Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GOP leader calls for nationalizing the banks

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:41 pm    Post subject: GOP leader calls for nationalizing the banks Reply with quote

Well, not exactly, but he comes close:

Graham: Nationalizing Banks Should Be On The Table

"This idea of nationalizing banks is not comfortable," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). "But I think we've got so many toxic assets spread throughout the banking and financial community, throughout the world, that we're going to have to do something that no one ever envisioned a year ago, no one likes. To me, banking and housing are the root cause of this problem. I'm very much afraid any program to salvage the banks is going to require the government... I would not take off the idea of nationalizing the banks."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/15/graham-nationalizing-bank_n_167048.html

Personally, I say hang the dirty socialist running dog in capitalist-sheep clothing from the nearest lamp post. Oh wait, it's only socialism when a Democrat suggests something.

It gets hard sometimes to figure out when a politician is being honest and when he's playing politics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michaelambling



Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Location: Paradise

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:39 pm    Post subject: Re: GOP leader calls for nationalizing the banks Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Well, not exactly, but he comes close:

Graham: Nationalizing Banks Should Be On The Table

"This idea of nationalizing banks is not comfortable," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). "But I think we've got so many toxic assets spread throughout the banking and financial community, throughout the world, that we're going to have to do something that no one ever envisioned a year ago, no one likes. To me, banking and housing are the root cause of this problem. I'm very much afraid any program to salvage the banks is going to require the government... I would not take off the idea of nationalizing the banks."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/15/graham-nationalizing-bank_n_167048.html

Personally, I say hang the dirty socialist running dog in capitalist-sheep clothing from the nearest lamp post. Oh wait, it's only socialism when a Democrat suggests something.

It gets hard sometimes to figure out when a politician is being honest and when he's playing politics.


Well, isn't a government-regulated banking system socialist? By bailing out the banking system, America has already become a socialist state. This isn't necessarily a bad thing--"socialism" has only been a dirty word sense the belligerence of McCarthy.

What I find most interesting is how the last decade has obliterated the traditional perspectives of the left and right wing. All of a sudden, you have Republicans pushing socialism and democrats wanting to curb government spending. What a weird world we live in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Well, isn't a government-regulated banking system socialist? By bailing out the banking system, America has already become a socialist state.


Aren't you over-stating the case? Socialism as I understand it is the public ownership of the major means of production. I don't equate regulation with ownership.

I'm of the view that I am more free when everyone obeys the laws than I would be if there were no laws at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It wouldn't be a permanent nationalization, but a temp one, along the Swedish example. It is a virtual certainty to happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It is a virtual certainty to happen.


An awful lot of awfully smart people are saying so. Obama says he doesn't want to, that Sweden's case was far simpler than ours. If nothing else, I think he's being smart to go slow on it. If he'd come out immediately and nationalized banks, there would have been hell to pay with the opposition. The screaming would have made Stalin turn over in his grave.

If it has to be done, the smart thing is to be on record as being against it until the opposition publically begs Obama to do it. It will be very hard for them to afterwards paint him as a radical.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
michaelambling



Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Location: Paradise

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Well, isn't a government-regulated banking system socialist? By bailing out the banking system, America has already become a socialist state.


Aren't you over-stating the case? Socialism as I understand it is the public ownership of the major means of production. I don't equate regulation with ownership.

I'm of the view that I am more free when everyone obeys the laws than I would be if there were no laws at all.


You're right--regulation isn't socialism, but the 700 billion dollar bailout was a government stake in the banks--i.e., partial ownership. So, I suppose I misspoke; we now have partially government-owned banks, so we're already on the road to socialism. I, for one, welcome the revolution; Scandinavia proves that socialism works very, very well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They likely won't call it nationalization.

Quote:
"Some clever advocates of nationalization have come up some alternative names, Dan. Some of them include government receivership, and my favorite is preprivatization."

John Hendren, ABC News, Feb 15, 2009
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/02/preprivatization.html

There is no real way to know what to and not to do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
It is a virtual certainty to happen.


An awful lot of awfully smart people are saying so. Obama says he doesn't want to, that Sweden's case was far simpler than ours. If nothing else, I think he's being smart to go slow on it. If he'd come out immediately and nationalized banks, there would have been hell to pay with the opposition. The screaming would have made Stalin turn over in his grave.

If it has to be done, the smart thing is to be on record as being against it until the opposition publically begs Obama to do it. It will be very hard for them to afterwards paint him as a radical.


I don't have any confidence in Obama re: this economic crisis. The stuff he says sounds level-headed at first, but doesn't hold up on examination. Yeah, he's minimally competent, but he seems way out of his league here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why should we and our children and grandchildren pay for the greed and mistakes of today's bankers? Let them go bankrupt and suffer.

We, too, will have to suffer today a bit, too, but it will be much less than our progeny will have to suffer tomorrow. The sooner we start, the sooner we get it over with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
It is a virtual certainty to happen.


An awful lot of awfully smart people are saying so. Obama says he doesn't want to, that Sweden's case was far simpler than ours. If nothing else, I think he's being smart to go slow on it. If he'd come out immediately and nationalized banks, there would have been hell to pay with the opposition. The screaming would have made Stalin turn over in his grave.

If it has to be done, the smart thing is to be on record as being against it until the opposition publically begs Obama to do it. It will be very hard for them to afterwards paint him as a radical.


I don't have any confidence in Obama re: this economic crisis. The stuff he says sounds level-headed at first, but doesn't hold up on examination. Yeah, he's minimally competent, but he seems way out of his league here.


Well monsieur Kuros this financial crisis is way out of any league a US president has had to deal with since the Great Depression.

A fine mess the village idiot left us with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International