Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A reason I lean towards the Palestinians

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:31 am    Post subject: A reason I lean towards the Palestinians Reply with quote

This interview pretty much sums up why I sympathize more for palestinians than Israelis:

We Will Lose Our Land if We Stay Quiet

Quote:
Every week you lead nonviolent, creative protests against the wall. Tell us about them.

We try to create a new theme for each of our demonstrations because we realise that this struggle will last a long time.

Persistence requires innovation. Doing the same thing every time leads to boredom for those who cover it - and I mean the media. I am sure that as a media person you know this - where there is something new, you will go after it.

If we have a protest, and someone is hurt, or seven people die, week after week, soon it becomes the same old news. So innovation makes it fresh news for the journalists.

At first we began somewhat spontaneously - in February of this year when we learned our land was being threatened. Then the demonstrations became organised and planned.

The idea was to send the message to Palestine, to the Israeli army and to the entire world that there is a small village called Bil'in whose very existence is at stake and who will not stay quiet about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the Palestinian ought to get their state but they could have had it if Arafat had not turned down Bill Clintons' offer.

I think Abbas is ok , but he inherited a situation that was more than anyone else's Arafat's doing.

Now I think Israel ought to give him a clean slate to work with , but Gee BB you are being pretty forgiving of what Arafat did. Israel also has to deal with crazies like Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. i said lean towards. Didn't say I'm 100% behind the Palestinians
2. Who said anything about Arafat? I didn't, the article didn't. Did you even read it?? It didn't discuss Palestinian politicians whatsoever.

I thought the article was an interesting interview of a community leader. It was an example of Palestinians resisting Israeli "aggression" through peaceful, lawful means. Unfortunately the media does not cover these types of actions because well, violence sells I guess.

I suppose I should have elaborated more in the OP.

Edit: one thing you have to give Israel a little credit for, it does give the Palestinians the ability for some legal actions.

Quote:
The Israeli High Court ruled on 15 September that part of the separation barrier has imposed major hardships on a group of Palestinian villages and must be rerouted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rapier



Joined: 16 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think its pretty obvious Palestinians will use any territory to advance their ultimate goal of the destruction of Israel.

if they give up their claim to israel, renounce violence, and show they are capable of responsible self goverment, co-existing peacefully and productively with their neighbors..etc then give them their state. but how likely is that? It will never happen.

In supporting the creation of "Palestine" (a state that has no legal grounds, historical claim or legitimacy- you are supporting the jihad not only against Israel but the west, and all infidels. including you.Today israel: tomorrow Europe and America.

Israel is an ally of the U.S.
Bucheon bum you are sympathising with terrorists who like to kill innocent people with bombs and suicide attacks. bin laden is their hero. They are part of a jihad that seeks to ipose their backward ways on the rest of the world.

Its akin to me saying "I support the attacks on America, I hope muslims kill you all with bomb attacks". maybe if you get a bit more terror knocking on your own doorstep, then you'd know what Israelis have had to put up with for decades.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, since I sympathize with some poor olive farmers losing their farms (you think you'd be a bit empathetic yourself Wink ) I support terrorism. Brilliant logic there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting article. You don't hear enough about the non-violent protests, at least not in American media. I still don't lean towards the Pals, tho. It's a land grab, sure, but it's one village. I would lean more towards the Israelis if they didn't have settlements in Palestine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. I doubt this village is unique and is the only one in this situation. Sure, some have been saved thanks to Israeli courts, but this article makes it clear not all of them are that fortunate.
2. Well yeah, I would be less supportive of the Palestinians if there were no settlements, but the fact is there are. As long as they exist, pretty hard to support the Israelis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Palestine defientely needs a state, no doubt about that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rapier



Joined: 16 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I lean towards the israelis. heres why.

