Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Future Legacy of President HRC
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How will the HRC Presidency be regarded?
Positive and rewarding
27%
 27%  [ 3 ]
Negative and disappointing
72%
 72%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 11

Author Message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, and they make a very unattractive ticket - fortunately for them, the Republican ticket is so hideously ugly ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Fallacy



Joined: 29 Jun 2015
Location: ex-ROK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:16 pm    Post subject: RE: The Future Legacy of President HRC Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Plain Meaning wrote:
Her Vice President will likely be either Vilsack or Kaine (80% certainty). Clinton can actually control Kaine's replacement through her pawn McAuliffe. Either might shore up a half of a percent in terms of voting share in swing states. I prefer Vilsack because Kaine is a another goddamned Harvard Law grad.
If she goes with Kaine, she will basically affirm she's about as predictable and risk-adverse a politician as we've ever seen. Those aren't good traits for someone going against the Trumpster.
Oops. Kaine it is. Oh well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:38 am    Post subject: Re: RE: The Future Legacy of President HRC Reply with quote

Fallacy wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Plain Meaning wrote:
Her Vice President will likely be either Vilsack or Kaine (80% certainty). Clinton can actually control Kaine's replacement through her pawn McAuliffe. Either might shore up a half of a percent in terms of voting share in swing states. I prefer Vilsack because Kaine is a another goddamned Harvard Law grad.
If she goes with Kaine, she will basically affirm she's about as predictable and risk-adverse a politician as we've ever seen. Those aren't good traits for someone going against the Trumpster.
Oops. Kaine it is. Oh well.


Yeah, I was originally going to say I was 99% certain she would pick him, but decided to be as risk-adverse as her and hedge my prediction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallacy



Joined: 29 Jun 2015
Location: ex-ROK

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 6:02 am    Post subject: RE: The Future Legacy of President HRC Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Fallacy wrote:
bucheon bum wrote:
Plain Meaning wrote:
Her Vice President will likely be either Vilsack or Kaine (80% certainty). Clinton can actually control Kaine's replacement through her pawn McAuliffe. Either might shore up a half of a percent in terms of voting share in swing states. I prefer Vilsack because Kaine is a another goddamned Harvard Law grad.
If she goes with Kaine, she will basically affirm she's about as predictable and risk-adverse a politician as we've ever seen. Those aren't good traits for someone going against the Trumpster.
Oops. Kaine it is. Oh well.
Yeah, I was originally going to say I was 99% certain she would pick him, but decided to be as risk-adverse as her and hedge my prediction.
Excellent humor at HRC's expense! On the plus side, TMK speaks Spanish. However, after the pro-women speech given by Ivanka, HRC should have picked her as VP. That would have been a radical move, something along the lines of rerunning McCain's pick of Palin. Hillary/Ivanka 2016!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Unigwont



Joined: 11 Jul 2016

PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hubris.

Hahaha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goat



Joined: 23 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Otus wrote:
A small fortune could be made finding T supporters and nailing them down to bets. At least they must be convinced he is serious about winning. This will be fun once his nomination is secured.


. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J.Q.A.



Joined: 09 Feb 2017
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

goat wrote:
Otus wrote:
A small fortune could be made finding T supporters and nailing them down to bets. At least they must be convinced he is serious about winning. This will be fun once his nomination is secured.


. Laughing




...wait for the side step...the excuse(s)...."Russia...Bush (OK..I'll sponsor some of that)...Obama..(definitley)...Sanders was cheated (by the DNC..but...he is a coward anyway)...9/11 was outside of U.S. government control...Bill Oreilly is a racist...Fox News is the Anti-Christ...there is no left-wing media bias....right wing conspiracy theory....he did not inhale."




...ah well...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

J.Q.A. wrote:
9/11 was outside of U.S. government control


Those who buy into truther "conspiracy theories" do so for reasons other than evidence. Evidence shows that it was bin Laden and his outfit, not the US government, involved in those attacks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J.Q.A.



Joined: 09 Feb 2017
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
J.Q.A. wrote:
9/11 was outside of U.S. government control


Those who buy into truther "conspiracy theories" do so for reasons other than evidence. Evidence shows that it was bin Laden and his outfit, not the US government, involved in those attacks.



Indeed...like the theory the government was not involved in that. Or, how those two towers just neatly collapsed...(WTC #7 is interesting)...THAT is a conspiracy theory.

So...go on...say whatever you wish....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The towers did not fall "neatly".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J.Q.A.



Joined: 09 Feb 2017
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
The towers did not fall "neatly".



Sure they did...very demolition, like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankhenry



Joined: 13 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who is HRC?

huhuhuhuhuhu

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

frankhenry wrote:
Who is HRC?

huhuhuhuhuhu

.


Hillary Rodham Clinton won 65,853,516 votes in the 2016 Presidential election. This was the highest vote tally in that election, and the second highest vote tally amounted to 62,984,825 votes. At 48.2% of the vote, this was not enough to secure her the Presidency due to an affirmative action program historically known as the 'Electoral College.'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
J.Q.A.



Joined: 09 Feb 2017
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
frankhenry wrote:
Who is HRC?

huhuhuhuhuhu

.


Hillary Rodham Clinton won 65,853,516 votes in the 2016 Presidential election. This was the highest vote tally in that election, and the second highest vote tally amounted to 62,984,825 votes. At 48.2% of the vote, this was not enough to secure her the Presidency due to an affirmative action program historically known as the 'Electoral College.'


That is right...why should New York and that crap hole known as California decide the fate of the rest of the country?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International