View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cthulhu

Joined: 02 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:03 pm Post subject: France's rejection of the new EU constitution |
|
|
France rejects it because they are still living in a 1960's welfare state dreamworld, England will reject it because England doesn't trust Europe (don't blame them) and the Dutch are set to reject it because of--surprise--immigration and security issues along with economic issues. Wots up with the EU? Will can Germany save the day? Probably not. This makes the growing America/Europe divide just a bit more interesting.
France rejects the EU just as England is about the take the presidency of the EU. Coincidence?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If for no other reason, Europe should reject it because the darn thing is 800 pages long. Imagine if it were adopted. You'd need a small pick up truck to bring copies of it into classrooms.
Europe cannot become a viable alternative to the US until it gets itself together. Maybe Brazil can fill the role. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Europe cannot become a viable alternative to the US |
Europe should give up this infantile idea of being an 'alternative' to the US, and go back to being simply a free trade block, not a blueprint for a superstate where the individual nation states would have less sovereignty than Florida. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
funplanet

Joined: 20 Jun 2003 Location: The new Bucheon!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-Ta is right on about the size of the damned thing...a constitution should be a contract between the governed and the government...the EU contract is nothing more than a book of regulations meant to "regulate" every damn aspect of a person's life....from the size of condoms to the hours a store can be open...it is not a true constitution... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And now the Dutch have rejected it emphatically. Looks like it's dead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shakuhachi

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bigverne wrote: |
And now the Dutch have rejected it emphatically. Looks like it's dead. |
A good thing too. The proposed EU is bad for Europe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.suntimes.com/output/osullivan/cst-edt-osul31.html
An interesting article on how these decisive 'no' votes could affect Turkey's chances of joining the EU. Perhaps the main reason for these rejections of the constitution is that EU enlargement has continued apace, with little or no public debate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
From The New Republic Online :
"Far from a statement about Chirac's foreign policies, the main message delivered by voters on Sunday was about the economy. And it was certainly not, as many Americans would have liked, that the French are fed up with excessive regulation, protectionism, and high taxes. Rather, the French no camp seemed to be saying it wanted more protection and regulation, not less. True, Chirac tried to defend the constitution by claiming that it would protect the French from "ultra-liberal Anglo-Saxon" economics. But voters did not believe him, and they wanted an EU constitution that made their preferences explicit. Does anybody really think that free-market reform and the defense of globalization will now become priorities of the French government?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Which shows the absurdity of trying to create a political union out of nations with wildly differing priorities. The French and others want a more social Europe, while the UK and many of the new entrants want a more competitive, deregulated economy. It is impossible to see how these differences can be reconciled. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brento1138
Joined: 17 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 11:39 pm Post subject: Re: France's rejection of the new EU constitution |
|
|
Some random thoughts on the EU...
When I was travelling through Europe in 2003, most of the Europeans I talked to mourned the coming of the EU, but grudgingly admitted it was neccessary to prevent wars and further their economies. Most said the EU helped big business, but not the common person... so I could see protests arising in the near future... in Germany, the EU currency practically doubled the prices of consumer goods, while companies were not forced to increase the wages of the common man. Interesting huh. So imagine, instead of paying 1 dollar for a coke, now, you pay 2 dollars, and your wage is still the same.
The Germans I talked to (young 20-somethings) hated the idea of the EU, since it was never democratically decided... this was in East Berlin, where unemployment is 25%. In Germany, I think it's something like 20%.
Given the opportunity to vote now for a constitution, maybe some people feel they're getting revenge on their governments for this. A lot of Europeans don't like the idea. Hungarians don't like it, and were happy that the Prime Minister said they'd stall implementing the Euro currency...
The homogenization of Europe is not a popular idea there, but one that's grudgingly accepted as a 'we have to do this or else' type thing. But deep down, nobody actually wants it...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting how no one on this board is speaking in favor of the constitution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Interesting how no one on this board is speaking in favor of the constitution.
|
If someone asked you to generalize about the posters at Dave's, how far down the list of adjectives would 'visionary' be? Even on my most optimistic days, I doubt if it would come in under #1,000.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
bucheon bum wrote: |
Interesting how no one on this board is speaking in favor of the constitution. |
P'r'aps 'cos no bugger's read it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
but grudgingly admitted it was neccessary to prevent wars and further their economies. |
People are now starting to see through this propaganda. Increasing trade, economic interdependence and cheap air travel had already created great prosperity and integration in Europe, making the possibility of war highly unlikely. Most Europeans would be quite happy with a common market, and free movement of labour throughout the EU. Enlargement has occured too quickly and with little concern for the interests of the people. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
European union has been a dream since the days of the Romans. For the first time in 15 centuries the chance has come for it to happen peacefully rather than by marching armies.
It's facinating to watch the pull of the dream on one side and the pull of localism, tradition and the past on the other side. It reminds me of what it must have been like in the US of the 1780's before our Constitution.
The choice for Europe really is between an inspiring new political union or a future as a bunch of cute little theme park countries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|