|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:23 am Post subject: TOEFL writing |
|
|
Does anyone know how the writing portion of the TOEFL exam is scored? Do they base it more on content or the use of correct grammar? I've searched the internet, but only come up with the practice questions, NOT how they're scored.
Any help would be appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canadian_in_korea
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, I'm not sure about TOEFL but I do know how the CANTEST (canada test for students wanting to go to university....not accepted by all universities i think....but it might give you a general idea/direction)...I hope this helps a little..
[5+] Fluent User. Consistently effective, fully operational command of the language in demanding familiar and unfamiliar contexts of language use, with full comprehension. No language problems that would impede academic success. An exceptional score awarded when a candidate exceeds the minimum for Band 5 in all skills tested.
[5] Very Good User. Very good command of the language in most demanding contexts of language use, especially in area of expertise, with a high degree of comprehension. Only occasional unsystematic inaccuracies and inappropriacies in communication, with misunderstandings in some unfamiliar situations, which very rarely impede communication. Level of proficiency considered adequate for full time academic study.
[4] Competent User. Generally effective command of the language in fairly demanding contexts, especially in area of expertise, with a satisfactory level of comprehension. Some inaccuracies, inappropriacies and misunderstandings in less familiar contexts with more complex language. This level of proficiency in a skill area indicates some weaknesses, which sometimes impede communication, and could affect performance in an academic program. Additional language training would be helpful to improve overall speed and accuracy.
[3] Limited User. Fair command of the language only in moderately demanding language contexts or in interactions with a sympathetic speaker, with limited comprehension. Markedly reduced effectiveness in demanding or unfamiliar situations. The number of systematic inaccuracies and misunderstandings significantly impedes communication and comprehension. Definitely requires additional language training before being considered for academic placement.
[2] Very Basic User. Some ability to function in highly contextualized, familiar situations, but no real command of the language. Frequent systematic errors and misunderstandings seriously impede communication, leading to frequent breakdowns in communication.
[1] Novice. Extremely limited command of the language, with the user limited to handling basic communicative needs.
keep in mind that if the essay is not completed in the given time....there is an automatic .5 reduction. Hope it helps a little... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Derrek
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Go to a bookstore and you'll find your answers.
Some of the new books were pushed fast and filled with errors, though... be warned.
It does give you a good idea of what the test is like, though.
You can find the information online, I know. Check google. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks canadian_in_korea. I'll be teaching a TOEIC writing class this semester and I want to know if I should focus my teaching more on the grammar or more on the content. Looks like I have to do a bunch of both!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chances are you'll have to start with structure. From what I was told, Koreans aren't taught how to write a basic five paragraph essay, even in Korean! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Henry
Joined: 24 Sep 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good question, and I don't know.
What I do know is all of the standardized American placement exams I took didn't give a rat's ass about the content. As long as it generally addressed the issue, you could say whatever you wanted to. What they looked for was stuff like thesis statement in first paragraph, each paragraph supporting the thesis with example, etc., correct punctuation, etc.
Extraneous random stuff was bad, as I recall.
But I'm clueless about tefol. Would be nice to know tho. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zenpickle
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Location: Anyang -- Bisan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I concentrate on the big three:
1. Grammar
2. Structure
3. Content
The first thing I do, though, is have many class discussions and readings to help the kids figure out what their opinions are. You can't write argumentative essays without opinions, and most students haven't figured out what their opinions are yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scott in HK
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: now in Incheon..haven't changed my name yet
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You may want to focus more on structure and content than grammar not because the grammar part is not important, but rather that it is so hard to change.
I taught writing courses in HK to students taking their uni entrance exam. 500 word essay in 75 mins. Over the course of the year, it was hard for the students to change their grammar habits. Extra lessons, empty red pens, mini lessons...everything I did had little impact on their basic grammar mistakes as everything had been so fossilized. So I switch tactics and taught them strucutre and content. It was with this approach that I finally saw their writing marks start to improve.
Peppermint is right. They probably have no idea how to structure an essay. Once you get them writing proper essays with decent content then go back and start to work on the grammar.