An Elusive Palestinian Peace

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can the Palestinians ever agree to peace with Israel? The prospects do not look good despite Israeli efforts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The most vexatious aspect of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is the refusal of any Arab nation to provide any help whatever in resolving it. By dint of wars declared upon it, the Israelis became the unwilling ��occupiers�� of land on which dwelt three million Arabs who came, in time, to be called Palestinians. The land, Gaza and the West Bank, and the people who lived on it previously had been part of Egypt and Jordan.

Anyone who has followed the long, torturous road to peace the Israelis sought from the Palestinians knows that, under the grip of Yasser Arafat, that goal was never going to be achieved. Now we are expected to believe that his longtime second in command, Mahmoud Abbas, will get Palestinians to abandon the destruction the Israel as their only goal in life. It is the worst kept secret in Palestine and Israel that Abbas has virtually no constituency or power to influence events and, in particular, Hamas.

The destruction of Israel has been the sine qua non of Arab excuses. All the problems endemic to Arab culture, society, economies, and governments are blamed on the presence of Israel. If Arab nations were to actually acknowledge the sovereignty of Israel, they would lose the one issue with which to divert Arabs from the primary reason—Islam—they remain impoverished and oppressed.

So, when you read that Hamas wants to participate in Palestinian parliament races or that Hezbollah wants to do the same in Lebanon, one must ask whether Radical Islam can sanction secular governments and the answer to that is no. Radical Islam does not permit for a separation of mosque and state.

The next question is whether ordinary Arabs will find ways around that? Will they, in a desire for real peace and stability, opt finally for democracy? There is some indication in Iraq and Afghanistan this is possible.

Ironically, Arab Israelis have had the right to vote since that nation��s independence in 1948. Arab Israelis have died along side Jewish citizens during the Infitada that tiny nation has endured. Arab Israelis even serve in Israel��s military. And Arab Israelis hold office in the Knesset.

It is well to recall that half of Israel��s Jewish population fled there to escape persecution and death in Arab nations. By contrast, after it declared independence, Arabs that lived in Israel were encouraged to flee by fellow Arabs with promises they would return in the wake of an Arab victory. Today they are the oldest group of refugees extant in the world!

Still, the reality is that there are three million Palestinians the Israelis do not want to rule and whose land, Gaza and the West Bank, they do not want to occupy.

Jews have lived in Israel since they accepted the Covenant, well over three thousand years ago. Indeed, Jews have lived throughout the Middle East for millennia. In Egypt��s Alexandria, there was a large Jewish community centuries before either Jesus or Mohammed. Jews had lived in Iraq had since the days of Babylonian captivity. Indeed, there is hardly a Middle Eastern nation where they have not lived.

The designation of Arab ��Palestinians�� ignores the fact that no such group ever existed prior to Arafat��s campaign to destroy Israel. As chairman of the PLO and head of the Fatah terrorist organization, Arafat stole billions sent to help ��Palestinians.�� At his death, his personal holdings were estimated to be $1.3 billion.

As this is being written, there is much tumult and dissention among Israelis regarding Ariel Sharon��s efforts to abandon settlements surrounded by Arabs. Those settlements were initially created to establish the de facto existence of the Israeli��s right to live where Jews had lived for millennia. The settlers are being asked to pay the price for Sharon��s effort to find peace with Arabs whose sole objective has been Israel��s destruction. Middle East expert, Daniel Pipes, calls the forced removal of 8,000 Israelis from their homes in Gaza ��an act of monumental political folly�� citing the way Arabs interpret such actions as weakness and an invitation to attack. Can Palestinians create a civil, secular and legitimate government that will forsake terrorism as their raison d��etre? At best, Hamas and other terrorist groups have agreed only to stop killing Israelis for the rest of the year. Sporadic attacks continue. Will the fence that divides them from Israel have to remain in place for decades to come?

Even now, the Israelis are anticipating a renewed Palestinian offensive in the fall of 2005. Their military anticipates that fighting will begin as early as September 2005 when the Israeli army withdraws from the Gaza Strip and the northern West Bank.

