View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: Teaching Grammar |
|
|
I was asked by my boss whether I felt that it was good to teach the following to middle school students.
Present tense,
Finished Present tense,
ongoing present tense
and a few others that I can't remember just now. My feeling is that it probably won't hurt them as we learn to use these types of tenses when we are young and use them, though are not always taught the rules regarding them until later. I feel that teaching them is probably not useless as long as it is not totally demanded that they have to understand them now and the rules applying to them right now, but understand that they may grow into understanding them when they are retaught them at a later date. But allowing them to be used, taught etc, is just an ongoing process of english learning.
What do you think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baldrick

Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: Location, Location
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you mean the present continuous and the present perfect?
Grammer structures are so important in learning english and sometimes they can be taught structually as 'grammer' but that quickly gets boring for the students. They should be aware of the grammer they are studying and then have it modelled in the content of the lesson i.e. hearing it in listening exercises, speaking it in dialogues etc etc......
It could be a nightmare however. To use the present prefect a student needs to know past participles..........do they?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: Teaching Grammar |
|
|
Summer Wine wrote: |
I feel that teaching them is probably not useless as long as it is not totally demanded that they have to understand them now and the rules applying to them right now, but understand that they may grow into understanding them when they are retaught them at a later date. |
I hope you can explain it to them more clearly than that, lol.
To me it seems teaching a *little* grammar is useful if you get the students practicing it in conversation right away. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilovebdt

Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Location: Nr Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talking of grammar. Can anyone recommend a good grammar book. In all my years of teaching I haven't taught that much grammar, so would like to refresh my memory |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
plattwaz
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Location: <Write something dumb here>
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Although I can't fully make sense of the OP, my initial understanding leads me to this --
You shouldn't teach them verb tenses in a grammar class simply for the sake of it. If the students are at the level where they can understand present perfect and present continuous being taught to them by a native speaker, then yes, they should be introduced to the guidelines for using them. Usually the present continuous is taught after the students can correctly use the (simple) present tense and the simple past tense. At that point, most students should have gained enough fluency from reading and listening to actually be using the present continuous correctly some of the time - although they might not know there is a verb name for it. Introducing them to the fact that a name exists for this sentence structure and giving them a framework for creating it is no harm.
If your hagwan is using a decent cirriculum and program, then I would assume the grammar book (or grammar portion of the general book) would introduce these language points at the appropriate time.
RE: the best grammar book to get, as a teacher - definitely it's Martin Parrott's Grammar for English Language Teachers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just remember some of us struggle with remembering all that crap when we're native speakers in grade school. I sure as heck can't remember the names of all the tenses, though of course I know how to use them. I think it's best to teach grammar by introducing a pattern and giving students various kinds of practice using it.
For example, you might first present the pattern
Quote: |
I am going to the _____________. |
and get them to make sentences.
Then add another degree of freedom:
Quote: |
I am _________ing.
He is ____________ing a/an _____________. |
Then ask questions to the students to elicit uses of the pattern. Then maybe use pictures or charades and make them produce sentences from scratch.
You never have to teach the name of the tense, and you definitely shouldn't test them on the terms of the rule. Test them instead with fill-in-the-blank or detect-the-mistake type exercises, or by asking questions to elicit the pattern. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Summer Wine
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: Next to a River
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I didn't explain myself better. I was shown a book which had a list of tenses on it, then asked my opinion. I told him that I was never taught the rules regarding them until a certain age, which was older than the age group he was considering. Rules, not grammatically correct sentences, we all teach proper english grammar. We have too, korean grammar is different from english. We show them the way it works and help them to understand.
That being said, you should all know how hagwon desire these lessons to be taught. They will want the children to understand the rules and repeat them, use them precisely. I hoped to get across to my boss the idea that he could use the book (they probably already have them in boxes sitting there) but don't expect them to fully understand until they are older and can comprehend the rules.
Everyone knows, the way we think at 13 is different from the way we think at 23 or at 33. We sometimes come into a greater awareness of the rules when we are older that we didn't have when we were originally taught them at the age of 1 or 2 (by copying others way of speaking). We grow into understanding grammar, it is no more different than some of our students who use english words but use Korean grammar. We in our basic stages of learning a language do the same.
We only understand the rules at a later stage, this doesn't prevent us being taught the grammar even if we don't fully understand it. I could go on, but its late. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baldrick

Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: Location, Location
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Language aquisition of your first language is an incredible process and is a huge area of research for Linguisitcs, and I feel it is a fascinating subject. For the native speaker, grammer is programmed into us and language is a natural part of our being much like a reaction to heat or the urge to eat when hungry.........Aqusition of a second language however, means entering a world of GRAMMER pain......the process could not be much more painful, especially with all the little rules and exceptions we have in English........never underestimate how easy it is for us and how difficult it is for them
I also think its better for 2nd language learners to at least be aware of the grammer they are using the first time they learn it. Introducing grammer to students who have never studied it before will probably just lead to mass confusion and over a million ' then why.........', 'but teacher.......' questions - unless you have a lot of class time and serious students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xtchr
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, feel free to flame away as I am about to correct another poster's spelling, because it's annoying me a great deal, and I am in a lousy mood this dreary Friday.
Baldrick; no offense, but please if you are going to post about grammar, can you spell it correctly, i.e grammAr
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baldrick

Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: Location, Location
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xtchr wrote: |
Hi, feel free to flame away as I am about to correct another poster's spelling, because it's annoying me a great deal, and I am in a lousy mood this dreary Friday.
Baldrick; no offense, but please if you are going to post about grammar, can you spell it correctly, i.e grammAr
Thanks |
Oh yeah I forgot .............. I'm not PERFECT. Thanks for that. Yes I'm an english teacher but spelling is not my strongest point - about the same as your knowledge of the post subject, if thats all you can add....
OUCH! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The highlight of one teaching orientation that I had in China was when this American dude promised us that by the end of the lesson, we would fully understand the topic being discussed.
He began by writing on the board "English Grammy"... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blunder1983
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm doing a grammar auction this week, having the students "buy" sentences and correct them. Its going really well and the kids are REALLY good at it (better than me or my co-teacher could have hoped for) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baldrick

Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: Location, Location
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blunder1983 wrote: |
I'm doing a grammar auction this week, having the students "buy" sentences and correct them. Its going really well and the kids are REALLY good at it (better than me or my co-teacher could have hoped for) |
Yes those grammAr auctions are cool - from about.com right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xtchr
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|