View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:06 pm Post subject: House approves stem-cell research |
|
|
http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-0/1116999264166710.xml
Quote: |
Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.) said the harvesting of stem cells for research should not be consumed by the debate over abortion. "To reduce this issue to an abortion issue is the ultimate injustice to people" suffering with diseases, he said. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
In a departure from my conservative leanings I am at odds with Mr Bush's position on stem cell research. Unfortunately, Bush has already signalled that he will veto this bill. In this case religious beliefs are quite clearly interfering in the passage of law. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alias
Joined: 24 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm surprised that it even passed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dogbert
Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alias wrote: |
I'm surprised that it even passed. |
Perhaps some of the legislators voting in favor were given a wake-up call by the scientific progress in stem cell and cloning research being performed in Korea and realized that we cannot afford to fall behind further, Bush and his obstinate ignorance and gut hatred of science be damned. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger Beer
Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
GOOD! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nowhere Man
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 4:31 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Indeed, Dogbert.
Even if he vetoes it, he can only veto American research. The research will go on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the Democrats are politically astute, they will introduce a new stem cell research bill in mid October '06 and another one in mid October '08. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The democrats should have made more political capital out of this in the last election. John Kerry did refer to it in the context of Reeves, but I thought there was a lot more mileage to be extracted from the issue. Dogbert is right, Bush's interest in science doesn't really go beyond the military variety. Fortunately, some republicans support unfettered access to all the tools necessary to carry out effective stem cell research too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
Nowhere Man wrote: |
Indeed, Dogbert.
Even if he vetoes it, he can only veto American research. The research will go on. |
Not even that. It is simply a ban on federal funding. CA passed a bill last november allowing the state gov't to issue a bond for billions of dollars to fund stem cell research. They just chose the HQ (will be in SF). Unfortunately those religous idiots are sueing the state, so the funding is being delayed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dogbert
Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 12:46 am Post subject: Re: ... |
|
|
bucheon bum wrote: |
Nowhere Man wrote: |
Indeed, Dogbert.
Even if he vetoes it, he can only veto American research. The research will go on. |
Not even that. It is simply a ban on federal funding. CA passed a bill last november allowing the state gov't to issue a bond for billions of dollars to fund stem cell research. They just chose the HQ (will be in SF). Unfortunately those religous idiots are sueing the state, so the funding is being delayed. |
I voted for that.
Bush is resolutely anti-science. The man is a throwback.
In addition to his unforgivable opposition to stem-cell research, Bush has, according to columnist Thomas Friedman, cut the National Science Foundation budget by $100 million in 2005 and in 2006 proposes shrinking the Department of Energy science programs and basic and applied research in the Department of Defense.
Friedman quips that Congress caters to people who think "intelligent design" is something done by God and not by Intel. It's funny because it's true. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|