The Israelis want peace with the Palestinians. The United States has striven through successive administrations to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It is a bold gamble, but one filled with risk. We shall now watch as the Israelis again roll the dice again to see if peace is achievable. To this observer, the answer remains no.
http://www.webcommentary.com/asp/ShowArticle.asp?id=carubaa&date=050418

Israel: a tiny country of 4 million people surrounded on all sides by millions of arabs covering a vast geographical area, all hellbent on destroying it.


Last edited by rapier on Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:10 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
Palestine defientely needs a state, no doubt about that.

Defintely. If generations continue to grow up and grow old in refugee camps, no one will have peace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like it or not, Hamas has become a part of the political landscape for the foreseeable future. Here's an interview with their current leader, FWIW:

Quote:
Interview with Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar

Posted: 26-09-2005 , 06:37 GMT

Senior Hamas Leader, Mahmoud Zahar claims a victory for the resistance after the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and attributes Hamas� tremendous popularity to their translucent style of governance in a system still plagued with corruption.

Interview conducted by Erica Silverman, Gaza City

Palestinian factions maintained the agreed upon �period of calm� while Israel evacuated all 21 Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip. Since, Hamas has held seemingly endless celebrations marking the �success� of their resistance while calling for Palestinian unity.

President Mahmoud Abbas has kept Hamas involved in the political process, despite the fact they will challenge his own Fatah party in the coming January legislative elections.

Hamas has entered the democratic process, although the group is still committed to a violent resistance to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories. Zahar applauds the role of the Egyptian delegation in mediating between Palestinian factions, and demands that the Palestinian Authority take responsibility for internal security matters.


Q.) There was a consensus reached among the Palestinian factions, and the Israeli settlers did not evacuate under fire. What was Hamas� role in facilitating this coordination and maintaining this period of calm?

A.) Our aim was to push the Israelis out, either under fire or quietness. We succeeded and our goal is achieved. Because of the resistance Israel reached the conclusion they should leave; their existence here was costing them too much.


Q.) How active has Hamas been in the �Withdrawal Committee� comprised of the top level leadership from different factions. Has Hamas been involved in the coordination for the celebrations and the return of settlement land post withdrawal?

A.) We have almost succeeded to reach a conclusion regarding the seaport, concerning the waste products of the settlements, the agricultural policy after the withdrawal, and the presence of the Israelis at Rafah crossing. We are in contact with the [Palestinian Authority] ministries concerning the withdrawal� Two days before [the withdrawal] we met with Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia and agreed to have a common celebration with the PA and all Palestinian factions, and after that it is the right of every faction to celebrate to his will.

Q.) Can you give a statement regarding the recent assassination of Musa Arafat and the subsequent kidnapping of his son, Menhal and who do think should be held accountable?

A.) The people that executed the killing and kidnapping are a Palestinian militant group, the Moqwama Shabiya [Popular Resistance Committee]. They are responsible and declared that frankly. The people are very happy about what happened; Musa Arafat was a criminal.

Q.) What is the relationship between the PRC and Hamas?

A.) We have a good relationship with all the Palestinian factions that run a resistance against Israel.

Q.) The security situation in the Gaza Strip is deteriorating. Considering that the PRC was able to carry this out and take credit for it, how do you think the PA should respond?

A.) This was because of the corruption of the PA administration. They allowed their people to kill, to take the money of the Palestinian people, and this was a reaction.

Q.) What do you think of the PA�s ability to control the security situation?

A.) They are unable. First of all they need to control the security affairs inside the PA. What happened was a reaction of the PA security forces against their own member, Musa Arafat. They [PA security] in no way interfered to stop this attack. They were aware of what would happen and for 45 minutes nobody interfered.

Q.) Does Hamas provide security for the Palestinian people?

A.) It is not our responsibility. If we were to provide security the American people will say they are carrying guns, they are an alternative authority. They would not allow two armies with the Palestinian state. We discussed this, they [the PA] are responsible, and have to face their responsibility.

