View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:41 am Post subject: Salaries and the crashing dollar |
|
|
Arguing from the fact that salaries went up significantly back around '98-'99 because of the fall of the won, it is possible that teachers' salaries will be negatively affected by the nose-diving dollar.
Does anyone see it differently? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
For around 50 or so years...the Won was "stronger" than the US dollar. Even around pre-IMF it was around 800 Won. I am sure some old timers remember it being around 600 Won to the dollar.
IMF comes along and koreans are screaming, crying, jumping off bridges and buildings, etc...
Did the Americans complain for 50 years that the Won was "stronger?"
No.
So...if you are paid in Won...nows the time to buy dollars!! If it gets below 1000 Won...more better for teachers or those paid in Won!
Will salaries will be negatively affected by the nose-diving dollar? No reason why they should...unless teachers start signing BS contracts for 1.8/1.7, etc...
The dollar will always be one of the stronger currencies. It goes up an down. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Will salaries will be negatively affected by the nose-diving dollar? No reason why they should...unless teachers start signing BS contracts for 1.8/1.7, etc..."
Did you see of the jobs on the Job board? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just checked out the first 12 jobs on this site and only one was starting at 1.7. All the others are 2.0 and up.
1.7? A fool would agree to that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shifty
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before the slide, there had been pressure on the Chinese to revalue or even float the yuan. Now it is yoked to the dollar and therefore this pressure must surely increase, as the dollar subsides.
Probably the Asian currencies will appreciate in concert against the dollar, so that Korea will remain competitive exportwise. The domestic Korean economy needs to be stimulated and there is a growing realisation that to conjure prosperity with an artificial currency is no answer.
I think the future looks bright for the thrifty efl'er. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drakoi

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Location: The World
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
only a fool would accept 2.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Canadian $ vs the Won is pretty bleh right now. When I got here in 2002 it was 750W to the $, last week I paid 939 Won...bleh! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThePoet
Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: No longer in Korea - just lurking here
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
All I can say is, I've never seen so many Uni jobs that only offer 1.65 - 1.85 before this year. I couldn't believe how low they offer...I guess they figure (and rightfully so based on the views) that because they are a Uni, they'll get people willing to take less for the "prestige" and low hours.
Poet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Drakoi wrote: |
only a fool would accept 2.0 |
Such fools are known to exist in Korea to drive wages down, and oftentimes, they go by the name of "Canadian." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok hellofaniceguy,
if 2.0 is foolish...what is reasonable for a newbie teacher with no experience?
Oh and don't forget to factor in free airfare, almost free accomodations in your equation of what is not foolish. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't say 2.0 was foolish...I posted that 1.7 was.
Sure...airfare, housing, etc. are all perks of the job. But 1.7...
Schools pay basically the same pay to newbies or experienced teachers.
But why would anyone agree to it? Why are you working? For money!
What it a decent wage? That's a subjective impression.
But accepting or agreeing to a low wage is preventable by the mere exercise of personal responsibility.
Just because the school says..."that's the going rate does not mean it has to be so."
Schools say.."we have no students or are on hard times, etc...OK then...when you pick up a few more students...increase my salary. But the school won't."
And when it comes time for renewal...the owner "forgets" that you sweated and worked for a low wage for the year but just the same...will hire another teacher for the same pay and let you go!"
It's all about the MONEY!
Housing for free? Schools are not out of housing money...they pay it, the rent, up front in most cases and get the money back when you leave.
Some teachers are making 2.5 and up. But...they have the gift of gab and know how to play the ESL game in korea!
1.7 is fine...for 3/4 classes a day. Not 120 a month!
Not all hakwon owners are evil...hey...they just want to make a buck at your expense.
I would never agree to split shifts, shared housing or teaching over 5 classes a day at a hakwon for 1.7.
Even though the exchange rate is better...going from Won to dollars...it won't stay that way for very long.
1.7 is what? 1500-1600 US dollars a month? But you are not saving that much. Food, phone, transportation, clothes, etc.
If the school has around 150 students....usually 1 FT's and 2 Kt's depending on the schedule and each student is paying 150.000 Won a month...figure it out! The school is NOT hurting. It does not matter what other bills they have to pay or personal obligations, etc... The school will soon enough pay off their debts and have lots of cash. But...will they pay decent wages? Not if teachers sign for less.
I know a few schools who have 500 plus students! And teachers agree to 1.8 teaching 7/8/9 classes a day!! And they hate it! Well I tell them...why did you agree?
It's all about getting the best deal for yourself and if you are happy with it...who am I to say anything.
But...when teachers sign for low wages...it hurts ALL FT's because schools KNOW that someone will sign a contract for slave wages. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yaya wrote: |
Drakoi wrote: |
only a fool would accept 2.0 |
Such fools are known to exist in Korea to drive wages down, and oftentimes, they go by the name of "Canadian." |
The rest of the time they go by the name of "kyopo" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chronicpride

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hellofaniceguy wrote: |
I just checked out the first 12 jobs on this site and only one was starting at 1.7. All the others are 2.0 and up.
1.7? A fool would agree to that. |
The 1.7 stuff is often being picked up by unmarketable 50 yr olds. You have no idea how many 40yr old+ people are applying here. In fact, it's the largest demographic of resumes that apply here (based on the resumes that I would get when I used to advertise jobs on Dave's). A lot are not picky. Also, salary might take a backseat for some that place a higher value in other aspects of a contract (accommodation, sponsorship, medical, etc...), and have money back home. Ie., the older demographic.
I know some older folks who came here and are flat-ass broke, due to all sorts of reasons. Divorce, gambling/drinking habits, whatever. But I also have met some career teachers who have pensions and nice nest eggs back home, and don't give a hoot over salary, but would place a higher value on other compensation caveats, than the younger ones would.
Different strokes. The younger types often value the salary more, because we have debts or saving/investing needs. The older people who come here who don't have the same financial needs/wants and are happy for 1.7, if there are other aspects that they want, are not fools. Nor are the Kyopos, who often will take anything, because of their unmarketability. They are just looking after their best interests. However, they are foolish for not realizing that this drives salaries down for the rest of us. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MixtecaMike

Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Location: 3rd Largest Train Station in Korea
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
chronicpride wrote: |
They are just looking after their best interests. However, they are foolish for not realizing that this drives salaries down for the rest of us. |
So oldies like myself and Kyopos should not accept a job that may be fine for us because it drives down salaries for the rest of you?
Sorry, when I passed 40 I decided to look out for my own and my family's interests first.
Just kidding, but as a newbie here in Korea I took a job based on my own needs, and seriously doubt I affected anyone else's pay as all the teachers at my school get the same, as far as I know.
Supply and demand, if you want to be paid more then make yourself worth more. I'm currently working on that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Yaya wrote: |
Drakoi wrote: |
only a fool would accept 2.0 |
Such fools are known to exist in Korea to drive wages down, and oftentimes, they go by the name of "Canadian." |
The rest of the time they go by the name of "kyopo" |
Misinformed, aren't we, Urban Myth? Most kyopos can make more money than the non-Korean teacher, particularly if they speak Korean (wow, isn't that thought!).
I've heard the complaint from not just Americans but from other Canucks as well, that yes, Canucks, considering they are a dime a dozen like Mexicans in California, do drive the wages down. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|