The one thing I continued to do was to focus on one grammar point per essay. "Today class we are going to try to get our subject -verb agreement right. So check every verb and subject before you hand your paper in."
Putting 'five paragraph essay' into a browser will bring up a wealth of info about writing... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the help and advice. I've been teaching writing for some time now and have picked up a few tricks to break through that "fossilized" grammar. I realized that ME correcting their errors was worthless. They took a look...said "Oh, yeah...that's right" and made the same mistake the next time. What I do now is tell them what KIND of mistake they made (V for verb, A for article, Sp for spelling) and have THEM correct the mistakes in the back of their notebook under the proper heading. After writitng (they must write the error AND the correction in the back) "I am student. I am A student" and the like 25 times, the NEXT time they write a sentence, they start to think "Oh! I need to put an article here or I'll have to write it again!"
I'll continue to do this and add your suggestions to the syllabus...especially the brainstorming, thesis sentence writing, and how to write supporting paragraphs.
Thanks again! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scott in HK wrote: |
You may want to focus more on structure and content than grammar not because the grammar part is not important, but rather that it is so hard to change.
I taught writing courses in HK to students taking their uni entrance exam. 500 word essay in 75 mins. Over the course of the year, it was hard for the students to change their grammar habits. Extra lessons, empty red pens, mini lessons...everything I did had little impact on their basic grammar mistakes as everything had been so fossilized. So I switch tactics and taught them strucutre and content. It was with this approach that I finally saw their writing marks start to improve.
Peppermint is right. They probably have no idea how to structure an essay. Once you get them writing proper essays with decent content then go back and start to work on the grammar.
The one thing I continued to do was to focus on one grammar point per essay. "Today class we are going to try to get our subject -verb agreement right. So check every verb and subject before you hand your paper in."
Putting 'five paragraph essay' into a browser will bring up a wealth of info about writing... |
This is all sound advice.
ajuma wrote: |
Thanks for the help and advice. I've been teaching writing for some time now and have picked up a few tricks to break through that "fossilized" grammar. I realized that ME correcting their errors was worthless. They took a look...said "Oh, yeah...that's right" and made the same mistake the next time. What I do now is tell them what KIND of mistake they made (V for verb, A for article, Sp for spelling) and have THEM correct the mistakes in the back of their notebook under the proper heading. After writitng (they must write the error AND the correction in the back) "I am student. I am A student" and the like 25 times, the NEXT time they write a sentence, they start to think "Oh! I need to put an article here or I'll have to write it again!" |
Man, that'd be a great idea, if I had the time to squeeze it in.
-----
As far as TOEFL scores go, it's on a range from 0-6. The Longman Intro/Complete TOEFL books give pretty good explanations about this, though I don't agree with two of their sample essays in those books. I also have a handout that gives a more detailed explanation of what is expected of them, and use that as a quick guide.
The TOEFL scorers most likely grade on a holistic basis, considering that there's more than likely a large number of essays being given to each scorer. If it's anything like the NCS Pearson system, one reader will read and score it, then it will be given to another reader who doesn't know the first reader's score, and then, if there's a large discrepancy, they'll pass it on to a supervisor for more detailed scoring. Grammar is important, but it really only comes into play when you're debating between whether it's one score or the other. The better the writer, the more natural their grammar becomes.
I'll give a brief explanation of the scoring system. If you want the in-depth one, I could copy it on here while I'm at work later.
6-Good (not perfect) grammar and a strong grasp of essay writing as a whole. No organization problems. Lots of support and examples. They understood the question and answered it competently. It will NOT be exactly like what a native speaker would write, but it will be pretty close.
5-Solid grammar and a solid essay. Similar to a 6, but more likely to have less examples/more generalizations. Otherwise, also a good essay.
4-Not enough support. Thesis might be okay, but not perfect. Grammar problems will be more prominent, but the essay will still be quite legible. Either the intro or conclusion may be weak, but not both. May only have one support paragraph instead of 2 or 3.
