View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2015 2:59 am Post subject: Nut Rage Victim Wins Claim |
|
|
From here:
Quote: |
Korean Air 'nut rage' victim gets industrial injury recognition
The Korean Air chief steward ejected from a flight by a senior airline executive in a now infamous "nut rage" incident, has had his industrial injury claim approved by a state agency, officials said Wednesday.
The recognition comes as Park Chang-Jin is reportedly preparing to file a lawsuit in US court demanding $50-million-dollar damages from Korean Air for the abuse he claims he suffered at the hand of Cho Hyun-Ah, a former vice-president of the airline. |
More at the link.
Ah, Korea...the sparkle's starting to show. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chellovek

Joined: 29 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2015 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Christ, $50 million is a bit steep.
But otherwise, good for him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
chellovek wrote: |
Christ, $50 million is a bit steep.
But otherwise, good for him. |
Not really, by US standards. He'll ask for $50 million and then it'll get settled out of course for an undisclosed sum of a couple mil. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scorpion
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fallacy
Joined: 29 Jun 2015 Location: ex-ROK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note "US court" and not "ROK court" for the filing. Why? Jurisdiction for where and when the incident occurred? Statistically increased probability for an out of court settlement for undisclosed terms as northway suggests? Or perhaps a more vengeful, conspiracy-driven plotline? Tune in for more to come on the next episode of "Chaebol families gone wild." As for Hilton, both he and his father neither own nor run anything, so not an equitable comparison. More likely, he was trying to draw attention not to his lesser known self, but toward his more famous siblings. Yawn. The reward for this banal act was guerrilla advertising, since we all stopped to gawk. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|