View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dr. Buck

Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Land of the Morning Clam
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:55 pm Post subject: Somebody Shoot This Guy |
|
|
Here's an article from today's funny pages:
Among a number of Korean parents, enrolling their children in advanced (and expensive) English speaking and listening classes is not an option but a must. But do they work?
For Song Soon-ho, who has published his sixth English study book titled "We Can Speak English Better than Americans," the answer is resounding "No."
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2004/12/13/200412130043.asp |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He suggests that Korean kindergarten children should not be studying from complicated history or biology text books when they can't even master the english in fairy tales.
You suggest shooting him.
Please explain the connection. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr. Buck

Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Land of the Morning Clam
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess the bold type didn't catch your eye. The title of his book implies that Korean ESL students can speak better than Americans.
So, yes, shoot him. For his absurdness and greed. And boot him in the ass. Right where his head is located. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
riverboy
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you should chill out buck. I read the it and I thought he had some excellent points. The korean mathod of teaching English is very poor and this guy is suggesting that a more traditional method of teaching through fairytales is more effective than the present method. I agree with the guy.
Have you every heard the saying "you can't judge a book..."
Oh never mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr. Buck wrote: |
I guess the bold type didn't catch your eye. The title of his book implies that Korean ESL students can speak better than Americans.
So, yes, shoot him. For his absurdness and greed. And boot him in the ass. Right where his head is located. |
I guess the bold type caught my eye, but then I read the rest of the article.
absurdness and greed- pfff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Merlyn
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Strange title considering his view of esl students, "The reading ability of Korean college graduates is similar to that of American students in their second elementary school year" Trying to sell the book though. I would agree with him that most students are studying far above there level and should take a step back. Would I recommend fairy tales though? No. They should just try learning the basic phrases and actually try to practice what they've learned in the books. They don't practice it, don't study, and so don't learn. You can give them fairy tales as well, and I'm sure they won't read them. They have to try. It is as simple as that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems to me he's on the right track. If Korean English education ever gets on track tho' we could all be out of jobs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read the full article and Mr. Song is spot-on!
In my view, he has identified exactly why English-ability of Koreans is so poor considering how much money they spend on it.
Koreans always try to 'level-up'. Go for broke. They do merciless intensive courses. Choose the hardest book on the shelf. They think if they work super-hard they can cope with a level well above their actual level.
And Hagwons pander to this fallacy. Sell the student whatever they want!! Never tell a student they should use an easier book in an easier level. They'll walk away!
Quote: |
Song's antidote to parent's obsession with their children studying advanced-level English speaking and listening materials: go back to basics, especially basic-level reading like fairy tales. |
Yes! It's so true. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
We Can Speak English Better than Americans |
I think there are two ways in which the word "can" is commonly used.
1. To mean that we are able to do something at the present time. Eg. a university student says "I can do long division".
2. To mean that our present ability will allow us to do something in the future, after other steps have been taken. Eg. A mother tells her 10-year old daughter "You can be a doctor or a lawyer".
I suspect that the writer of that book was using the word with the second meaning in mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
J.B. Clamence

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
riverboy wrote: |
Have you every heard the saying "you can't judge a book..." |
Indeed. Based on some things he said in the article, it's possible that the title is a tongue-in-cheek parody of a certain mindset. We shouldn't assume that he really believes that until we see the actual book. After all, it would be quite easy for an outsider to misjudge Swift's "A Modest Proposal." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
riverboy
Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 8:59 pm Post subject: A Modest Proposal |
|
|
There was nothing modest about it.
I do agree with his approach. I think the title is a form of encouragement. I have a lot of success teaching conversaiton through literature. It takes a bit more time, but in the long run, the student is more well rounded and can study on their own without the need of a teacher to help them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, we shouldn't jump to hasty conclusions about what the author might have intended by that title (we can = "we have the potential to"? we can = "we are currently able to"?). Instead, we should concern ourselves with a calm, cool, scholarly analysis of the content of his book, his observations, the conclusions he draws from them, and so forth.
Had he titled his book "We Can Speak English Better than Britons", I'd shoot him, of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
turtlepi1

Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JongnoGuru wrote: |
Had he titled his book "We Can Speak English Better than Britons", I'd shoot him, of course. |
Yeah.. because we all love taking our Ca(r) to the Ba(r).
()=silent
Betcha wish you could wrap a set of () around me  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to speak to the guy's comments about reading books at the appropriate level.
What's more useful to a student learning to read: Reading lots of books at his/her reading level and getting the repetition of well constructed sentences?
Or: slogging through a book slowly and looking up word after word after word just so you can get the gist of the meaning?
I think the answer is self-evident.
I don't necessarily agree that fairy tales alone would be the recommended choice of reading material. There is a lot of high quality children's literature out there. A good librarian could easily find the intended reading level for books.
At the moment, I can't recall the series title of the lit books we used in junior high/high school, but there are quite a few of them from different companies. They would be an excellent place to start looking. They have already been arranged by reading level. They are full of short stories or excerpts chosen for variety and interest as well as reading level. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chiaa
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
matthewwoodford wrote: |
Seems to me he's on the right track. If Korean English education ever gets on track tho' we could all be out of jobs. |
I agree with you 100%.
In addition....
Converstaion classes are a bunch of BS, if a kid cannot even write down a simple SVO sentence in ANY verb tense. Once a kid can form the basic things, then conversation classes are good.
The problem is that the Korean education system seem to tell students material instead of teaching it to them. That is why I was always more successful than my fellow Korean teachers in teaching basic grammer which is 100% necessary in order to learn to speak a foreign language (please notice I said basic). They were explaining it to the kids in Korean and I used English and my 15 Korean words. Granted that most Korean Hogwan teachers are not certified teachers, but I should have seen one or two of them over the years who are just "natural teachers" ie good at explaining things so people can understand.
I have always firmly believed that at some point in the history of English education in Korea, people perhaps subconsciously realized that Korean teachers, even if fluent in that language they were teaching, could not teach a language for nothing. So they brought in foreign teachers in to do it and justified it as "converstion classes". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|