|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Kang is a moron? |
Very much agree |
|
84% |
[ 11 ] |
Agree |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 13 |
|
Author |
Message |
keithinkorea

Joined: 17 Mar 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 7:46 pm Post subject: "Professor" Kang = commie idiot |
|
|
This guy really is a retard.
Quote: |
``Without U.S. intervention, Korea would not have suffered such bloodshed and destruction. To 4 million Koreans killed during the war, the U.S. is not a lifesaver or friend but an enemy,���� Kang said. |
Yep Prof. the North Koreans are the true heroic types on this peninsula aren't they?
If it wasn't for the brave South Korean troops, the US and UN armies all of the peninsula would be starving to death not just the north.
I'm all for freedom of speech, this guy does have the freedom to criticise the US and the south Korean pawns of the imperialist swine. Funny that he abuses that right, if he crtiticised the North he'd be sent to the gulags. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cthulhu

Joined: 02 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He's a moron.
Further to this, who is he exactly and where does he work? He looks vaguely familiar. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
keithinkorea

Joined: 17 Mar 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cthulhu wrote: |
He's a moron.
Further to this, who is he exactly and where does he work? He looks vaguely familiar. |
Sorry I meant to include the link:oops:
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200507/kt2005072819072711960.htm
The moron works at Dongguk University according to the article in the times.
Don know what's going on with that link. Weird.
Last edited by keithinkorea on Thu Jul 28, 2005 8:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alias

Joined: 24 Jan 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
manlyboy

Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The power of myth? Could this guy be espousing views he knows to be untrue in order to help unite the masses against an imaginary threat? You know, kind of like what neo-cons do? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kang is trying to put forth the argument that if the Korean war didn't happen, all would have been well. Basically he goes with the logic that if a nation is left to its own devices, it will naturally develop for the better.
The problem in that though is that the peninsula has not been "left alone" for quite some time. If the US (and that bugger MacArthur) had let the North walk its way through the south, would that have been "natural"?
The North was very early on dictated to by its Soviet big brother. Very few initial actions were carried out without Soviet consent. This really doesn't jive with Kang's theory of self determinative rights making the Korean war just.
If all things were equal AND the Soviets and Americans were both out of the picture (while we're at it, let's take out the Chinese and japanese too), then I would still have to ask... where would the peninsula be today? Would it be like that wonderful world of China or more like Vietnam?
Very few Koreans (south) would trade countries with either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He certainly is a retard of the highest order. I can hardly believe that he is a professor because of his astonishing lack of knowledge with regards to the Korean war. Maybe he hasn't yet had a chance to inspect soviet files that were unsealed after the collapse of communism at the turn of the 90's which prove Stalin gave approval for Kim Il Sung's war plans. He also forgets that the US had withdrawn all of its troops from Korea once the Japanese surrender was secured. But above all else, it is this man's position as a university professor that really shocks me. A man with these extremist (trechorous actually) views should be stripped of his position. Instead, the authorities let him continue working in a position of influence where young naive students who have already studied a highly dubious version of history from elementary school onwards are subject to views completely agreeable with North Korea's propaganda ministry. Bizarre. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's what a columnist at the conservative Chosun Ilbo has to say about Professor Kang and his ilk:
We Boost North Korea's Confidence at Our Peril <i>by Kim Dae-joong</i>
The North Korean regime seems to have gained in self-confidence regarding its relations with South Korea. A recent squabble over taking down a statue of General Douglas MacArthur, a hero of the Korean War to some, and a remark by Prof. Kang Jeong-koo of Dongguk University that the Korean War was fought for "unification�� send a signal the National Liberation forces, hibernating since their suppression by South Korea's anti-Communist forces, are emerging above ground. Amid a climate where leftist or pro-North Korean forces in the Roh Moo-hyun administration have boosted aid to the North and increased the frequency of inter-Korean events while promoting the posthumous award of a medal to a leader of the former Korea Communist Party, the NL forces are at last showing their faces above the parapet to ride anti-American sentiment and a mood of inter-Korean cooperation.
