|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:16 pm Post subject: What a English major really is? |
|
|
It seems that Koreans in the position to hire consider those with a BA in English to be somewhat more qualified than those in possession of various other BA's. This is according to my occasional browsing through the various job boards and classified ads, plus the favorable response I got from directors back during my Hagwon days (I have a BA in English. Lucky me).
However, as an alumni from the California State University system, I can say that at least in my experience, the curriculum covered in my undergraduate studies in no way touched upon the English language in the grammatical sense. (Courses that were even remotely related I guess would be History of the English Language, Creative Writing, Literary Criticism).
Anyway, English degrees as I know it are very literary based, with both American, British, other European, modern, 19th, poetry, etc... Now, unless we are teaching Disintegration of Self in Poe's Short Stories, or something like that, I don't see the upper hand we would have in basic conversation skills and teaching.
My question, although I already imagine its true, is "Do most Koreans in the position to hire, at any level, see the major in English and assume we are better equiped for the job here at hand." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
turtlepi1

Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They see you as easily marketed to the hagwon mothers.
(after all isn't that what is most important?)
I had this same pondering myself but as I don't have a BA in English felt I would have gone down in flames if I posed the question.
In Canada I think you need to take English composition and English Lit. in any discipline. Generally speaking they are the courses that "might" help you in a hagwon situation. (Still not grammer intenstive by any means.)
Granted us science types write papers that are better suited to passive voice, but I would suggest we do as much writing (and reading) as the BA crowd.
A degree in applied linguistics should give someone a step up. So too should teacher training, or a CELTA or DELTA, but the BA in English is an easy sell when a hagwon mom (exactly the same as a Canadian rink mom BTW) asks if the teachers are "qualified".
I teach the momma's class and they love me now but when they heard my degree was a BSc (computers) they were a little skeptical. Of course my winning personality and 7 years teaching experience won them over )
Now they hear I am leaving to be a "professor" in the Middle East and they are talking about how "lucky" their children were to have a chance to study with me.
*sigh* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PolyChronic Time Girl

Joined: 15 Dec 2004 Location: Korea Exited
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, I'm Cal State too! Where did you go? I'm from Fullerton.
You're right that the undergrad didn't touch too much upon grammatical and linguistics...I think I took one course and struggled a bit (them dang sentence diagrams )
On the defense of my school, what I love about the Cals State system is that even in my undergrad, I had qualified Ph.D professors and developed a close rapport with them....that's better than being in a class of 100 students and being taught by some grad student.
But I'm more of a literature-head than an ESL teacher...so I'm going back to finish my Master's and get into the teaching that I actually like. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From my experience they seem so clueless it wouldn't matter. If you have a degree in computer science from a community college they think you're qualified to jump into a classroom and teach little children, or even develop the course yourself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zenpickle
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Location: Anyang -- Bisan
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. None of my English courses taught grammar. I don't remember any English courses in the course lists teaching grammer.
On the other hand, as Communications majors, we all had to take two rigorous grammar courses in order to graduate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What a English major really is? |
Quick! Where the hell is that "flame a newbie" thread when you really need it!?!
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shouldn't that be "What AN English major really is?", n'est pas?
Grammar isn't exactly calculus. Any North American school system should be able to teach a kid everything he/she needs to know about grammar in k-12. Ideally, you shouldn't have to teach it at the university level for any discipline. If someone is going major in English, one would doubly think that person has a firm grasp of grammar.
It's like a computer science BS degree would assume the first year student has completed a year of calculus, geometry, and functions/relations at the high school level. You're not supposed to be still struggling with BEDMAS if you're taking any science degree.
I personally found, as arts editor at my university newspaper, that the worst writers were English and Communications majors, notably the J-school track types. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know at my university, an English comp course is mandatory for everyone. and when I was an RA, I spent a lot of time proofreading papers from that course, and trust me- gramar counted for a lot. One of the most useful things I brought to Korea was the composition guide book. The English majors had to take intensive courses in gramar, and the continous compositions and the continued attention to grammar had to do something to us.
I think that majoring in a foreign language is undervalued here among parents. I know that my own experiences studying French and German, as well as Korean have had a big affect on how I teach. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinks

Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Location: Formerly: Lower North Island
|
Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
Shouldn't that be "What AN English major really is?" |
The whole sentence is pretty clumsy, regardless of the a/an typo.
Does it mean 'what is an English major, really?' or is it meant to be saying 'this is what an English major really is'?
I get the drift, but the exact meaning is debatable.
EDIT: I realise that the op probably typed off the top of his/her head and if s/he had thought about it for a moment the end result would have been clearer.
TIP: Write subject lines after you have written your message. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Jinks- Go ***** ********
Last edited by HapKi on Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
HapKi wrote: |
Hey Jinks- Go screw yourself |
Now, normally I'm on the side of cutting people slack re grammar and spelling on a message board, but dude, you gotta admit, when you propose a topic asking for serious discussion of the merits (supposed or otherwise) of having a degree with an English major - well, honestly, you're leaving yourself wide open to spitwads from the peanut gallery when commit typos in the very title of the thread ... you kow?
(Check your anger, take responsibility for what's yours, then hit the "edit" button the OP and see if you can clean it up a little.)
Quote: |
as an alumni from the California State University system, I can say that at least in my experience, the curriculum covered in my undergraduate studies in no way touched upon the English language in the grammatical sense |
Yeah, I studied in the English dept at one of the UCs, and there wasn't much grammar instruction, a course on Chomsky that still has my head swimming but not worth a lot in the classroom - but there was a lot of writing, term papers and such. Writing has always been pretty easy for me, and the first bit of teaching I did was tutoring other students who don't have the same knack.
It was actually after I started teaching that I started learning grammar rules, and I think the fact that I had to teach it to myself before going in the classroom made the material fresher and more interesting for the students as well. At my first real teaching job I took over the highest advanced level grammar course because no one else wanted to teach it - my guess is that since it dealt with a lot of the things native speakers themselves are not clear on, no one wanted to be faced with young Japanese students who understood the material better than they did. I think the students found my class interesting because I had a lot of energy invested in the learning of it as we went along, kind of a cooperative venture, though of course they didn't know that.
For a short while I felt like a charlatan, teaching with an air of authority things which I had never myself been taught - but I realized that the ability to learn was something I had brought away from my uni experience, and having that ability was what gave me insight on how to organize and present it in a way to make it easier for the students to learn.
Now, that can be said about a lot of other majors as well - I especially agree with peppermint that her background in foreign language learning was probably immensely qualifying for her own work now teaching EFL. How about people with degrees in the physical sciences, though? That's a case-by-case thing, I think. I'm not convinced that there's much about a Geology Degree that prepares someone to teach ESL, though I've met several with such degrees who are good at their work. They have a knack for teaching, I guess you could say, or they worked at how to develop it.
But turtlepi is probably on the nose when he says the main thing is it might make you more marketable at some schools, not so relevant as to how well you can do it - as with most careers, you learn how to do it after you begin doing it, I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blind Willie
Joined: 05 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
HapKi wrote: |
Hey Jinks- Go screw yourself |
If everyone here who needed to screw themselves did so, no one would leave their houses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blind Willie wrote: |
HapKi wrote: |
Hey Jinks- Go screw yourself |
If everyone here who needed to screw themselves did so, no one would leave their houses. |
Can't speak for others, of course, but hey, The Bobster never leaves the house any more ... damn cold out there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinks

Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Location: Formerly: Lower North Island
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HapKi wrote: |
Hey Jinks- Go screw yourself |
Who rattled your cage?
You were the one that brought the subject up, and I just joined in the conversation. My point was [following mindmetoo and bulsajo's comments about your ungrammatical thread title] NOT that you are an illiterate English major; but rather, dashing off messages without previewing or editing your own text leads to sloppy, unclear writing.
Sorry you're such a sensitive type, and sorry I rattled you.
I am not in the game of picking up on every typo, spelling or grammar error [there just isn't enough time], but you must admit that your comments about grammatical writing and English majors do conflict with the ungrammatical structure of your thread title.
If you can't handle the sniggering - don't post!
I cut you plenty of slack observing that the a/an error was a typo rather than a grammar mistake and I pointed out that if you had edited or previewed your post you would have probably written it differently. Telling me to go and screw myself is not adding much to the debate [see my sig!] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
Shouldn't that be "What AN English major really is?", n'est pas?
Grammar isn't exactly calculus. Any North American school system should be able to teach a kid everything he/she needs to know about grammar in k-12. Ideally, you shouldn't have to teach it at the university level for any discipline. If someone is going major in English, one would doubly think that person has a firm grasp of grammar.
It's like a computer science BS degree would assume the first year student has completed a year of calculus, geometry, and functions/relations at the high school level. You're not supposed to be still struggling with BEDMAS if you're taking any science degree.
I personally found, as arts editor at my university newspaper, that the worst writers were English and Communications majors, notably the J-school track types. |
From working as a TA I would say it's Communications and Business School (or prospective Business School students - even worse), but there are some English majors who are really horrendous writers, too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|