|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:18 am Post subject: if you were king of immigration for a day... |
|
|
what would you do?
First up I think that all forms for visas should tell you exactly what paperwork you need and what the rules of the visa are. Then that immigraiton followed them and when they changed em they let everyone know.
Second I'd get rid of the letter of release. Not being able to freely change jobs leads to a lot of abuse of english teachers here.
Third more stringent visa regulations to get your intial teaching visa. I think that a lot of the underbelly of the teaching community that arrives here could be stopped if the requirements were bit tougher. Interviews, references from home countries etc. should be done before people are granted teaching visas.
However once you get an intial visa renewal should be a lot easier if you're staying in country and say changing jobs. Visa runs seem like a pointless waste of time and money IMHO.
The terms of the initail terms of the e2 visas are fair but I think the visa is a good temporary visa and after you've been here say two years you should qualify for a permant residence visa and be free to move out of teaching. Also after two years you should be free to work at other places wihtout having to tell immigration about it. Basically you'd be a korean just without the right to vote. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sadsac
Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: Gwangwang
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with clear cut and concise rules and regs governing visa issuance. I think 5 years and then issued with a 5 year visa, with different rules governing that visa. You could call it an an E2-5. LOR's, a procedure should be established, you neither need one or not, I would abolish it. Immigration should have one foreigner on staff at all offices that deal with foreign nationals. At major centres, Seoul, Busan, Masan, Ulsan, Yoesu and such, a minimum of two native speakers. All documentation should be in Korean on one side and English on the other. Presentation of documents with each job change should cease. All your information is in the system, amend the employment element and issue an extension. Immigration would have teeth. Enforcable laws and any officer found being corrupt, 5 years jail and the individual who offers the bribe or whatever, 7 years and loss of any rights to employ foreign workers for 10 years. Any family member associated with the business would also be included in the ban. Get real and get tough. Every foreign national who applies provides the following documents:
Degree
Passport
Crimminal History ( issued by the necessary authority )
Medical
Traffic history
2 x personal references ( checkable )
1 x business reference ( checkable )
Return air ticket
$1000.00 in a verifiable bank account or credit card
Minimum visa processing time 4 weeks, this is to check the references. Most people will still qualify and those that don't, shouldn't have in the first place. Make it a little tougher initially and then make it simpler to retain.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kalbi
Joined: 27 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:43 am Post subject: King for a Day |
|
|
Also after two years you should be free to work at other places without having to tell immigration about it.
Lemongirl: I agree with most of your suggestions.. however....with reference to the above, I would say, I do not mind 'reporting' to immigration (as opposed to getting their permission), as long as I would no longer need the permission of my employer.
Then Sadsac: I disagree with your suggestion for a medical... unless it is limited to specific listed ailments. For example a medical exam for high blood pressure and AIDS. That way, one's entire medical history would not become public information, while allowing the government to screen for whatever ailment it is they would be screening out. Frankly speaking, I am more concerned about the mental health than the physical health of some of the ESL teachers I have run into here. In any event, how would you standardize medicals? Special designated doctors??
Also sadsac? What would be the point of the 1000$ deposit? I would object to the deposit because many people coming here could not come if that criteria were to be established. However, to the extent it would mean that I could qualify for a cell phone or internet or a credit card or any of these other financial arrangements (up to the limit of my account), then I would be cool with that stipulation.
As King, I would eliminate the need for obtaining re-entry visas.
kalbi |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Harpeau
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
sadsac wrote: |
$1000.00 in a verifiable bank account or credit card
 |
kalbi wrote: |
Also sadsac? What would be the point of the 1000$ deposit?
kalbi |
Hey kalbi, where does he mention anything about a deposit?! He's just making sure you've got some money as a cushion, that's all. I myself would tend to agree with him.
Harpeau |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gollum
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cute guys... but you must realize that the things that seem obvious to us are also obvious to them... they have certain rules in place and won't change them because it leads to more bribe money and more control. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JacktheCat

Joined: 08 May 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As much as we like to bitch about immigration, I wouldn't want their job for all the kimchi in Korea.
Have to work long long hours, low pay, inadequate resources, having to make quotas of foreigners busted, inane requests from the government, having to deal all day with foreigners whose language you don't speak.
No thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Get rid of the Visa Run.
Why does one have to be in another country to be issued a work visa? I could never work it out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paji eh Wong