A North Korea expert says the NL, pro-Pyongyang forces that infiltrated campuses and academic circles, have concentrated on education and propaganda since the 1980s democratization movement following a time in hiding under the military regimes. Now, he says, they are reasserting themselves on the back of Seoul��s "sunshine policy" and a new mood of nationalism. Recently, too, a retired general involved in a drive for a veterans body to counter the Korean Veterans Association proudly revealed that his father was a member of the South Worker��s Party of Korea, while a protester at a rally against the MacArthur statute reportedly shouted, "Yes, I'm Red. What are you going to do about it?"
Prof. Kang��s remarks are symbolic of that whole climate. The pro-North Korean forces now have nothing to fear if they come straight out. "The next step will be terror against conservative and rightist forces that goes well beyond bullying," a conservative academic predicts.
North Korea��s new-found confidence is being fueled by moves in the United States, which is fed up with the anti-American sentiment in the South, to deal with Pyongyang directly. The U.S. mainstream was shocked when it heard that Koreans, whom they believe they helped in the hour of need, cite America as the greatest threat to Korea's security.
They did not experience the Korean War, and do not want another war even if it is to thwart a nuclear threat. The anti-Bush camp there say it would be more helpful for the resolution of the nuclear dispute and improvement of human rights in the Stalinist country to engage North Korea directly. That atmosphere is being put to the test in the current round of six-party nuclear talks in Beijing, the Washington Post says. An expert on inter-Korean relations said Pyongyang��s goal at the six-party talks is to have the DPRK fully recognized by the U.S. and other countries.
The U.S. has often been disappointed and dismayed by demands from Seoul that America "restrain" itself on North Korea whenever occasions presented themselves, and by Seoul��s attempt to take the credit for the resumption of the six-country talks. Once South Korea's leftist forces position themselves at the top of the country's political establishment, the Seoul-Washington relationship will slacken further and U.S. influence in Northeast Asia will dwindle. Again, that may motivate the U.S. that trying to resolve the nuclear standoff and the human rights issue through a direct negotiation with the North is more effective than going via a recalcitrant South.
If the Kim Jong-il regime goes on the political offensive against Seoul and Washington by cashing in on these favorable developments, it could put all of South Korea, and its traditional and conservatives forces in particular, in a corner. Their position, it must be said, is not helped by revelations of a clandestine bugging operation by the security agencies and resulting tapes revealing the collusion between big business, the media and politicians.
But it is a fantasy that it would contribute to security on the Korean Peninsula and peaceful coexistence if North Korea took advantage of this mood, as the pro-Pyongyang forces would have us believe. We need only to listen to North Korean defector Kim Tae-san, who said the only way for North Korea to survive its structural food and power shortages ��is eventually to get a hold over all of South Korea -- that is Kim Jong-il��s innermost aspiration." That these developments are taking place even as North Korea��s dismal human rights record and its desperate economic plight and food shortages are exposed to the glare of world attention is one the great historic ironies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dbee
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Location: korea
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with him on one point, a larger nation in general shouldn't step in to 'save' another nation from itself. Don't get involved in other civil wars. I think the stronger side will almost certainly win out eventually, simply because it's more determined and better prepared.
The weaker side will eventually side with the stronger against their erstwhile 'protectors' and start to blame all of their problems on them.
If the koreans wanted communism more than they wanted democracy (which in my estimation they did), then they should have been let to make their own mistakes.
But again, it was a strategic decision made by america, not just for the good of Koreans, but also to stem the worldwide tide of communism and to put a long-term thorn in the side of china. Americans are now reaping the whirlwind of this decision. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dbee wrote: |
I agree with him on one point, a larger nation in general shouldn't step in to 'save' another nation from itself. |
The Russians and the Chinese were already involved in the Korean war attempting to ensure that the many Koreans who didn't want communism were wiped out.
Quote: |
The weaker side will eventually side with the stronger against their erstwhile 'protectors' and start to blame all of their problems on them. |
That's a result of weak governance. Most Yeolin Uri dang voters don't even know that their unification minister is hiding things from them. Irrespective of that, a large percentage of this population is still steadfastly against any negotiation with Pyongyang.
