| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
 Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 9:52 pm Post subject: Clinton's fundraiser found not guilty. |
 |
|
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/05/27/state/n104443D18.DTL
I didn't see too many cheers from the right over this one. 
Too bad about all those "dirty Right boys" like DeLay. -snif-
I guess the GOP was thinking about what their own fundraisers do, and then were surprised that the Dems were honest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am happy to hear it. How's that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good on you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
funplanet
Joined: 20 Jun 2003
Location: The new Bucheon!
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| being found "not guilty" does not necessarily mean he isn't "guilty"....he's a Clintonite...hell, he's guilty of something!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Apple Scruff
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| funplanet wrote: |
| being found "not guilty" does not necessarily mean he isn't "guilty"....he's a Clintonite...hell, he's guilty of something!! |
Yeah, he's guilty of exercising good judgement in choosing his causes. Raising money for Bush should be an indictable offense in itself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| funplanet wrote: |
| being found "not guilty" does not necessarily mean he isn't "guilty"....he's a Clintonite...hell, he's guilty of something!! |
Yes, there's a fair and balanced attitude for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
You don't think this is a serious issue for Billary?
I'm sure she's got her eye on it!
Dude, you investigate her campaign, and you investigate her. You can't wipe her name off of it.
|
This is from an older thread on this topic. Derrek wrote that on May 9. Wonder what his take is on the not guilty verdict. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Teufelswacht
Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Location: Land Of The Not Quite Right
|
| Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am not a conservative or a liberal. I have not followed this case. I guess because, in reality, for me, it is a non-issue.
However, from reading the article posted by the OP it appears the guy in the hot seat was considered by the jurors to be stupid instead of guilty. Even the defense agreed the described violations happened. But their defense was that their client was stupid. That is not something I would want to put on my resume:
2000 - 2002: Political fundraiser - Described as stupid by a jury of my peers.
Overall, it appears to be a lot of noise about nothing. Even if numbnuts was convicted it didn't involve ole what's-er-name. So what's the big deal?
Politics - It would be humorous if it wasn't so pathetic. Jeez. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
