Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Parts of 'Patriot Act' Unconstitutional & Vague
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 4:16 am    Post subject: Parts of 'Patriot Act' Unconstitutional & Vague Reply with quote

Parts of 'Patriot Act' Unconstitutional & Vague: Judge
Fri Jul 29,11:48 PM ET

LOS ANGELES, United States (AFP) - A US federal judge has ruled some provisions of the USA Patriot Act that target funding and assistance to overseas "terrorist" groups as unconstitutionally vague.

The Patriot Act, which critics say undermines the rule of law in the United States, is a package of laws passed in the immediate aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks on US targets.

US District Judge Audrey Collins found that changes the US Congress made to the way "training" and "expert advice and assistance" are defined in the act continue to read in a way that is unconstitutionally vague.

The provisions on training and giving financial assistance were included in the Patriot Act to strengthen an existing law barring US residents giving aid to groups designated as terror organizations by the United States.

Congress revised them after Los Angeles-based Judge Collins ruled in January 2004 that phrases such as "training" could be interpreted in a way that criminalizes activities protected by the First and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution and slapped a penalty of up to 15 years on them.

But the judge said in a ruling issued on Monday that the changes were insufficient to render those parts of the act clear enough for an average person to understand, meaning that those provisions remain unconstitutional.

"Even as amended, the term 'training' is not sufficiently clear so that persons of ordinary intelligence can reasonably understand what conduct the statute prohibits," Collins wrote.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usattacksjusticepatriotsrilankaturkey;_ylt=AgaB2xim0w2tsaD_hrFicH8DW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's good to see the courts fulfilling their constitutional function. Wish it weren't such a slow process, but what can you do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since the Patriot act no attacks in the US.

Jeff Rense wants to see the US government overthrown , and his supporters are rooting for Al Qaida so of course they wants the Patriot gone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Since the Patriot act no attacks in the US.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc is Latin for "after this, therefore because of this." It is often shortened to simply post hoc.

Post hoc, also known as "coincidental correlation" or "false cause," is a logical fallacy which assumes or asserts that if one event happens after another, then the first must be the cause of the second. It is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence is integral to causality — it is true that a cause always happens before its effect. The fallacy lies in coming to a conclusion based only on the order of events, which is not an accurate indicator. That is to say, it is not always true that the first event caused the second event.

Post hoc is an example of affirming the consequent. It can be expressed as follows:

Event A occurred before event B.
Therefore, A must have caused B.


This line of reasoning is the basis for many superstitious beliefs and magical thinking, connecting two things that have no actual or logical connection. For example, if a person sees a coin on the ground and picks it up, and later receives good news, that person may become convinced that finding the coin resulted in the good news, even though it was a mere coincidence.

Post hoc reasoning is related to the logical fallacy "correlation implies causation (cum hoc ergo propter hoc)."

'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' is one of the better known logical fallacies arising from its discussion on an eponymous episode of The West Wing.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=post+hoc+ergo+propter+hoc+fallacies&spell=1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You don't know the Patriot act is not the reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
You don't know the Patriot act is not the reason.

Chronick case of fallacies aside ( n.b. Daddy, what's an AD HOMINEM ??? ) didn't your English teachers ever lecture you on double negatives ??? Assuming they did, clearly you were obviously either staring out the window day-dreaming or fast asleep with that black mucky drool spilling out all over your desk Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I said goes anyway.


Al Qaida would get more PR by hittlng the US than by hitting Europe.

And those who don't want the US to defeat Al Qaida all oppose the patriot act.

Of course Jeff Rense wants everyone to think Al Qaida doesn't exist , and that 9-11 was a conspiracy, just like he wants everyone to think that the holocaust never happened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just how effective is this Patriot Act?

Hmmm

WB: Trying to boost support for the PATRIOT Act, President Bush has been claiming in several post-election campaign appearances that the Act has been responsible for more than 400 arrests and 200 convictions of terrorists. However, an analysis by the Washington Post reveals that only 39 persons were convicted of crimes related to terrorism; most were convicted of immigration law violations. A better way to look at that would be that half of those arrested were not guilty of terrorism or that the government could not find enough evidence to pursue a case. Overall, conviction is a dismal 9.75 percent of those arrested. Now, let's look at those 39. The average sentence was less than a year, which puts it in the misdemeanor not felony sentencing guidelines. Of those 39, Bush and the Justice Department have repeatedly referred to the conviction of the Lackawanna Six, who were arrested near Buffalo, N.Y. The six young Yemeni-Americans readily acknowledged they had traveled to an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan and had heard a speech by Osama bin Laden. There was no evidence they ever participated in a terrorist threat or attack, or had plans to do so. A reality is that every one of those 39 convictions could have been obtained under laws that existed prior to the passage of the PATRIOT Act. And, we still haven't found Osama bin Laden.

MZ: No Osama��but librarians beware. Congressman Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has said: "The PATRIOT Act expanded police monitoring and investigation of our libraries and booksellers, greatly increasing the reach of federal authorities."

http://www.bushwatch.com/brasch.htm


Ya gotta watch them there librarians..... Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Just how effective is this Patriot Act?

