal seems to be "the same but unequal". The workers obey the boss because he is visible. The boss runs a red light because the inherent danger - and the law itself - are invisible abstractions that do not fit into his worldview. Yet despite allusions to authority or fashionable "rebellion", members of all social strata fail to see outside the tunnel of tradition, no matter how fast they are moving. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This guy sounds like an Ayn Rand objectivist dork who's shocked to find a nation even more "collectivist" than his years of reading libertarian newsletters have led him to believe his homeland is. He makes some accurate(if mostly unoriginal) observations, and his tone is generally respectful. But(as he himself admits), there's a lot of generaliztion.
Quote: |
Maybe so, but I wonder how many of them have seriously thought about freedom and individualism. Depending on parents' generous allowances to buy "funky" clothes has nothing to do with true individualism and freedom, which I believe, cannot be achieved without some measure of independence. In fact, I suspect many of the new-generation gestures might be superficial and still adhere to the collective norm. |
Well, maybe this guy's pals back home sat around hashing out the nuances of freedom and individualism over a case of Bud and a copy of Isaiah Berlin, but I doubt that's the average Saturday night for most North American young adults. In my experience, most people are simply content with whatever degree of freedom their society affords, and don't spend too much time imagining alternatives.
Quote: |
The word "fraternity" cannot quite capture the meaning and nuiance of the Korean word "ui-ri". I've seen plenty of Koreans who care more about this than honesty. They would be even willing to take exams for their close friend to help them. If some political figure goes to jail to to cover a corrupt boss, many people hail his courage and sacrifice. |
Well, when North Americans cheat on exams its usually for reasons of individual self-advancement, so I'm not sure about the "individualism=honesty" formula here. As for politics, I think Koreans are a bit more cynical than the writer gives them credit for. I discuss politics all the time in my discussion classes, and I've never heard it said that there is anything beautiful about taking the fall for a corrupt boss. People in Gwangju are fairly partisan, and if some GNP flunky went to jail for his boss, I doubt they'd be holding him up as a human ideal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
People in Gwangju are fairly partisan, and if some GNP flunky went to jail for his boss, I doubt they'd be holding him up as a human ideal. |
That's because the GNP party is very unpopular here I doubt they'd hold up a GNP party member who raised money for a charity as a human ideal in Gwangju. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blind Willie
Joined: 05 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
To play Devil's Advocate for a second:
Confucian society= Roughly 3000 years and still going.
Rugged American Indvidualism= About 200, forecast looks gloomy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some of what this guy said reminded me of the book Korea Unmasked.
He talked about equality in Korea.
In N.A. when we talk about equality we usually mean equality before the law. However here in Korea equality is different. In the Korea Unmasked the author argues that in Korea people aren't trying to get ahead, they are trying not to fall behind. Why do parents send their kids to hogwons? Its not to get ahead. Its so they don't fall behind the neighbours kid. People are only equal if they have the same job, come from the same background, live in the same area, and make the same amount of money. If a person in a group of people suddenly has a better, or worse job, then that person is kicked out of the group.
I agree on the jealousy and pettiness of koreans. Ever hear how korean women talk about famous korean women. They look down on them because they all had plastic surgery or have fake boobs. Yet all of them want to have plastic surgery and fake boobs.
interesting article |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Read Korea Unmasked,
It made for an interesting read but was too biased and tilted in my opinion.
Also, people tend to draw just what they want from such books, i.e. they just read them to reinforce pre-conceived notions about a topic or subject.
Then they claim their opinions to be founded on something written.
This book did a great job of doing that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
indiercj

Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just love everyone who posted on this thread.
Interesting views.
You just keep me coming back.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Homer wrote: |
Read Korea Unmasked,
It made for an interesting read but was too biased and tilted in my opinion.
Also, people tend to draw just what they want from such books, i.e. they just read them to reinforce pre-conceived notions about a topic or subject.
Then they claim their opinions to be founded on something written.
This book did a great job of doing that. |
That's likely quite true.
I also thought it was too biased and tilted, but would be willing to bet that you and I thought it was biased and tilted in opposite directions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I also thought it was too biased and tilted, but would be willing to bet that you and I thought it was biased and tilted in opposite directions. |
Perhaps dogbert.
Then again maybe not.
Or, maybe yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThisCharmingMan

Joined: 11 Jan 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
The word "fraternity" cannot quite capture the meaning and nuiance of the Korean word "ui-ri". I've seen plenty of Koreans who care more about this than honesty. They would be even willing to take exams for their close friend to help them. If some political figure goes to jail to to cover a corrupt boss, many people hail his courage and sacrifice. |
Well, when North Americans cheat on exams its usually for reasons of individual self-advancement, so I'm not sure about the "individualism=honesty" formula here. |
When does he compare "individualism=honesty"?
If "fraternity>individualism" and "fraternity>honesty", it does not necessitate "individualism=honesty".
He is only stating that he would personally rate "honesty>fraternity".
And your thinking about another person taking an exam in place for another, right?Then in this case like Koreans, "fraternity>honesty". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
And your thinking about another person taking an exam in place for another, right?Then in this case like Koreans, "fraternity>honesty". |
But does the person taking the test get something in return? Like say for example, Kim writes Park's literature test for him, and then Park turns around and writes Kim's chemistry test. If(as I suspect) the favours are often reciprocated, then there is a basic element of self-interest involved, albeit mediated through collective arrangemants.
Point taken that the writer never explicitly equated individualism with honesty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThisCharmingMan

Joined: 11 Jan 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
And your thinking about another person taking an exam in place for another, right?Then in this case like Koreans, "fraternity>honesty". |
But does the person taking the test get something in return? Like say for example, Kim writes Park's literature test for him, and then Park turns around and writes Kim's chemistry test. If(as I suspect) the favours are often reciprocated, then there is a basic element of self-interest involved, albeit mediated through collective arrangemants.
|
It's more like: Kim writes dunderhead Park's literature test for him and then Park turns around and buys Kim a round of drinks and dong-chims him on the way home. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gladiator
Joined: 23 May 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:29 pm Post subject: Individualism |
|
|
Quote: |
To play Devil's Advocate for a second:
Confucian society= Roughly 3000 years and still going.
Rugged American Indvidualism= About 200, forecast looks gloomy |
Maybe, but how much has the world and global society changed since the bronze age? The Romans and Greeks gave up worshipping Apollo thousands of years ago. Thankfully they stopped burning witches somewhere in the 17th century so why can't Korea finally shake off some of its primitive beliefs (subjugating women, venerating age and status harmony at the expense of everything else, including getting a job done well) that are standing in the way of its cherished dream (or at least that's what it seems to be according to the mouldy rhetoric the government has been churing out to the population constantly all these years like Satan's farts) of a truly modern and globalized society.
As the writer implied so acidly in his conclusions, Korea is going to be the industrial and cultural leader of nothing while tied up in the intellectual straightjackets of Confucianism, Korean conformity and groupthink.
Can anybody honestly dispute that summary? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What has confucian societies done lately.
China invented a lot of stuff, but all that was a long time ago. What have they done lately. All the new developments, technology and thinking have come from the west.
One of the basic ideas of confucianism is what worked in the past should work in the future. Its not a philosphy that encourages new thought.
In only reason Asia is modernising is a result of contact with western countries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|