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Derrek. (am I saying this?)
Turf out a bunch of the adjoshis in upper and middle management, and you a lot of the problems would resolve themselves in the long run. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:34 pm Post subject: Re: if you were king of immigration for a day... |
|
|
CrazyLemonGirl wrote: |
what would you do?
First up I think that all forms for visas should tell you exactly what paperwork you need and what the rules of the visa are. Then that immigraiton followed them and when they changed em they let everyone know. |
You'd think the IO might at least create a webpage for this, listing all documents and rules for each visa category. That would allow them to update info cheaply, easily and instantly whenever the rules/required documents changed.
Yes, it might be nice if these same details were printed on, say, the back of the actual paper application forms. But the website would be real-time, you could print it out (ideally they'd provide rules/documents lists AND printer-ready application forms) and there'd be none of the inevitable "oh, that form is years old -- you can't rely on that one -- where did you dig that up?" snafus. Plus, everyone can get themselves on the Internet in very short notice; whereas, if it's only available in print form, that may entail an additional trip to the IO & back.
CrazyLemonGirl wrote: |
Second I'd get rid of the letter of release. Not being able to freely change jobs leads to a lot of abuse of english teachers here. |
I've never had to deal with Letter of Release rules, so I can't speak from experience. The first I heard of them was in connection with English teaching. (Am I correct in understanding this is only a consideration for teachers?) CLG, as you're doubtless more familiar with the Letter of Release system than I am, how do the pros and cons stack up in your estimation? I'm sure this has been beaten to death in many other threads that I didn't read and probably won't find...what was the consensus of those, if any?
CrazyLemonGirl wrote: |
Third more stringent visa regulations to get your intial teaching visa. I think that a lot of the underbelly of the teaching community that arrives here could be stopped if the requirements were bit tougher. Interviews, references from home countries etc. should be done before people are granted teaching visas. |
So, currently the interviews, reference-checking, etc. all happens after the teaching visa is granted? (I know I make a donkey of myself everytime I post on Job-related, but...)
CrazyLemonGirl wrote: |
However once you get an intial visa renewal should be a lot easier if you're staying in country and say changing jobs. Visa runs seem like a pointless waste of time and money IMHO. |
No argument about that, visa runs do take time and money, and I've had to make a few of those myself. In one memorable case, though, I was permitted to remain in country while switching employers. I don't know how other countries handle that, whether you can for example change employers in the U.S. or Canada without nipping across the border and re-entering. In Korea, simple geography makes that a flight and probably a hotel stay.
Okay, if we're really King/Queen of Immigration, I suppose we'd want everything to go our way. But if you couldn't have everything the way you want it, I wonder how far up your list of priorities this item would be in reality. I mean, sure, I know that some employers are creeps, and a teacher might end up in a job that goes sour, or they're stuck out in some isolated place any of us would hate. But if a foreigner in Korea is job-hopping to the extent that the time & financial costs of visa runs become a hardship... Hmm. Might the end-effect of such costs be to encourage people to exercise more caution and thoroughness before accepting a job offer? Granted, no-one's clairvoyant and the first job is a pig in a poke. But after that, ... Hmm.
CrazyLemonGirl wrote: |
...and after you've been here say two years you should qualify for a permant residence visa and be free to move out of teaching. Also after two years you should be free to work at other places wihtout having to tell immigration about it. Basically you'd be a korean just without the right to vote. |
Okay, I think I'm getting the idea of this thread now! And in that same spirit, here's my Immigration Wish-List:
All teachers granted visas henceforth must be female, have pleasing personalities along with other well-developed assets, they must be very single, not exclusively into Korean guys, totally non-possessive, and they all have to want to live in northern Seoul. Oh yeah, and they gotta be way into Z-grade movies and gardening.
(Hey, I'm King -- my word is law! ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Squid

Joined: 25 Jul 2003 Location: Sunny Anyang
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
1.
To ease labor office workloads draft in a bunch of paralegals to check each contract is consistent with Korean labor law.
2.
Create a more flexible workforce by scrapping the LOR.
3.
Pay me for the positives. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|