Hmmm

WB: Trying to boost support for the PATRIOT Act, President Bush has been claiming in several post-election campaign appearances that the Act has been responsible for more than 400 arrests and 200 convictions of terrorists. However, an analysis by the Washington Post reveals that only 39 persons were convicted of crimes related to terrorism; most were convicted of immigration law violations. A better way to look at that would be that half of those arrested were not guilty of terrorism or that the government could not find enough evidence to pursue a case. Overall, conviction is a dismal 9.75 percent of those arrested. Now, let's look at those 39. The average sentence was less than a year, which puts it in the misdemeanor not felony sentencing guidelines. Of those 39, Bush and the Justice Department have repeatedly referred to the conviction of the Lackawanna Six, who were arrested near Buffalo, N.Y. The six young Yemeni-Americans readily acknowledged they had traveled to an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan and had heard a speech by Osama bin Laden. There was no evidence they ever participated in a terrorist threat or attack, or had plans to do so. A reality is that every one of those 39 convictions could have been obtained under laws that existed prior to the passage of the PATRIOT Act. And, we still haven't found Osama bin Laden.

MZ: No Osama��but librarians beware. Congressman Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has said: "The PATRIOT Act expanded police monitoring and investigation of our libraries and booksellers, greatly increasing the reach of federal authorities."

http://www.bushwatch.com/brasch.htm


Ya gotta watch them there librarians..... Laughing


They got a few on lesser charges and it also makes it easier to for the US to obtain evidence on foreigners who have sympathetic to Bin Laden so the US can kick them out.



It is another obstacle that a terrorist has to overcome.

They should use the Patriot act on Micheal Rivero supporters too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The unConstitutional "Patriot" Act was actually drafted by a foreigner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They should use the Patriot act on Micheal Rivero supporters too. [Quote: Joo]

Exactly what opponents to the "Patriot Act" were afraid of. Guys like you want to start arresting people just because they criticize the government.

First the librarians, then supporters of Micheal Rivero (God knows who they are), then anyone who opposes the war, then anyone who voted Democrat ........ on and on. Who's next? ESL teachers probably. Rolling Eyes

And you wonder why people compare the Bush regime to Hitler?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Exactly what opponents to the "Patriot Act" were afraid of. Guys like you want to start arresting people just because they criticize the government.


He is someone who wants to see Al Qaida win.

Quote:
First the librarians, then supporters of Micheal Rivero (God knows who they are), then anyone who opposes the war, then anyone who voted Democrat ........ on and on. Who's next? ESL teachers probably. Rolling Eyes


Those who don't want to see the US defeat Al Qaida oppose it.

Quote:
And you wonder why people compare the Bush regime to Hitler?


Most of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists compare Bush to Hitler but the same time they are also holocaust deniers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He is someone who wants to see Al Qaida win.


You got any proof of that? I've never read or seen anything that supports this claim, except of course your posts. Micheal Rivero says a lot of dumb things sometimes, but I've never heard or read anything like that.

Quote:
First the librarians, then supporters of Micheal Rivero (God knows who they are), then anyone who opposes the war, then anyone who voted Democrat ........ on and on. Who's next? ESL teachers probably. Rolling Eyes


Those who don't want to see the US defeat Al Qaida oppose it.

What has this got to do with defeating Al Qaida? You want to arrest librarians because you claim "they want Al qaida to win" Rolling Eyes
I think you need to check your reasoning here.

Quote:
And you wonder why people compare the Bush regime to Hitler?


Most of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists compare Bush to Hitler but the same time they are also holocaust deniers.[/quote]

Most? says who? You? You've done a survey of all 9/11 conspiracy sites and can prove this eh?

People who compair Bush to Hitler are not all 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
They are just people who are not afraid to state the obvious.

Here is the leading 9/11 site that I know of. Show me where there is anything about holocost denial.

www.copvcia.com

I am not saying I agree with everything on this site either, I just wanted to show the holes in your logic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="some waygug-in"]He is someone who wants to see Al Qaida win.

Quote:

You got any proof of that? I've never read or seen anything that supports this claim, except of course your posts. Micheal Rivero says a lot of dumb things sometimes, but I've never heard or read anything like that.


He does want them Al Qaida to win , or rather he wants the US to lose.

That is why he puts together his dishonest conspriacy theories to cause disorder so he can get his agenda across.



Quote:
What has this got to do with defeating Al Qaida? You want to arrest librarians because you claim "they want Al qaida to win" Rolling Eyes
I think you need to check your reasoning here.


Where is there arresting librarians? The US govt can see what books someone has checked out.

Pls show a librarian that was arrested.


Quote:
Most? says who? You? You've done a survey of all 9/11 conspiracy sites and can prove this eh?


Seen many of them. Most of them are also involved in holocaust denial.

Quote:
People who compair Bush to Hitler are not all 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
They are just people who are not afraid to state the obvious.



they are either disingenuous or stupid or both.

Quote:
Here is the leading 9/11 site that I know of. Show me where there is anything about holocost denial.



Well most of them are. that guy is just into making conspiracy theories for profit. most of the others have a definite political agenda.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shakuhachi



Joined: 08 Feb 2003
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That being said, is there any piece of legislation passed by congress these days that doesnt contain things that go against the constitution?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International