Q.) If and when Hamas is successful in the coming legislative election, how will Hamas improve the security situation?
A.) Our program, fist of all, would abruptly end corruption.

Q.) How would Hamas respond to the families that continue to take the law into their own hands? For example, the recent wave of kidnappings.

A.) Why are the people doing so? What are they collecting guns? First they were fighting against the Israelis and now they are afraid of the PA administration because they are listing to the statements of Tawfik Abu Khoosa [PA Ministry of Interior spokesperson] that there is only one weapon and there is one army that is legal. Nobody trusts them. Musa Arafat�s actions are in the minds of the Palestinian people, and they are not going to give anyone the chance to repeat this process. They have to protect themselves not only on the organizational level, but also on the familial level. If the people feel secure they will react positively to any administration that will protect them.

Q.) Can you comment on the popularity of a recently elected Hamas mayor, Abu Osama (Ahmed Al Kurdi) in Deir El Balah?

A.) Every member of Hamas who succeeded to be mayor has achieved success... in Beit Lahiya and in Beit Hanoun. They are doing their best and are bringing a big change. In Dir Balah they are checking every morning to make sure municipal workers came to their jobs, paving new streets, new ways, and facilitating and improving the municipal activities. This is not satisfying America, because America is looking for a corrupt system to cooperate with them and Israel.

Q.) The western media often attributes Hamas� popularity to the social services they provide. To what do you attribute Hamas� tremendous popularity?

A.) It is not a recent phenomenon. Hamas is representing the consciousness of the Palestinian people. Hamas is representing the real attitude of their religion, the religion of the Palestinian whether they are Christian or Muslim�We are proud of our history. Hamas is presenting a purified system to run the administration by the most peaceful method which is elections. Regardless of the political aid or social aid, Hamas is setting a good example of how life has become much better on the political level � municipal and parliamentary - and social levels.

Q.) The Untied Stated and the European Union still consider Hamas a �Terrorist� organization. Are you still negotiating with EU representatives?

A.) They [the Bush administration] are criminals, they left the black classes in New Orleans to be killed by a natural disaster and they did not interfere. They are real �terrorists,� it is a matter if conviction. This administration is describing the freedom fighters as terrorists. America is committing state crimes against innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan, in Palestine, and even Venezuela.

Q.) Would you negotiate with the US?

A.) The US is not our interest. We are fighting for the liberation of our land, protecting our people, battling corruption � these are out interests - whether this is satisfying America or not. America is not considered as our God, we are not obedient to this administration. This administration is going to loose their popular support as we are watching.



Q.) What is your position toward the EU?

A.) We have no bad feelings toward the EU, but they have a hypocritical policy. They are afraid of America. They are afraid from Israel. They do not want to be described as anti-Semitic. They are not expressing their feelings honestly.



Q.) How do you feel about the role Egypt has taken negotiating with Israel on behalf of the Palestinians, and negotiating between Palestinian factions?

A.) The Egyptian government is serving two interests - the Egyptian interest to keep this area quite before the elimination of the occupation, and also to make reconciliation inside the Palestinian society, and to give the chance for elections. Up to this moment the Egyptian policies are acceptable. In the future we will escalate our relations with Egypt because this is the only chance for the Gaza Strip to connect with the Arab and Muslim world.

Q.) What is your position regarding the Rafah crossing?

A.) During his visit Mr. Omar Suleiman stated we [Egypt] will not allow Israel to be there. If they are there, Hamas will not accept it. The Egyptian administration told us they will not allow Gaza to become a big prison, and they will not accept the existence of the Israelis at the gate. Concerning the commercial gate, called Kerem Shalom, if the PA accepts this and if we succeed in the elections, we are going to make an end to this gate.

Q.) Your position toward Israelis is that all civilians are considered the �enemy� since there is mandatory military service for all citizens. What is your position toward Muslims that are living in Israeli and/or the Arab-Israelis?

A.) They are our brothers, our relatives.