3-The student knows how to write the skeleton of an essay, but their writing ability is pretty low. Very few examples in the body. Both the intro and conclusion are pretty weak, in that the broader idea is not introduced, and the conclusion doesn't really conclude in so much as restate the opinion and say "What I said is why". The essay may be difficult to read in certain sections.
2-The student has some organizational problems, or extremely weak grammar, but they may have had some explanations which bump it up from a 1. The intro and conclusion typically are one sentence. Generally difficult to read.
1-The student wrote a paragraph or several sentences. Very disorganized and extremely difficult to understand. Only one example given.
0-The student did not attempt the essay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Zyzyfer!! That's a help!! Could you PM me with the finer details? This will give me a base for where to start with them.
As far as the students doing their own correcting goes...it's a lot LESS work for me when I only have to tell them the KIND of mistake, instead of having to correct every word. (Much easier to write "V" than cross out "swimmed" and write "swam".) I also use a * next to some of the errors for the more complex problems. I spend about 10-15 minutes at the beginning of each class going from student to student to help with questions or problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fandeath

Joined: 01 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't mind the in-depth version. How big is it?
Please post it here or PM me. Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll post it up here tomorrow. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
christinajou
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:37 pm Post subject: Scoring scale |
|
|
They have a range of scores from 6 to 0. You need to take all content, structure, coherency, etc. into account. It's like a regular essay.
6- (shows consistent proficieny)
well organized, addresses the topic, included examples ad details, has few grammatical errors and vocbulary
5- (shows inconsistent proficiency)
well organized, addresses the topic, included fewer examples an details, has more errors in grammar and vocabulary
4- (shows minimal proficiency)
adequately organized, addresses most of the topic, inludes some examples and details, has errors in grammar and vocabulary that confuse meaning
3- (shows developing proficiency)
is inadequately organized, addresses part of the topic, includes few examples, has many errors that confuse meaning...
2 - (little proficiency)
disorganized, not address the topic, does not include exmaples, has many errors that consistently confuse meaning...
get the point...i don't think i need to explain 1 and 0. hope this helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Taken straight, word for word, from the sheet that I use.
Score 6
This essay demonstrates a high degree of competence in writing. The essay has a clear thesis that is developed in well-organized paragraphs. Generalizations are supported by clear and persuasive reasoning and by specific details and examples. The writer responds clearly, effectively, and thoughtfully to all aspects (questions) of the writing task (prompt). The sentences are free from all but the most minor errors and have structural variety.
Score 5
This essay demonstrates clear competence in writing. The essay has a clear thesis and generally well-organized and well-developed paragraphs. Generalizations are supported by clear and persuasive reasons and specific details, but the paper may have fewer details than a 6 essay will have. The writer responds effectively and clearly to the writing task while it demonstrates a competent understanding of the prompt. The sentences are free from major grammatical errors and have some degree of structural variety (e.g. subordination).
Score 4
This essay demonstrates basic competence in writing. The essay has a thesis that adequately addresses the topic. The paragraphs are adequately organized and developed with some appropriate details and examples. The writer responds to the writing task but may neglect some aspects of the prompt. The sentences are understandable, but may have grammatical and mechanical errors that occasionally confuse the reader.
Score 3
This essay demonstrates marginal competence in writing. The essay contains a thesis that is not clear, and demonstrates a weak understanding of the function and organization of paragraphs. It lacks specific and relevant development of generalizations, as well as a weak understanding of the prompt. The writer may distort or neglect some aspect(s) of the task. The sentences marked by frequent errors in sentence structure, grammar, and word choice.
Score 2
This essay demonstrates incompetence in writing and will probably be flawed in more than one of these areas: The essay may lack a thesis. The paragraphs are underdeveloped or very poorly organized. The writing may suggest problems with focus or may contain irrelevant details and specifics. The writer may neglect important aspects of the writing task or seem confused about the writing task or passage. Sentences have serious and persistent errors in sentences structure, grammar, and word choice; sentences are often unintelligible.
Score 1
This essay demonstrates an inability to address the writing task. The essay is undeveloped and/or incoherent; it may also have severe and repeated problems in sentence structure, grammar, and word choice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|