Quote: |
If the koreans wanted communism more than they wanted democracy (which in my estimation they did), then they should have been let to make their own mistakes. |
Korea was distinguishable from Vietnam because many Koreans living in the south staunchly opposed communism unlike the hotbed of support for communism in South Vietnam which undermined attempts to defeat the north in that war. Indeed, without the mass opposition to communism in South Korea the allies might not have been able to push Kim Il Sung back beyond the 38th parallel.
Quote: |
But again, it was a strategic decision made by america, not just for the good of Koreans, but also to stem the worldwide tide of communism and to put a long-term thorn in the side of china. Americans are now reaping the whirlwind of this decision. |
I can see where you are coming from here, but Koreans don't learn anything about their own country's history. They learn about ficticious war heros, golden times that were anything but, and that the Japanese were vicious occupiers when in fact they liberated Korea from slavery. At the turn of the twentieth century Korea was the quintessential failed state as a result of an inability to govern itself. If I learnt an equally ficticous account of history I might be anti-American too. However, the Americans know what really transpired on the Korean penninsula so the Americans shouldn't be reaping any whirlwind. The Americans just took the baton from the Japanese. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dbee
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Location: korea
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The Russians and the Chinese were already involved in the Korean war attempting to ensure that the many Koreans who didn't want communism were wiped out.
|
...untrue, the North Koreans had purchased 70 or so russian made tanks unbeknownst to their southern counterparts. This was declared a key point in their victory by the south korean government afterwards.
... what they didn't tell us was that a large number of 'fortresses' along the DMZ had been all but abandoned when the defence minister granted the troops holidays. Also the government at first declared that they'd make seoul a 'fortress city', but actually fled the city around 4 hours after the announcement and tried to get out of the country as quick as possible.
The chinese 'volunteers' were assembled later, after the americans had invaded and the russians took very little part in the fighting at all.
Quote: |
That's a result of weak governance
|
... governance makes up an essential part of the strength of the people. Just because some of the population were strongly anti-communist doesn't mean that they would have won the war.
Quote: |
Indeed, without the mass opposition to communism in South Korea the allies might not have been able to push Kim Il Sung back beyond the 38th parallel.
|
... completely untrue (as far as I understand it). The north koreans never expected the american to land at incheon. It was completely undefended when they did. This left the whole north korean army completely cut off from their supply lines, with practically no air support. Most of the north korean army were captured after the first big battle between american and north korean forces (around Daegu). From this point on they backpedelled quickly all the way back up to the chinese border.
Quote: |
They learn about ficticious war heros, golden times that were anything but, and that the Japanese were vicious occupiers when in fact they liberated Korea from slavery
|
... all school kids learn a fictious account of their own countries history ... even americans. It takes an adult to dig a little deeper and to compare one sides account to anothers to determine what mostly likely happened. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
dbee wrote: |
...untrue, the North Koreans had purchased 70 or so russian made tanks unbeknownst to their southern counterparts. This was declared a key point in their victory by the south korean government afterwards. |
I think you should read the point you are responding to again,
Quote: |
The Russians and the Chinese were already involved in the Korean war |
Kim Il Sung didn't fight this war alone. His chief sponsor was Stalin and he would have been very reluctant to get involved in this war without an insurance policy which guaranteed Russian and Chinese intervention should the Americans get involved. Stalin's blessing of a North Korean led attack was revealed after the fall of the Soviet Union when previously secret files were unsealed. Aside from the crucial "insurance policy" Stalin's involvement in the Korean war pre US intervention was abundantly clear via the supply of key weaponry. To that extent the Russians were clearly involved, and the Chinese position although perephiral at first clearly constituted a collaberation through the aforementioned "insurance policy." Don't underestimate that, because without it North Korea would probably never have attacked.
Quote: |
The chinese 'volunteers' were assembled later, after the americans had invaded and the russians took very little part in the fighting at all. |
The Chinese intervention took place later when the Americans had pushed Kim Il Sung's troops right back to Baekdu Mountain, but it was crucial in ensuring the Americans couldn't reunify the entire country.
