View previous topic :: View next topic |
So Queens English or "US" English then? |
I'm a North American, so teach US spelling |
|
65% |
[ 19 ] |
I'm a Non-N.American and I teach US spelling *cough* [i]traitor[/i] |
|
17% |
[ 5 ] |
I'm a Non-N.American and I teach correct English spelling! |
|
17% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 29 |
|
Author |
Message |
dodgybarnet

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Location: Directly above the centre of the earth. On a kickboard.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 3:47 am Post subject: US English?? Microsoft will be informed of their error... |
|
|
I was really tempted to Flame-bait the entire North American Continent for spelling words wrongly, but have have thought better of it and made a poll instead.
I'm interested in whether Non-N.Americans teach US English (with the letter "z" thrown around like they want higher Scrabble scores) or are not swayed by the Yank/Canuk conspiracy to taint the Queen's English.
Seriously though, I'm just interested because I have enough trooble speeeling vords anyway, so trying to consciously teach US English doesn't sound like a good move in my case.
Whatcha think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Son Deureo!
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
You left out the fourth possibility of course, which is North American who teaches the Queen's English.
Shock and horror! How can that be?
The textbook writing department of my hogwon chain has been at least partially commandeered by Commonwealthers, so British spelling comes up constantly. Obviously I'm not going to tell them that the Queen's English is incorrect, so when the issue comes up I tell them both U.S. and British spelling so they can make up their own minds about what to use.
All the same, the difference between the two is such a fine point compared to the more basic issues of fluency our students usually need to address that I can't see any good reason to lose much sleep over this regardless of where you learned to speak English. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ryleeys

Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: Columbia, MD
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I think American English is the natural evolution of the language.
But personally, I want a new alphabet. I want English consonants and Korean vowels. I hate the idea of short and long vowels. One letter, one sound damnit (excluding "c" and "g" of course... they do have their uses... but with Korean vowels, maybe we can get rid of the "c").
I teach American spelling and strictly correct any of my students that have been corrupted by the Old World. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ladyandthetramp

Joined: 21 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
You also forgot the choice "I'm a Non-N.American and I teach British English spelling!"
Seems the second and third choices are the same... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Penny Ur commented on this once (maybe more than once, but only once that I heard).
Her contention is basically the with the spread of English some things will become simplified in terms of grammar and spelling. As a rule, the simpler version will be the one that will be adopted and, in the case of spelling, the simpler version is usually the American one. Teachers, in an effort to teach English as a global language rather than their own parochial little version of it should probably teach, in this case, American spelling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ladyandthetramp

Joined: 21 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
the_beaver wrote: |
Penny Ur commented on this once (maybe more than once, but only once that I heard).
Her contention is basically the with the spread of English some things will become simplified in terms of grammar and spelling. As a rule, the simpler version will be the one that will be adopted and, in the case of spelling, the simpler version is usually the American one. Teachers, in an effort to teach English as a global language rather than their own parochial little version of it should probably teach, in this case, American spelling. |
Doesn't seem like a very strong argument. I don't think the spelling really differs enough to matter. Maybe the Koreans could make a new alphabet for English, call it yeonggul, and become really powerful and force everyone to adopt it...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pet lover
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: not in Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
This post serves no purpose.
Last edited by pet lover on Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
One must know both, and teach both. It's not so hard, as the number of differences is not that great.
On a related note. I agree with some of the american changes and not others. Colour does not need the "u". But the "z" replacing "se" is not necessary, because it's the "e" after the "s" that denotes the sound change, and the americans retain the final "e" anyway, so the change to "z" is redundant. Also, it's not consistantly applied. Someone shoud rise to the occasion and fix this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mog

Joined: 06 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if there was the internet a thousand of years ago, there'd be a thread like this about spelling English words with French rules (William the Conquerer was from Normandy).
Language is spoken first, written second. If they spell it any particularly accepted way and pronounce it correctly, then it's okay in my book. Spelling is very secondary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the Queen should have kept a shorter leash on the language when her imperialist family went around the world on an imperialist coloniZing frenzy.
Hehe...just joking...don't get your knickers in a knot.
Personally, I don't really care. It's actually good to see the language changing....with so many speakers of English spread so far and wide, it was bound to happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
panthermodern

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Taxronto
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Customer wants U.S. English ... the Customer gets U.S. English.
I spell "Colour": c-o-l-o-r in class
I say "Zed" : Zee in class
Besides, I think many of the "Queen's English" nouns are just that ... nouns used by "Queens"
For example:
Jumper: Do you like my new jumper?
Tumbler: Would you like a tumbler of Freshie?
And so on.
BUT: Lego is and shall forever be an uncountable noun and tomatos are a type of fruit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jazblanc77

Joined: 22 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice poll, it was only slightly biased towards your own self-righteous view of North Americans. I'm Canadian and I have always used QUEENS ENLGISH (in fact most universities penalise the use of American English in academic writing).
In Korea, public school teachers have mainly been teaching their students American English, just as in most of Europe, students have been taught Queen's English (though this is changing a lot these days; noone wants to speak like a Brit anymore it seems). My outlook on the whole issue is, why make learning English any more difficult on my students that it has to be? If they already know one way to spell a word, why confuse them by telling them another (unless, that is, they are high enough of a level and could benefit from it). We should focus more on teaching them to use our language correctly than worrying about silly symantics over which spelling is being used.
Will you still understand an English speaker who spells "incorrectly"? That's the real question. Stop being so proud of yourself and get with the programme.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dodgybarnet

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Location: Directly above the centre of the earth. On a kickboard.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The OP was intentionally a bit toungue-in-cheek, certainly as there is no such thing as a "right choice" when it comes to language - it's constantly evolving. It's just fun to yank a few chains.
I guess when it comes to teaching, being consistent is the number one thing to do.
Quote: |
Nice poll, it was only slightly biased towards your own self-righteous view of North Americans. I'm Canadian and I have always used QUEENS ENLGISH (in fact most universities penalise the use of American English in academic writing)... |
Just trying to be funny Consider your chain well and truly yanked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ghostshadow

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I teach USA spelling because that's what most parents wants from their children. One of main reason why Korea is so keen on learning English is because they need English to get a job in Korea. The market for a job in Korea is very low and in order to get a desk job you need to know English. And why the USA spelling, because they want to do more business with USA.
Those are my thoughts from the information gathered while in Korea... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zed

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Shakedown Street
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I say Zed on here. I say Zee in class.
- Zed |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|