View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
saharzie

Joined: 22 Jan 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is SNU Really Below the World's Top 100 Universities?
On Shanghai Jiao Tong University's list of the world's most famous 500 universities, SNU ranked within the 153-201 group. Yonsei University barely scraped the 300-or-over group, while KAIST, Pohang University of Science and Technology and Sungkyunkwan University ranked lower than 400. Hanyang University, Korea University and Kyungbuk University fared even worse at being placed below 500.
In contrast, five Japanese universities were listed in the top 100, with Tokyo University coming in at 14.
In The Times of Britain's list of 200 most famous institutes in the world, ...SNU stood at 119 based on these criteria, after being poorly assessed for having a low degree of research influence (141), a low ratio of students to professors (138) and a dismal ratio of foreign professors (169). However, it fared better in terms of peer reviews (63) and the ratio of foreign students (76).
by Yang Kun-man, Chosun Ilbo (December 3, 2004)
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200412/200412030031.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've never met a Korean who mentioned the education system here who said it was good.
Koreans are very aware their education system has serious problems.
I always say it's because they have such low-taxation rates. How can a government run a decent education system when the average earner is taxed around 4%!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
eamo wrote: |
I always say it's because they have such low-taxation rates. How can a government run a decent education system when the average earner is taxed around 4%!! |
Income tax is silly. Consumption taxes is where line should be drawn. Of note: Korea's consumption taxes are well about 4%. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gord wrote: |
eamo wrote: |
I always say it's because they have such low-taxation rates. How can a government run a decent education system when the average earner is taxed around 4%!! |
Income tax is silly. Consumption taxes is where line should be drawn. Of note: Korea's consumption taxes are well about 4%. |
Still not enough apparently to implement the changes everybody agrees is needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
everybody agrees? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of the reason for SNU's poor showing was a lack of a peer review and substantial research originating there. If I'm in a class with a professor who isn't a good lecturer and, frankly, doesn't care about teaching but does great research, well, I can live with that. One frequent complaint I've heard from Korean uni students, though, is that their professors do neither. They do what they have to in order to get their positions, but after that they - by and large - simply bask in the glow of their status. I can't imagine a professor doing that and surviving at those top 100 schools. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hyalucent

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: British North America
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Real Reality wrote: |
everybody agrees? |
Like I said. I've yet to meet a Korean who thinks their education system is good. They've all said, or implied, t needs radical changes |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
eamo,
But, it seems difficult to get agreement on the details. (What and how?) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThePoet
Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: No longer in Korea - just lurking here
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, shucks,
People are gleefully pointing out how poorly SNU is doing...and I took a look and then I noticed that in Canada, only McGill, UofT and UBC scored higher than SNU...and my home U of Eh...er...A was much farther below. in fact...it was below Pohang! I DEMAND A RECOUNT!!!!!!!! The U of A is even below Tasmania University...I didn't know Tasmania even had grade school (humor folks, just humor, move along, nothing to see here).
Not to mention UC-Davis and Arizona being rated even further below that...and I think they must be whacked. It's making me not take any stock in "expert opinions"
Poet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Real Reality wrote: |
eamo,
But, it seems difficult to get agreement on the details. (What and how?) |
Well, of course! I'm not talking to Koreans at that length about the education system. I think some said class size was a big problem.
My g/f says it's about too much a focus on exams. Learning is secondary to memorizing for exams that reward simply memorizing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
J.B. Clamence

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's funny. I've heard SNU referred to as the Harvard of Korea, only to find out that in the rankings, it tied with the University of Virginia.
However, I do find these rankings to be all out of wack. Two of the key factors are international students and international faculty. How can you judge a university based on how many foreigners they have there? What if most of them are a bunch of rich kids whose parents sent them to America to study, but they couldn't get into a good school, so they had to go to a crappy school instead? All SNU has to do is get a bunch of morons from abroad and voila -- they'll be #1 next year. That doesn't make sense.
How can you explain the University of Texas--Austin getting #15, above Columbia and Cornell. No way! Ditto for UC-San Diego and UC-San Francisco both getting ranked higher than UCLA. Again, no way! This list is bogus. I call BS! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
J.B. Clamence wrote: |
How can you explain the University of Texas--Austin getting #15, above Columbia and Cornell. No way! |
UT-Austin has been doing some good work in the past ten years, in the areas of literature and literary criticism, for example. Last I knew Gayatri Spivak was based there. Here's to the big state universities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|