Quote: |
... governance makes up an essential part of the strength of the people. Just because some of the population were strongly anti-communist doesn't mean that they would have won the war. |
I was refering to the government of today whose sunshine policy is almost in sink the noises coming from the North Korean propoganda ministry.
Quote: |
... completely untrue (as far as I understand it). The north koreans never expected the american to land at incheon. It was completely undefended when they did. This left the whole north korean army completely cut off from their supply lines, with practically no air support. Most of the north korean army were captured after the first big battle between american and north korean forces (around Daegu). From this point on they backpedelled quickly all the way back up to the chinese border. |
I don't disagree with any of the above and I haven't read any accounts of history which differ significantly from it but it's not relevant to the point I was making. The Americans could only push the North Koreans back with the help of a huge number of Koreans who didn't want to live in Leninland. Foreign intervention rarely works without a significant degree of domestic support.
Quote: |
... all school kids learn a fictious account of their own countries history ... even americans. It takes an adult to dig a little deeper and to compare one sides account to anothers to determine what mostly likely happened. |
That's true but there are degrees of fiction. Korea takes fiction time to all new levels when it comes to history. Basically, Korea's version of history reads like Harry Potter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:58 am Post subject: Re: "Professor" Kang = commie idiot |
|
|
keithinkorea wrote: |
This guy really is a retard.
Quote: |
``Without U.S. intervention, Korea would not have suffered such bloodshed and destruction. To 4 million Koreans killed during the war, the U.S. is not a lifesaver or friend but an enemy,���� Kang said. |
Yep Prof. the North Koreans are the true heroic types on this peninsula aren't they?
If it wasn't for the brave South Korean troops, the US and UN armies all of the peninsula would be starving to death not just the north.
I'm all for freedom of speech, this guy does have the freedom to criticise the US and the south Korean pawns of the imperialist swine. Funny that he abuses that right, if he crtiticised the North he'd be sent to the gulags. |
Without wishing to support the North Korean regime in any way, it's obviously true that without US intervention the war would have been over quickly and consequently there would have been far fewer casualties. You can't dispute that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
keithinkorea

Joined: 17 Mar 2004
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 11:45 am Post subject: Re: "Professor" Kang = commie idiot |
|
|
matthewwoodford wrote: |
keithinkorea wrote: |
This guy really is a retard.
Quote: |
``Without U.S. intervention, Korea would not have suffered such bloodshed and destruction. To 4 million Koreans killed during the war, the U.S. is not a lifesaver or friend but an enemy,���� Kang said. |
Yep Prof. the North Koreans are the true heroic types on this peninsula aren't they?
If it wasn't for the brave South Korean troops, the US and UN armies all of the peninsula would be starving to death not just the north.
I'm all for freedom of speech, this guy does have the freedom to criticise the US and the south Korean pawns of the imperialist swine. Funny that he abuses that right, if he crtiticised the North he'd be sent to the gulags. |
Without wishing to support the North Korean regime in any way, it's obviously true that without US intervention the war would have been over quickly and consequently there would have been far fewer casualties. You can't dispute that. |
No I dont. But when it comes to the aftermath of the war the SK people have got of lightly, the poor NK blighters have paid a heavy price. Neither of these countries people had a choice but to fight for what they agreed with.
Historically some or even most of the people in Korea could possible relate to the commie dream of equality. In Korea after hundreds of years of being slaves the majority of people would want to be treated fairly. The oriblem is communist types are even bigger liars than the worst excuse mongers for capitalist excesses.
Given the choice of North or South Korea, where would a sane person live?
There is as you imply no comparison.
Sorry it's too late and I have to sleep.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:00 pm Post subject: Re: "Professor" Kang = commie idiot |
|
|
matthewwoodford wrote: |
Without wishing to support the North Korean regime in any way, it's obviously true that without US intervention the war would have been over quickly and consequently there would have been far fewer casualties. You can't dispute that. |
You also can't dispute the fact that North Korean would have butchered many millions if it had secured complete control of the country. During the first fews months of the war as the marauding North Korean troops took city after city they executed those who wore glasses, had ever owned land, and even those who went to university. Many were put into Pol Pot style collectives too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|