Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why is the National Guard in Iraq?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:04 am    Post subject: Why is the National Guard in Iraq? Reply with quote

I realize that some National Guard troops were sent to Vietnam, so this isn't a wholly new thing.

But I don't really understand, if the name implies correctly, why the National Guard gets sent to foreign soil. What about the Coast Guard? Are they also subject to duty in Iraq?

Just looking for an explanation...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Embarassed

Last edited by some waygug-in on Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It has nothing to do with the Bush Administration, waygug-in. It's a force structure philosphy that concentrates training on a small, professional, active-duty force and supplements this, indeed, relies on, a large number of reserves to back the active-duty force up in wartime, etc.

Note that many reserve MOS include signals, military police, transportation, etc.

It makes for a cheaper budget, especially in peacetime, and allows for top-of-the line equipment and training for the active-duty force...

This force structure philosphy goes back at least as far as Reagan/Bush, as far as I know. Mahan talks about it, I recall, in his late nineteenth-century works on how a modern Navy ought to be structured, for example.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:39 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

So Goph,

What you are saying is that the National Guard functions as an army reserve?

What, then, about the Army Reserve?

What about the Coast Guard?

This is what I'd most like explained. Our Coast hasn't moved to the Middle East. So we still have the Coast Guard guarding it, right?

I really just want to know.

As for Bush/Reagan, I'm pretty sure there were some NG in Vietnam.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deleted

Last edited by Gopher on Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:25 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Quote:
I'm afraid that's all I can contribute to the questions you raised.


Wow, are you sure?

You're just going to let me burble in my all-consuming hatred, not understanding word one of what you're saying?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Embarassed

Last edited by some waygug-in on Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Thank you for correcting my mis-informed opinion.


You, too, have descended to his dark, sarcastic world of bitterness and hostility?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It wasn't intended to be sarcastic. If it seems that way, I apologize.
I think things have gotten a bit too personalized and I would rather that people just calm down a notch or two.

Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International