Q.) Many of them are Israeli.

A.) They are not Israeli. They are under Israeli control, when they took their land in 1948. They are forced to use the Israeli passport.

Q.) The settlers were portrayed as victims as they were evacuating. What is your response to this image?

A.) They are victims�.because they killed only 4,000 Palestinian people, one third of them children? They are victims; because they occupied our land�they came from Ethiopia, from America. This is a shameful, historical mistake. It is a shameful thing to consider these killers and thieves as victims� The American media belongs to the Israeli Zionists, whether they are Jewish or Christian Zionists.

Q.) Al Jazeera will launch an English channel this year. Do you think this will present a more accurate picture of the Palestinian situation to the rest of the world?

A.) It should be. Occupation is a big disaster. Not just for the Palestinians; for the Egyptians, Syrians, Ethiopians, and for international peace. The defeat of the Israeli aggression will serve international interests.

Q.) The PA has asserted the occupation continues even though the Israelis have withdrew, since they are still maintaining control over the border crossings, the sea port�

A.) [Interrupts] Ok, it is a first step � it is a clear picture of the success of resistance and it is a big victory.


� 2005 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)

http://www.albawaba.com/en/countries/Palestine/189570
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigverne



Joined: 12 May 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
You don't hear enough about the non-violent protests, at least not in American media.


That's because when it comes down to it, they are irrelevant. The leadership of the PA, Hamas and Islamic Jihad are the most powerful voices of the Palestinian people and they are supporters of terrorism.

The civil rights movement in America, and the campaign for Indian independence were seen as non-violent because the most prominent leaders of these movements followed the principle of non-violence. When prominent Palestinian leaders and organisations do the same, we may hear about these non-violent movements. But at the present time, the Palestinian 'struggle' is one that uses terrorism as its prime weapon, and increasingly, the doctrine of Koranically inspired 'Jihad' as justification.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:48 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Chewbacca quotes the Koran...

Now that we're done with that, Israel really doesn't have a leg to stand on until they abandon the Occupied Territory.

Let's say California invaded Tijuana. Tijuanans keep attacking California until they abandon Tijuana.

Labeling someone a terrorist is deteriorating daily. In my version of history, the term "terrorism" came into place during the 80's. By the way it's being applied now, we lost Saigon to the terrorists...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigverne



Joined: 12 May 2004

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Chewbacca quotes the Koran...


What are you talking about? Oh that's right, you can't actually refute anything I have said, so you are reduced to the above meaningless drivel.
By the way, where did I quote from the Koran?

Quote:
Let's say California invaded Tijuana. Tijuanans keep attacking California until they abandon Tijuana.


Poor analogy. Let's say that Tijuana (wherever that is), along with New Mexico (yes, I know it's a US state, but it's not my analogy!), Washington and Nevada simultaneously attack California, with the avowed aim of destroying it. California defends itself, and to hinder Nevada being used as a launching pad for future attacks, occupies a large chunk of it.

The Arabs started a war, they lost, and the Israelis took Jerusalem and the West Bank as the spoils. Rarely in the history of warfare has a state given back territory it gained, after it was attacked initially. It was not some unprovoked invasion as you make it out to be. I am not condoning the settlements, and believe that they will eventually have to be disbanded to achieve a lasting peace. I was merely correcting your distortion of events that is borne out of either historical ignorance, or a willful avoidance of facts because it doesn't suit your ideological viewpoint. I reckon it's the latter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Summer Wine



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Location: Next to a River

PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
By the way it's being applied now, we lost Saigon to the terrorists...


Here's an interesting piece of trivia. The captured Head of the Viet Cong or at least the highest captured leader was handed over to the South Vietnamese military by the americans a week before Saigon fell.

They took him for a one way plane trip over the ocean, just so they wouldn't have to admit to losing to him and the Viet Cong. Reports of actions taken against the Viet Cong by the NVA post Saigon, maybe make it fair to say they didn't want the Viet Cong to get credit either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International